{"title":"不同浓度罗哌卡因在电视胸腔镜手术患者锯肌前平面阻滞中的镇痛作用和药代动力学:一项前瞻性随机试验。","authors":"Lingkai Tang MSc , Caomei Xu MSc , Jianfen Xie B.S. , Jiahao Xu MSc , Chen Chen PhD , Jiang Shen B.S. , Nan Hu PhD , Lan Qiu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Investigate the analgesia effects and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine at different concentrations in Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) and assess the efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-six patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resections were enrolled. Ultrasound-guided SAPB was induced with 3 mg/kg ropivacaine at different concentrations (0.25%, 0.5%, and 0.75%, referred to as Group L, Group M, and Group H, respectively). The concentration of ropivacaine in the plasma at 1, 15, 30, 45, 60 min, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after SAPB was determined by LC-MS/MS. Other evaluated measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and on movement, the frequency of dermatomes blocked, onset time and effective plane, Quality of Requirements(QoR)-15 scale, chronic postsurgical pain, and the level of IL-6 and IL-8.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The NRS scores were significantly higher in Group L than those in other groups (<em>P</em> < 0.05), indicating that the analgesic effect of Group L was the worst among the three groups. Group H had a lower effective plane of anesthesia and significantly higher incidence of chronic postsurgical pain. The IL-8 level was significantly lower in Group H than in other groups at 1 min, 1 h, and 24 h after SAPB. The ropivacaine concentrations were the highest in Group H, followed by Group M and Group L. The high blood concentration of ropivacaine in Group H may increase the risk of systemic toxicity from local anesthetics. Compared to Group L and Group H, Group M had superior analgesic effects and better safety. Among the three groups, <em>C</em><sub>max</sub>, t<sub>1/2</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> differed significantly.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>For patients undergoing VATS, using 0.5% ropivacaine for SAPB is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic Effects and Pharmacokinetics of Ropivacaine at Different Concentrations in Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial\",\"authors\":\"Lingkai Tang MSc , Caomei Xu MSc , Jianfen Xie B.S. , Jiahao Xu MSc , Chen Chen PhD , Jiang Shen B.S. , Nan Hu PhD , Lan Qiu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Investigate the analgesia effects and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine at different concentrations in Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) and assess the efficacy and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-six patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resections were enrolled. Ultrasound-guided SAPB was induced with 3 mg/kg ropivacaine at different concentrations (0.25%, 0.5%, and 0.75%, referred to as Group L, Group M, and Group H, respectively). The concentration of ropivacaine in the plasma at 1, 15, 30, 45, 60 min, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after SAPB was determined by LC-MS/MS. Other evaluated measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and on movement, the frequency of dermatomes blocked, onset time and effective plane, Quality of Requirements(QoR)-15 scale, chronic postsurgical pain, and the level of IL-6 and IL-8.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The NRS scores were significantly higher in Group L than those in other groups (<em>P</em> < 0.05), indicating that the analgesic effect of Group L was the worst among the three groups. Group H had a lower effective plane of anesthesia and significantly higher incidence of chronic postsurgical pain. The IL-8 level was significantly lower in Group H than in other groups at 1 min, 1 h, and 24 h after SAPB. The ropivacaine concentrations were the highest in Group H, followed by Group M and Group L. The high blood concentration of ropivacaine in Group H may increase the risk of systemic toxicity from local anesthetics. Compared to Group L and Group H, Group M had superior analgesic effects and better safety. Among the three groups, <em>C</em><sub>max</sub>, t<sub>1/2</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> differed significantly.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>For patients undergoing VATS, using 0.5% ropivacaine for SAPB is recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 62-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824003291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824003291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analgesic Effects and Pharmacokinetics of Ropivacaine at Different Concentrations in Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Purpose
Investigate the analgesia effects and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine at different concentrations in Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) and assess the efficacy and safety.
Methods
Thirty-six patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resections were enrolled. Ultrasound-guided SAPB was induced with 3 mg/kg ropivacaine at different concentrations (0.25%, 0.5%, and 0.75%, referred to as Group L, Group M, and Group H, respectively). The concentration of ropivacaine in the plasma at 1, 15, 30, 45, 60 min, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after SAPB was determined by LC-MS/MS. Other evaluated measures included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at rest and on movement, the frequency of dermatomes blocked, onset time and effective plane, Quality of Requirements(QoR)-15 scale, chronic postsurgical pain, and the level of IL-6 and IL-8.
Findings
The NRS scores were significantly higher in Group L than those in other groups (P < 0.05), indicating that the analgesic effect of Group L was the worst among the three groups. Group H had a lower effective plane of anesthesia and significantly higher incidence of chronic postsurgical pain. The IL-8 level was significantly lower in Group H than in other groups at 1 min, 1 h, and 24 h after SAPB. The ropivacaine concentrations were the highest in Group H, followed by Group M and Group L. The high blood concentration of ropivacaine in Group H may increase the risk of systemic toxicity from local anesthetics. Compared to Group L and Group H, Group M had superior analgesic effects and better safety. Among the three groups, Cmax, t1/2, and AUC0-∞ differed significantly.
Implications
For patients undergoing VATS, using 0.5% ropivacaine for SAPB is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.