Lathan Liou, Judit García-González, Hei Man Wu, Zhe Wang, Clive J Hoggart, Amy R Kontorovich, Jason C Kovacic, Paul F O'Reilly
{"title":"冠状动脉疾病亚型的临床和基因组预测。","authors":"Lathan Liou, Judit García-González, Hei Man Wu, Zhe Wang, Clive J Hoggart, Amy R Kontorovich, Jason C Kovacic, Paul F O'Reilly","doi":"10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a complex, heterogeneous disease with distinct etiological mechanisms. These different etiologies may give rise to multiple subtypes of CAD that could benefit from alternative preventions and treatments. However, so far, there have been no systematic efforts to predict CAD subtypes using clinical and genetic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we trained and applied statistical models incorporating clinical and genetic factors to predict CAD subtypes in 26 036 patients with CAD in the UK Biobank. We performed external validation of the UK Biobank models in the US-based All of Us cohort (8598 patients with CAD). Subtypes were defined as high versus normal LDL (low-density lipoprotein) levels, high versus normal Lpa (lipoprotein A) levels, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, occlusive versus nonocclusive CAD, and stable versus unstable CAD. Clinical predictors included levels of ApoA, ApoB, HDL (high-density lipoprotein), triglycerides, and CRP (C-reactive protein). Genetic predictors were genome-wide and pathway-based polygenic risk scores (PRSs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that both clinical-only and genetic-only models can predict CAD subtypes, while combining clinical and genetic factors leads to greater predictive accuracy. Pathway-based PRSs had higher discriminatory power than genome-wide PRSs for the Lpa and LDL subtypes and provided insights into their etiologies. The 10-pathway PRS most predictive of the LDL subtype involved cholesterol metabolism. Pathway PRS models had poor generalizability to the All of Us cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, we present the first systematic demonstration that CAD subtypes can be distinguished by clinical and genomic risk factors, which could have important implications for stratified cardiovascular medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":8401,"journal":{"name":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology","volume":" ","pages":"90-103"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Genomic Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease Subtypes.\",\"authors\":\"Lathan Liou, Judit García-González, Hei Man Wu, Zhe Wang, Clive J Hoggart, Amy R Kontorovich, Jason C Kovacic, Paul F O'Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a complex, heterogeneous disease with distinct etiological mechanisms. These different etiologies may give rise to multiple subtypes of CAD that could benefit from alternative preventions and treatments. However, so far, there have been no systematic efforts to predict CAD subtypes using clinical and genetic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we trained and applied statistical models incorporating clinical and genetic factors to predict CAD subtypes in 26 036 patients with CAD in the UK Biobank. We performed external validation of the UK Biobank models in the US-based All of Us cohort (8598 patients with CAD). Subtypes were defined as high versus normal LDL (low-density lipoprotein) levels, high versus normal Lpa (lipoprotein A) levels, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, occlusive versus nonocclusive CAD, and stable versus unstable CAD. Clinical predictors included levels of ApoA, ApoB, HDL (high-density lipoprotein), triglycerides, and CRP (C-reactive protein). Genetic predictors were genome-wide and pathway-based polygenic risk scores (PRSs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that both clinical-only and genetic-only models can predict CAD subtypes, while combining clinical and genetic factors leads to greater predictive accuracy. Pathway-based PRSs had higher discriminatory power than genome-wide PRSs for the Lpa and LDL subtypes and provided insights into their etiologies. The 10-pathway PRS most predictive of the LDL subtype involved cholesterol metabolism. Pathway PRS models had poor generalizability to the All of Us cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, we present the first systematic demonstration that CAD subtypes can be distinguished by clinical and genomic risk factors, which could have important implications for stratified cardiovascular medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"90-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321846\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321846","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是一种复杂、异质性的疾病,具有独特的病因机制。这些不同的病因可能导致多种亚型的CAD,这些亚型可以从其他预防和治疗中获益。然而,到目前为止,还没有系统地利用临床和遗传因素来预测CAD亚型。方法:在这里,我们训练并应用结合临床和遗传因素的统计模型来预测英国生物银行26036例CAD患者的CAD亚型。我们在美国All of Us队列(8598例CAD患者)中对UK Biobank模型进行了外部验证。亚型被定义为高与正常LDL(低密度脂蛋白)水平、高与正常Lpa(脂蛋白A)水平、st段抬高型心肌梗死与非st段抬高型心肌梗死、闭塞型与非闭塞型CAD、稳定型与不稳定型CAD。临床预测指标包括ApoA、ApoB、HDL(高密度脂蛋白)、甘油三酯和CRP (c反应蛋白)水平。遗传预测因子是全基因组和基于通路的多基因风险评分(PRSs)。结果:结果表明,仅临床和仅遗传的模型都可以预测CAD亚型,而结合临床和遗传因素的预测准确性更高。对于Lpa和LDL亚型,基于通路的PRSs比全基因组PRSs具有更高的区分能力,并提供了对其病因的见解。最能预测LDL亚型的10通路PRS与胆固醇代谢有关。Pathway PRS模型对All of Us队列的通用性较差。结论:总之,我们首次系统地证明了CAD亚型可以通过临床和基因组危险因素来区分,这可能对分层心血管医学具有重要意义。
Clinical and Genomic Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease Subtypes.
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a complex, heterogeneous disease with distinct etiological mechanisms. These different etiologies may give rise to multiple subtypes of CAD that could benefit from alternative preventions and treatments. However, so far, there have been no systematic efforts to predict CAD subtypes using clinical and genetic factors.
Methods: Here, we trained and applied statistical models incorporating clinical and genetic factors to predict CAD subtypes in 26 036 patients with CAD in the UK Biobank. We performed external validation of the UK Biobank models in the US-based All of Us cohort (8598 patients with CAD). Subtypes were defined as high versus normal LDL (low-density lipoprotein) levels, high versus normal Lpa (lipoprotein A) levels, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, occlusive versus nonocclusive CAD, and stable versus unstable CAD. Clinical predictors included levels of ApoA, ApoB, HDL (high-density lipoprotein), triglycerides, and CRP (C-reactive protein). Genetic predictors were genome-wide and pathway-based polygenic risk scores (PRSs).
Results: Results showed that both clinical-only and genetic-only models can predict CAD subtypes, while combining clinical and genetic factors leads to greater predictive accuracy. Pathway-based PRSs had higher discriminatory power than genome-wide PRSs for the Lpa and LDL subtypes and provided insights into their etiologies. The 10-pathway PRS most predictive of the LDL subtype involved cholesterol metabolism. Pathway PRS models had poor generalizability to the All of Us cohort.
Conclusions: In summary, we present the first systematic demonstration that CAD subtypes can be distinguished by clinical and genomic risk factors, which could have important implications for stratified cardiovascular medicine.
期刊介绍:
The journal "Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology" (ATVB) is a scientific publication that focuses on the fields of vascular biology, atherosclerosis, and thrombosis. It is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, and other scholarly content related to these areas. The journal is published by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Stroke Association (ASA).
The journal was published bi-monthly until January 1992, after which it transitioned to a monthly publication schedule. The journal is aimed at a professional audience, including academic cardiologists, vascular biologists, physiologists, pharmacologists and hematologists.