尺-基底动静脉瘘用于血液透析:15年综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ana Esther Sirvent, María Rosa Vigueras-Hernández, Ricardo Enríquez, Juan Mariano Pérez-Abad, Antonio Pérez-Pérez, Guadalupe Ruiz-Merino, Alberto J Andreu-Muñoz
{"title":"尺-基底动静脉瘘用于血液透析:15年综述。","authors":"Ana Esther Sirvent, María Rosa Vigueras-Hernández, Ricardo Enríquez, Juan Mariano Pérez-Abad, Antonio Pérez-Pérez, Guadalupe Ruiz-Merino, Alberto J Andreu-Muñoz","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal forearm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis (HD) include radiocephalic fistulas (RCFs) and ulnar-basilic fistulas (UBFs). However, due to the unique anatomical peculiarities of the latter approach, UBFs are only established in a limited subset of patients undergoing vascular access procedures. This study aimed to present a retrospective case series detailing the creation of UBFs, emphasizing both the technical challenges and clinical outcomes associated with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of UBFs created between 2008 and 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, patency, functionality, and outcomes. Adequate blood flow and personalized Kt/Vurea levels were prerequisites for defining UBF functionality for HD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 253 patients receiving HD, 82.2% had an AVF, with only 3.3% (n = 5) of the 150 distal AVFs functional for HD being UBFs. In this series, a total of 11 UBF fistulas were created, with nine patients experiencing an immediate thrill. Among those with UBF failure, three patients were aged > 85 years, and three had concurrent diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. The survival rate in the UBF group correlated with the duration of dialysis in the three patients for whom the UBF was the sole AVF, with one patient achieving a remarkably prolonged period of > 10 years. No incidences of ischemia, hand edema, or ulnar nerve lesions were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the difficulties experienced in achieving functional UBFs for HD are highlighted in this long-term perspective, its safety and durability make it a viable option in managing an increasingly comorbid patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis: A 15-Year Overview.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Esther Sirvent, María Rosa Vigueras-Hernández, Ricardo Enríquez, Juan Mariano Pérez-Abad, Antonio Pérez-Pérez, Guadalupe Ruiz-Merino, Alberto J Andreu-Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sdi.13231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal forearm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis (HD) include radiocephalic fistulas (RCFs) and ulnar-basilic fistulas (UBFs). However, due to the unique anatomical peculiarities of the latter approach, UBFs are only established in a limited subset of patients undergoing vascular access procedures. This study aimed to present a retrospective case series detailing the creation of UBFs, emphasizing both the technical challenges and clinical outcomes associated with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of UBFs created between 2008 and 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, patency, functionality, and outcomes. Adequate blood flow and personalized Kt/Vurea levels were prerequisites for defining UBF functionality for HD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 253 patients receiving HD, 82.2% had an AVF, with only 3.3% (n = 5) of the 150 distal AVFs functional for HD being UBFs. In this series, a total of 11 UBF fistulas were created, with nine patients experiencing an immediate thrill. Among those with UBF failure, three patients were aged > 85 years, and three had concurrent diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. The survival rate in the UBF group correlated with the duration of dialysis in the three patients for whom the UBF was the sole AVF, with one patient achieving a remarkably prolonged period of > 10 years. No incidences of ischemia, hand edema, or ulnar nerve lesions were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the difficulties experienced in achieving functional UBFs for HD are highlighted in this long-term perspective, its safety and durability make it a viable option in managing an increasingly comorbid patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:血液透析(HD)的前臂远端动静脉瘘(AVFs)包括放射性头瘘(rcf)和尺基底瘘(UBFs)。然而,由于后一种入路的独特解剖特点,ubf仅在接受血管通路手术的有限患者中建立。本研究旨在提供一个回顾性的病例系列,详细介绍了UBFs的创建,强调了与该方法相关的技术挑战和临床结果。方法:我们对2008年至2023年间创建的ubf进行了回顾性审查。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、合并症、通畅、功能和结果。充足的血流量和个性化的Kt/ v尿素水平是确定HD UBF功能的先决条件。结果:253例接受HD治疗的患者中,82.2%有AVF,在150例远端AVF中,只有3.3% (n = 5)是ubf。在这个系列中,共创建了11个UBF瘘管,其中9个患者立即感到兴奋。在UBF衰竭患者中,3例患者年龄在50 ~ 85岁之间,3例合并糖尿病、外周血管疾病和缺血性心脏病。在以UBF为唯一AVF的3例患者中,UBF组的生存率与透析持续时间相关,其中1例患者显著延长了10年。没有发生缺血、手部水肿或尺神经病变。结论:虽然从长期角度来看,实现HD功能性UBFs的困难突出,但其安全性和耐久性使其成为管理越来越多合并症患者群体的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis: A 15-Year Overview.

Introduction: Distal forearm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis (HD) include radiocephalic fistulas (RCFs) and ulnar-basilic fistulas (UBFs). However, due to the unique anatomical peculiarities of the latter approach, UBFs are only established in a limited subset of patients undergoing vascular access procedures. This study aimed to present a retrospective case series detailing the creation of UBFs, emphasizing both the technical challenges and clinical outcomes associated with this approach.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of UBFs created between 2008 and 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, patency, functionality, and outcomes. Adequate blood flow and personalized Kt/Vurea levels were prerequisites for defining UBF functionality for HD.

Results: Among 253 patients receiving HD, 82.2% had an AVF, with only 3.3% (n = 5) of the 150 distal AVFs functional for HD being UBFs. In this series, a total of 11 UBF fistulas were created, with nine patients experiencing an immediate thrill. Among those with UBF failure, three patients were aged > 85 years, and three had concurrent diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. The survival rate in the UBF group correlated with the duration of dialysis in the three patients for whom the UBF was the sole AVF, with one patient achieving a remarkably prolonged period of > 10 years. No incidences of ischemia, hand edema, or ulnar nerve lesions were noted.

Conclusion: While the difficulties experienced in achieving functional UBFs for HD are highlighted in this long-term perspective, its safety and durability make it a viable option in managing an increasingly comorbid patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信