生成式人工智能导论:情境化未来。

IF 3.2
Rajendra Singh, Ji Yeon Kim, Eric F Glassy, Rajesh C Dash, Victor Brodsky, Jansen Seheult, M E de Baca, Qiangqiang Gu, Shannon Hoekstra, Bobbi S Pritt
{"title":"生成式人工智能导论:情境化未来。","authors":"Rajendra Singh, Ji Yeon Kim, Eric F Glassy, Rajesh C Dash, Victor Brodsky, Jansen Seheult, M E de Baca, Qiangqiang Gu, Shannon Hoekstra, Bobbi S Pritt","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0221-RA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is a promising new technology with the potential to transform communication and workflows in health care and pathology. Although new technologies offer advantages, they also come with risks that users, particularly early adopters, must recognize. Given the fast pace of GAI developments, pathologists may find it challenging to stay current with the terminology, technical underpinnings, and latest advancements. Building this knowledge base will enable pathologists to grasp the potential risks and impacts that GAI may have on the future practice of pathology.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To present key elements of GAI development, evaluation, and implementation in a way that is accessible to pathologists and relevant to laboratory applications.</p><p><strong>Data sources.—: </strong>Information was gathered from recent studies and reviews from PubMed and arXiv.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>GAI offers many potential benefits for practicing pathologists. However, the use of GAI in clinical practice requires rigorous oversight and continuous refinement to fully realize its potential and mitigate inherent risks. The performance of GAI is highly dependent on the quality and diversity of the training and fine-tuning data, which can also propagate biases if not carefully managed. Ethical concerns, particularly regarding patient privacy and autonomy, must be addressed to ensure responsible use. By harnessing these emergent technologies, pathologists will be well placed to continue forward as leaders in diagnostic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"112-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence: Contextualizing the Future.\",\"authors\":\"Rajendra Singh, Ji Yeon Kim, Eric F Glassy, Rajesh C Dash, Victor Brodsky, Jansen Seheult, M E de Baca, Qiangqiang Gu, Shannon Hoekstra, Bobbi S Pritt\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2024-0221-RA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is a promising new technology with the potential to transform communication and workflows in health care and pathology. Although new technologies offer advantages, they also come with risks that users, particularly early adopters, must recognize. Given the fast pace of GAI developments, pathologists may find it challenging to stay current with the terminology, technical underpinnings, and latest advancements. Building this knowledge base will enable pathologists to grasp the potential risks and impacts that GAI may have on the future practice of pathology.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To present key elements of GAI development, evaluation, and implementation in a way that is accessible to pathologists and relevant to laboratory applications.</p><p><strong>Data sources.—: </strong>Information was gathered from recent studies and reviews from PubMed and arXiv.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>GAI offers many potential benefits for practicing pathologists. However, the use of GAI in clinical practice requires rigorous oversight and continuous refinement to fully realize its potential and mitigate inherent risks. The performance of GAI is highly dependent on the quality and diversity of the training and fine-tuning data, which can also propagate biases if not carefully managed. Ethical concerns, particularly regarding patient privacy and autonomy, must be addressed to ensure responsible use. By harnessing these emergent technologies, pathologists will be well placed to continue forward as leaders in diagnostic medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"112-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0221-RA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0221-RA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。-:生成式人工智能(GAI)是一项很有前途的新技术,有可能改变医疗保健和病理学领域的沟通和工作流程。尽管新技术带来了优势,但它们也带来了风险,用户,尤其是早期采用者,必须认识到这一点。鉴于GAI发展的快速步伐,病理学家可能会发现跟上术语、技术基础和最新进展是一项挑战。建立这一知识库将使病理学家能够掌握GAI可能对未来病理实践产生的潜在风险和影响。-:以病理学家和实验室应用相关的方式介绍GAI开发、评估和实施的关键要素。数据源。-:信息收集自PubMed和arxiv最近的研究和评论。GAI为执业病理学家提供了许多潜在的好处。然而,GAI在临床实践中的使用需要严格的监督和持续的改进,以充分发挥其潜力并减轻固有风险。GAI的性能高度依赖于训练和微调数据的质量和多样性,如果不仔细管理,这些数据也会传播偏见。必须解决伦理问题,特别是关于患者隐私和自主权的问题,以确保负责任的使用。通过利用这些新兴技术,病理学家将很好地继续作为诊断医学的领导者前进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence: Contextualizing the Future.

Context.—: Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is a promising new technology with the potential to transform communication and workflows in health care and pathology. Although new technologies offer advantages, they also come with risks that users, particularly early adopters, must recognize. Given the fast pace of GAI developments, pathologists may find it challenging to stay current with the terminology, technical underpinnings, and latest advancements. Building this knowledge base will enable pathologists to grasp the potential risks and impacts that GAI may have on the future practice of pathology.

Objective.—: To present key elements of GAI development, evaluation, and implementation in a way that is accessible to pathologists and relevant to laboratory applications.

Data sources.—: Information was gathered from recent studies and reviews from PubMed and arXiv.

Conclusions.—: GAI offers many potential benefits for practicing pathologists. However, the use of GAI in clinical practice requires rigorous oversight and continuous refinement to fully realize its potential and mitigate inherent risks. The performance of GAI is highly dependent on the quality and diversity of the training and fine-tuning data, which can also propagate biases if not carefully managed. Ethical concerns, particularly regarding patient privacy and autonomy, must be addressed to ensure responsible use. By harnessing these emergent technologies, pathologists will be well placed to continue forward as leaders in diagnostic medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信