静脉漏栓塞对单纯动脉血运重建无效的混合性动静脉勃起功能障碍患者的临床改善效果。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe
{"title":"静脉漏栓塞对单纯动脉血运重建无效的混合性动静脉勃起功能障碍患者的临床改善效果。","authors":"Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"184-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Diehm, Dominique Hirschle, Christoph Kalka, Hak Hong Keo, Vignes Mohan, Martin Christian Schumacher, Andreas Gutwein, Dai-Do Do, Hanno Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"184-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03910-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析初步动脉血运重建术后附加静脉漏栓塞治疗动、静脉联合勃起功能障碍(ED)的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:2019年10月1日至2022年9月30日进行单中心观察研究,纳入26例对磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE5i)耐药且经勃起相关动脉血管重建术后无明显临床获益的ED患者。动脉血运重建术后458±424天进行静脉漏栓塞治疗。根据彩色多普勒血流分析、计算机断层血管造影和计算机断层海绵体造影证实动脉阻塞和静脉泄漏。主要安全终点是手术后6周的任何主要不良事件。主要可行性终点定义为干预后6周随访时IIEF-6(国际勃起功能指数-6)评分改善≥4分。结果:所有患者手术成功,随访无重大不良事件发生。在6周的随访中,3/26(11.5%)的患者仅在动脉血运重建术后达到了主要可行性终点。在额外静脉栓塞6周后,17/26(65.4%)的患者达到了主要可行性终点。结论:对于因混合动静脉疾病而对PDE5i无反应的血管源性ED患者,单纯动脉血运重建术后临床改善不足,静脉漏栓塞具有额外的临床改善和治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone.

Purpose: To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).

Materials and methods: Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.

Results: Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.

Conclusion: Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信