{"title":"重新定义间接缺水试验的诊断截止值。","authors":"Yash Akkara, Kavita Narula, Katharine Lazarus, Deborah Papadopoulou, Sirazum Choudhury, Niamh Martin, Karim Meeran","doi":"10.1111/cen.15172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>An incorrect diagnosis of arginine vasopressin deficiency and resistance (AVP-D and AVP-R) results in the potentially dangerous use of desmopressin in healthy individuals. The water deprivation test is a central diagnostic test in patients with polydipsia polyuria syndrome (PPS). This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the current interpretation of reference ranges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a retrospective analysis of 135 patients who underwent a water deprivation test between August 2014 and August 2023. All patient diagnoses were reviewed, and variability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for serum osmolality, serum sodium and urine osmolality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Serum sodium demonstrated reduced variability compared with serum osmolality (0.72% vs. 1.16%, respectively, 37.5% reduction; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The standard serum osmolality cut-off value of ≥ 300 mOsm/kg in diagnosing AVP-D, AVP-R, and primary polydipsia (PP) achieved a sensitivity of 76.19% and specificity of 76.92%. A serum sodium cut-off value of ≥ 148 mmol/L demonstrated 100% specificity in excluding PP. This cut-off was used alongside urine osmolality cut-off values of > 630 mOsm/kg (for PP) and < 383 mOsm/kg (for AVP-D/AVP-R). Review of post-desmopressin urine osmolality and clinical monitoring was performed in equivocal diagnostic cases (<i>n</i> = 6), achieving 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity within the study sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates that a serum sodium cut-off of ≥ 148 mmol/L in tandem with urine osmolality yields the best diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between AVP-D, AVP-R, and PP. Serum sodium may be more reliable than serum osmolality in the investigation of patients with PPS, demonstrating lower biological and analytical variability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":"102 2","pages":"149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining Diagnostic Cut-Offs for the Indirect Water Deprivation Test\",\"authors\":\"Yash Akkara, Kavita Narula, Katharine Lazarus, Deborah Papadopoulou, Sirazum Choudhury, Niamh Martin, Karim Meeran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cen.15172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>An incorrect diagnosis of arginine vasopressin deficiency and resistance (AVP-D and AVP-R) results in the potentially dangerous use of desmopressin in healthy individuals. The water deprivation test is a central diagnostic test in patients with polydipsia polyuria syndrome (PPS). This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the current interpretation of reference ranges.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a retrospective analysis of 135 patients who underwent a water deprivation test between August 2014 and August 2023. All patient diagnoses were reviewed, and variability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for serum osmolality, serum sodium and urine osmolality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Serum sodium demonstrated reduced variability compared with serum osmolality (0.72% vs. 1.16%, respectively, 37.5% reduction; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The standard serum osmolality cut-off value of ≥ 300 mOsm/kg in diagnosing AVP-D, AVP-R, and primary polydipsia (PP) achieved a sensitivity of 76.19% and specificity of 76.92%. A serum sodium cut-off value of ≥ 148 mmol/L demonstrated 100% specificity in excluding PP. This cut-off was used alongside urine osmolality cut-off values of > 630 mOsm/kg (for PP) and < 383 mOsm/kg (for AVP-D/AVP-R). Review of post-desmopressin urine osmolality and clinical monitoring was performed in equivocal diagnostic cases (<i>n</i> = 6), achieving 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity within the study sample.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrates that a serum sodium cut-off of ≥ 148 mmol/L in tandem with urine osmolality yields the best diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between AVP-D, AVP-R, and PP. Serum sodium may be more reliable than serum osmolality in the investigation of patients with PPS, demonstrating lower biological and analytical variability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"102 2\",\"pages\":\"149-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.15172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.15172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Redefining Diagnostic Cut-Offs for the Indirect Water Deprivation Test
Objective
An incorrect diagnosis of arginine vasopressin deficiency and resistance (AVP-D and AVP-R) results in the potentially dangerous use of desmopressin in healthy individuals. The water deprivation test is a central diagnostic test in patients with polydipsia polyuria syndrome (PPS). This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the current interpretation of reference ranges.
Methods
This is a retrospective analysis of 135 patients who underwent a water deprivation test between August 2014 and August 2023. All patient diagnoses were reviewed, and variability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for serum osmolality, serum sodium and urine osmolality.
Results
Serum sodium demonstrated reduced variability compared with serum osmolality (0.72% vs. 1.16%, respectively, 37.5% reduction; p < 0.001). The standard serum osmolality cut-off value of ≥ 300 mOsm/kg in diagnosing AVP-D, AVP-R, and primary polydipsia (PP) achieved a sensitivity of 76.19% and specificity of 76.92%. A serum sodium cut-off value of ≥ 148 mmol/L demonstrated 100% specificity in excluding PP. This cut-off was used alongside urine osmolality cut-off values of > 630 mOsm/kg (for PP) and < 383 mOsm/kg (for AVP-D/AVP-R). Review of post-desmopressin urine osmolality and clinical monitoring was performed in equivocal diagnostic cases (n = 6), achieving 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity within the study sample.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that a serum sodium cut-off of ≥ 148 mmol/L in tandem with urine osmolality yields the best diagnostic accuracy to differentiate between AVP-D, AVP-R, and PP. Serum sodium may be more reliable than serum osmolality in the investigation of patients with PPS, demonstrating lower biological and analytical variability.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.