Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe
{"title":"静脉漏栓塞对单纯动脉血运重建无效的混合性动静脉勃起功能障碍患者的临床改善效果。","authors":"Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"184-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"184-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone.
Purpose: To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).
Materials and methods: Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.
Results: Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.
Conclusion: Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.
期刊介绍:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.