以家庭为基础的肺康复计划对COPD患者的保真度。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Simone Dal Corso, Anne E Holland, Johnson George, Michael J Abramson, Grant Russell, Nick Zwar, Billie Bonevski, Jaycie Perryman, Narelle S Cox
{"title":"以家庭为基础的肺康复计划对COPD患者的保真度。","authors":"Simone Dal Corso, Anne E Holland, Johnson George, Michael J Abramson, Grant Russell, Nick Zwar, Billie Bonevski, Jaycie Perryman, Narelle S Cox","doi":"10.1177/14799731241307247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is highly effective but underutilised. Pathways to home-based PR (HBPR) from general practice could improve utilisation, but program fidelity in this setting is unknown. This study aimed to explore the fidelity of HBPR in people referred from general practice. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary analysis of intervention-group data from two-arm cluster RCT (RADICALS-interdisciplinary intervention for people with COPD including smoking cessation support, home medicine reviews and 8-weeks HBPR). HBPR fidelity assessed by the extent to which exercise training was prescribed according to protocol. Completion of HBPR and contributing factors were determined. <b>Results:</b> 107 participants (68% of intervention group) were referred to HBPR, with <i>n</i> = 75 (70%) commencing the program (mean age 68 years, FEV<sub>1</sub> 65% predicted, median mMRC 1). Aerobic training was prescribed according to protocol for 74% of participants in week one, and on average 89% of participants in weeks 2-8. Resistance training was prescribed according to protocol for 98% and 88% of participants (Week 1 and Weeks 2-8, respectively). Rehabilitation completers (<i>n</i> = 57, 76%) were 26 times more likely to have attended the Week 2 phone call (95% CI 2-352). Clinically meaningful improvements were achieved in health-related quality of life (SGRQ) and health status (CAT) following rehabilitation. <b>Conclusion:</b> PR program fidelity can be maintained when delivering HBPR to people with COPD referred directly from general practice. Early engagement with PR may be key to supporting rehabilitation completion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241307247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fidelity of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in people with COPD referred from primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Dal Corso, Anne E Holland, Johnson George, Michael J Abramson, Grant Russell, Nick Zwar, Billie Bonevski, Jaycie Perryman, Narelle S Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731241307247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is highly effective but underutilised. Pathways to home-based PR (HBPR) from general practice could improve utilisation, but program fidelity in this setting is unknown. This study aimed to explore the fidelity of HBPR in people referred from general practice. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary analysis of intervention-group data from two-arm cluster RCT (RADICALS-interdisciplinary intervention for people with COPD including smoking cessation support, home medicine reviews and 8-weeks HBPR). HBPR fidelity assessed by the extent to which exercise training was prescribed according to protocol. Completion of HBPR and contributing factors were determined. <b>Results:</b> 107 participants (68% of intervention group) were referred to HBPR, with <i>n</i> = 75 (70%) commencing the program (mean age 68 years, FEV<sub>1</sub> 65% predicted, median mMRC 1). Aerobic training was prescribed according to protocol for 74% of participants in week one, and on average 89% of participants in weeks 2-8. Resistance training was prescribed according to protocol for 98% and 88% of participants (Week 1 and Weeks 2-8, respectively). Rehabilitation completers (<i>n</i> = 57, 76%) were 26 times more likely to have attended the Week 2 phone call (95% CI 2-352). Clinically meaningful improvements were achieved in health-related quality of life (SGRQ) and health status (CAT) following rehabilitation. <b>Conclusion:</b> PR program fidelity can be maintained when delivering HBPR to people with COPD referred directly from general practice. Early engagement with PR may be key to supporting rehabilitation completion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"14799731241307247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241307247\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241307247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺康复(PR)是一种非常有效但未被充分利用的方法。从一般实践到家庭PR (HBPR)的途径可以提高利用率,但这种情况下的程序保真度尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨HBPR在全科转诊人群中的保真度。方法:二级分析干预组数据来自两组随机对照试验(radicals - COPD患者跨学科干预,包括戒烟支持、家庭医学回顾和8周HBPR)。HBPR保真度通过根据方案规定运动训练的程度来评估。确定HBPR的完成情况及影响因素。结果:107名参与者(干预组的68%)被转介到HBPR,其中75名(70%)开始该计划(平均年龄68岁,预测FEV1 65%,中位mMRC 1)。第一周74%的参与者根据协议进行有氧训练,2-8周平均89%的参与者根据协议进行有氧训练。98%和88%的参与者(分别为第1周和第2-8周)按照方案进行阻力训练。康复完成者(n = 57, 76%)参加第2周电话会议的可能性高出26倍(95% CI 2-352)。康复后与健康相关的生活质量(SGRQ)和健康状态(CAT)均有临床意义的改善。结论:对直接从全科医生转介的COPD患者实施HBPR时,PR程序的保真度可以保持。尽早参与公共关系可能是支持康复完成的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fidelity of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in people with COPD referred from primary care.

Purpose: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is highly effective but underutilised. Pathways to home-based PR (HBPR) from general practice could improve utilisation, but program fidelity in this setting is unknown. This study aimed to explore the fidelity of HBPR in people referred from general practice. Methods: Secondary analysis of intervention-group data from two-arm cluster RCT (RADICALS-interdisciplinary intervention for people with COPD including smoking cessation support, home medicine reviews and 8-weeks HBPR). HBPR fidelity assessed by the extent to which exercise training was prescribed according to protocol. Completion of HBPR and contributing factors were determined. Results: 107 participants (68% of intervention group) were referred to HBPR, with n = 75 (70%) commencing the program (mean age 68 years, FEV1 65% predicted, median mMRC 1). Aerobic training was prescribed according to protocol for 74% of participants in week one, and on average 89% of participants in weeks 2-8. Resistance training was prescribed according to protocol for 98% and 88% of participants (Week 1 and Weeks 2-8, respectively). Rehabilitation completers (n = 57, 76%) were 26 times more likely to have attended the Week 2 phone call (95% CI 2-352). Clinically meaningful improvements were achieved in health-related quality of life (SGRQ) and health status (CAT) following rehabilitation. Conclusion: PR program fidelity can be maintained when delivering HBPR to people with COPD referred directly from general practice. Early engagement with PR may be key to supporting rehabilitation completion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信