关于“μ-阿片受体配体(S)-美沙酮独特的药效学性质和低滥用倾向”致编辑的回复

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Marjorie R. Levinstein, Paulo A. De Oliveira, Nil Casajuana-Martin, Cesar Quiroz, Reece C. Budinich, Rana Rais, William Rea, Emilya N. Ventriglia, Natàlia Llopart, Verònica Casadó-Anguera, Estefanía Moreno, Donna Walther, Grant C. Glatfelter, David Weinshenker, Carlos A. Zarate, Vicent Casadó, Michael H. Baumann, Leonardo Pardo, Sergi Ferré, Michael Michaelides
{"title":"关于“μ-阿片受体配体(S)-美沙酮独特的药效学性质和低滥用倾向”致编辑的回复","authors":"Marjorie R. Levinstein, Paulo A. De Oliveira, Nil Casajuana-Martin, Cesar Quiroz, Reece C. Budinich, Rana Rais, William Rea, Emilya N. Ventriglia, Natàlia Llopart, Verònica Casadó-Anguera, Estefanía Moreno, Donna Walther, Grant C. Glatfelter, David Weinshenker, Carlos A. Zarate, Vicent Casadó, Michael H. Baumann, Leonardo Pardo, Sergi Ferré, Michael Michaelides","doi":"10.1038/s41380-024-02864-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We want to thank Pappagallo et al. [1] for their commentary about our recent article [2] which delved into the pharmacodynamic divergence of (R)- and (S)-methadone. Based on our experimental findings, we concluded that (S)-methadone, like (R,S)-methadone and (R)-methadone, is an agonist at the μ opioid receptor (MOR) but with much lower potency. Importantly, (S)-methadone exhibits a unique pharmacodynamic effect by acting as a MOR antagonist when MOR is complexed with the galanin 1 receptor (Gal<sub>1</sub>R). Since our previous studies showed that MOR-Gal<sub>1</sub>R heteromers mediate the dopaminergic effects of opioids [3], this specific antagonist property of (S)-methadone explains the low efficacy of (R,S)-methadone at activating the dopaminergic system and at eliciting euphoric effects. Accordingly, at sufficient doses/concentrations, (S)-methadone counteracts the locomotor activating and dopamine releasing effects of (R)-methadone. While (S)-methadone may act as an antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), the drug concentration needed to achieve this effect is higher than what is needed to interact with MORs in vivo. As such, we stated “The currently assumed role of NMDAR blockade in the purported antidepressant effects of (S)-MTD should be reframed in the context of its MOR agonistic properties.” Pappagallo et al. [1] disagreed with this statement. We address their comments below.</p><p>Our hot plate findings are a key component of the MOR agonist effects of (S)-methadone, but they are not the only evidence we provided. (S)-methadone also produces hypothermia and partial catalepsy [2], two prototypical effects of MOR agonists in rats. We also used [<sup>35</sup>S]GTPγS binding in rat brain sections to show that (S)-methadone increases GPCR activity in the striatum at a concentration that does not interact with NMDARs, and that this response was blocked by pretreatment with the preferential MOR antagonist naltrexone. Since the [<sup>35</sup>S]GTPγS assay is specific to GPCRs and does not involve ion channel activation or inhibition, we conclude that this activation is mediated by opioid receptors, most likely MORs. We also used BRET in transfected cells to show that (S)-methadone acts as an agonist at MOR. Finally, we found that 30 mg/kg (S)-methadone, a dose used to produce antidepressant-like effects in rats (10–40 mg/kg) [4, 5], occupies nearly 80% of striatal MORs without significant occupancy of NMDARs, using an assay which has previously shown occupancy by ketamine at these receptors [6]. Thus, we used diverse and independent approaches to confirm that (S)-methadone binds to and activates MORs at doses/concentrations that do not bind NMDARs in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to “Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Unique pharmacodynamic properties and low abuse liability of the μ-opioid receptor ligand (S)-methadone’”\",\"authors\":\"Marjorie R. Levinstein, Paulo A. De Oliveira, Nil Casajuana-Martin, Cesar Quiroz, Reece C. Budinich, Rana Rais, William Rea, Emilya N. Ventriglia, Natàlia Llopart, Verònica Casadó-Anguera, Estefanía Moreno, Donna Walther, Grant C. Glatfelter, David Weinshenker, Carlos A. Zarate, Vicent Casadó, Michael H. Baumann, Leonardo Pardo, Sergi Ferré, Michael Michaelides\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41380-024-02864-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We want to thank Pappagallo et al. [1] for their commentary about our recent article [2] which delved into the pharmacodynamic divergence of (R)- and (S)-methadone. Based on our experimental findings, we concluded that (S)-methadone, like (R,S)-methadone and (R)-methadone, is an agonist at the μ opioid receptor (MOR) but with much lower potency. Importantly, (S)-methadone exhibits a unique pharmacodynamic effect by acting as a MOR antagonist when MOR is complexed with the galanin 1 receptor (Gal<sub>1</sub>R). Since our previous studies showed that MOR-Gal<sub>1</sub>R heteromers mediate the dopaminergic effects of opioids [3], this specific antagonist property of (S)-methadone explains the low efficacy of (R,S)-methadone at activating the dopaminergic system and at eliciting euphoric effects. Accordingly, at sufficient doses/concentrations, (S)-methadone counteracts the locomotor activating and dopamine releasing effects of (R)-methadone. While (S)-methadone may act as an antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), the drug concentration needed to achieve this effect is higher than what is needed to interact with MORs in vivo. As such, we stated “The currently assumed role of NMDAR blockade in the purported antidepressant effects of (S)-MTD should be reframed in the context of its MOR agonistic properties.” Pappagallo et al. [1] disagreed with this statement. We address their comments below.</p><p>Our hot plate findings are a key component of the MOR agonist effects of (S)-methadone, but they are not the only evidence we provided. (S)-methadone also produces hypothermia and partial catalepsy [2], two prototypical effects of MOR agonists in rats. We also used [<sup>35</sup>S]GTPγS binding in rat brain sections to show that (S)-methadone increases GPCR activity in the striatum at a concentration that does not interact with NMDARs, and that this response was blocked by pretreatment with the preferential MOR antagonist naltrexone. Since the [<sup>35</sup>S]GTPγS assay is specific to GPCRs and does not involve ion channel activation or inhibition, we conclude that this activation is mediated by opioid receptors, most likely MORs. We also used BRET in transfected cells to show that (S)-methadone acts as an agonist at MOR. Finally, we found that 30 mg/kg (S)-methadone, a dose used to produce antidepressant-like effects in rats (10–40 mg/kg) [4, 5], occupies nearly 80% of striatal MORs without significant occupancy of NMDARs, using an assay which has previously shown occupancy by ketamine at these receptors [6]. Thus, we used diverse and independent approaches to confirm that (S)-methadone binds to and activates MORs at doses/concentrations that do not bind NMDARs in vivo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02864-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02864-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们要感谢Pappagallo等人对我们最近的文章b[2]的评论,该文章深入研究了(R)-美沙酮和(S)-美沙酮的药效学差异。实验结果表明,(S)-美沙酮与(R,S)-美沙酮和(R)-美沙酮一样,是μ阿片受体(MOR)的激动剂,但效价低得多。重要的是,当MOR与丙氨酸1受体(Gal1R)络合时,(S)-美沙酮表现出独特的药效学效应,可作为MOR拮抗剂。由于我们之前的研究表明,morr - gal1r异构体介导阿片类药物[3]的多巴胺能作用,(S)-美沙酮的这种特异性拮抗剂性质解释了(R,S)-美沙酮在激活多巴胺能系统和引发愉悦作用方面的低功效。因此,在足够的剂量/浓度下,(S)-美沙酮可以抵消(R)-美沙酮的运动激活和多巴胺释放作用。虽然(S)-美沙酮可能作为n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)的拮抗剂,但实现这种作用所需的药物浓度高于体内与MORs相互作用所需的药物浓度。因此,我们声明:“目前认为NMDAR阻断剂在(S)-MTD的抗抑郁作用中的作用应该在其more激动特性的背景下重新定义。”Pappagallo等人不同意这种说法。我们在下面回应他们的评论。我们的热板研究结果是(S)-美沙酮MOR激动剂作用的关键组成部分,但它们并不是我们提供的唯一证据。(S)-美沙酮还会产生低温和部分麻痹,这是MOR激动剂对大鼠的两种典型效应。我们还在大鼠脑切片中使用[35S] gtp - γ - S结合来表明(S)-美沙酮在不与NMDARs相互作用的浓度下增加纹状体中GPCR活性,并且这种反应被优先使用MOR拮抗剂纳曲酮预处理阻断。由于[35S]GTPγS测定是特异性的gpcr,不涉及离子通道激活或抑制,我们得出结论,这种激活是由阿片受体介导的,最有可能是MORs。我们还在转染的细胞中使用BRET来显示(S)-美沙酮在MOR中作为激动剂。最后,我们发现30mg /kg (S)-美沙酮,一种用于在大鼠中产生抗抑郁样作用的剂量(10 - 40mg /kg)[4,5],占据了纹状体MORs的近80%,而没有显著占用NMDARs,使用先前显示氯胺酮占用这些受体[6]的实验。因此,我们使用了多种独立的方法来证实(S)-美沙酮在体内不结合NMDARs的剂量/浓度下与MORs结合并激活MORs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reply to “Letter to the Editor regarding ‘Unique pharmacodynamic properties and low abuse liability of the μ-opioid receptor ligand (S)-methadone’”

We want to thank Pappagallo et al. [1] for their commentary about our recent article [2] which delved into the pharmacodynamic divergence of (R)- and (S)-methadone. Based on our experimental findings, we concluded that (S)-methadone, like (R,S)-methadone and (R)-methadone, is an agonist at the μ opioid receptor (MOR) but with much lower potency. Importantly, (S)-methadone exhibits a unique pharmacodynamic effect by acting as a MOR antagonist when MOR is complexed with the galanin 1 receptor (Gal1R). Since our previous studies showed that MOR-Gal1R heteromers mediate the dopaminergic effects of opioids [3], this specific antagonist property of (S)-methadone explains the low efficacy of (R,S)-methadone at activating the dopaminergic system and at eliciting euphoric effects. Accordingly, at sufficient doses/concentrations, (S)-methadone counteracts the locomotor activating and dopamine releasing effects of (R)-methadone. While (S)-methadone may act as an antagonist at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), the drug concentration needed to achieve this effect is higher than what is needed to interact with MORs in vivo. As such, we stated “The currently assumed role of NMDAR blockade in the purported antidepressant effects of (S)-MTD should be reframed in the context of its MOR agonistic properties.” Pappagallo et al. [1] disagreed with this statement. We address their comments below.

Our hot plate findings are a key component of the MOR agonist effects of (S)-methadone, but they are not the only evidence we provided. (S)-methadone also produces hypothermia and partial catalepsy [2], two prototypical effects of MOR agonists in rats. We also used [35S]GTPγS binding in rat brain sections to show that (S)-methadone increases GPCR activity in the striatum at a concentration that does not interact with NMDARs, and that this response was blocked by pretreatment with the preferential MOR antagonist naltrexone. Since the [35S]GTPγS assay is specific to GPCRs and does not involve ion channel activation or inhibition, we conclude that this activation is mediated by opioid receptors, most likely MORs. We also used BRET in transfected cells to show that (S)-methadone acts as an agonist at MOR. Finally, we found that 30 mg/kg (S)-methadone, a dose used to produce antidepressant-like effects in rats (10–40 mg/kg) [4, 5], occupies nearly 80% of striatal MORs without significant occupancy of NMDARs, using an assay which has previously shown occupancy by ketamine at these receptors [6]. Thus, we used diverse and independent approaches to confirm that (S)-methadone binds to and activates MORs at doses/concentrations that do not bind NMDARs in vivo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信