评估心理汇报模型的组成部分和有效实施,及其对医疗保健专业人员压力管理技能、心理健康和临床表现的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116118
Samuel Baum, Philip Lee, Muhammad Usman Awan, Samrah Mitha, Heli Patel, William S Havron, Adel Elkbuli
{"title":"评估心理汇报模型的组成部分和有效实施,及其对医疗保健专业人员压力管理技能、心理健康和临床表现的影响。","authors":"Samuel Baum, Philip Lee, Muhammad Usman Awan, Samrah Mitha, Heli Patel, William S Havron, Adel Elkbuli","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess various models of psychological debriefing, their benefits, and the impact of their implementation on medical trainees & healthcare professionals' stress management skills, mental well-being, and clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review queried PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for articles regarding psychological debriefing in medical education published through May 2024. Included studies that assessed the utilization, implementation, and effectiveness of various psychological debriefing models in the hospital setting among nursing staff, medical trainees, and attending physicians. Outcomes evaluated were successful debriefing models, associated benefits, and attendees' attitudes toward implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included. In all psychological debriefing models, attendees had improved coping skills following a challenging clinical scenario and supported the future use of these sessions. However, several barriers to the success of these sessions like untrained facilitators and insufficient time devoted have been noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological debriefing sessions assisted attendees cope with stressful situations, improved self-confidence, and advocate for themselves. Different models of psychological debriefing can be implemented depending on the resources of each facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of psychological debriefing models' components & effective implementation, and its impact on healthcare professionals stress management skills, mental wellbeing, and clinical performance.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Baum, Philip Lee, Muhammad Usman Awan, Samrah Mitha, Heli Patel, William S Havron, Adel Elkbuli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to assess various models of psychological debriefing, their benefits, and the impact of their implementation on medical trainees & healthcare professionals' stress management skills, mental well-being, and clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review queried PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for articles regarding psychological debriefing in medical education published through May 2024. Included studies that assessed the utilization, implementation, and effectiveness of various psychological debriefing models in the hospital setting among nursing staff, medical trainees, and attending physicians. Outcomes evaluated were successful debriefing models, associated benefits, and attendees' attitudes toward implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included. In all psychological debriefing models, attendees had improved coping skills following a challenging clinical scenario and supported the future use of these sessions. However, several barriers to the success of these sessions like untrained facilitators and insufficient time devoted have been noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological debriefing sessions assisted attendees cope with stressful situations, improved self-confidence, and advocate for themselves. Different models of psychological debriefing can be implemented depending on the resources of each facility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"116118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在评估各种心理述职模式、其效益,以及其实施对医疗受训人员和医疗保健专业人员压力管理技能、心理健康和临床表现的影响。方法:本综述查询了PubMed、ProQuest、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar数据库,检索了截至2024年5月发表的有关医学教育中心理汇报的文章。包括评估医院环境中护理人员、医疗实习生和主治医生的各种心理汇报模式的使用、实施和有效性的研究。评估的结果是成功的汇报模式、相关的利益和与会者对实施的态度。结果:纳入16项研究。在所有的心理汇报模型中,参与者在具有挑战性的临床场景后的应对技能都有所提高,并支持这些课程的未来使用。然而,已经注意到这些会议成功的几个障碍,如未经训练的调解员和投入的时间不足。结论:心理汇报有助于与会者应对压力情况,提高自信心,并为自己辩护。根据每个设施的资源,可以实施不同的心理汇报模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of psychological debriefing models' components & effective implementation, and its impact on healthcare professionals stress management skills, mental wellbeing, and clinical performance.

Introduction: This study aims to assess various models of psychological debriefing, their benefits, and the impact of their implementation on medical trainees & healthcare professionals' stress management skills, mental well-being, and clinical performance.

Methods: This review queried PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for articles regarding psychological debriefing in medical education published through May 2024. Included studies that assessed the utilization, implementation, and effectiveness of various psychological debriefing models in the hospital setting among nursing staff, medical trainees, and attending physicians. Outcomes evaluated were successful debriefing models, associated benefits, and attendees' attitudes toward implementation.

Results: Sixteen studies were included. In all psychological debriefing models, attendees had improved coping skills following a challenging clinical scenario and supported the future use of these sessions. However, several barriers to the success of these sessions like untrained facilitators and insufficient time devoted have been noted.

Conclusion: Psychological debriefing sessions assisted attendees cope with stressful situations, improved self-confidence, and advocate for themselves. Different models of psychological debriefing can be implemented depending on the resources of each facility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信