靶向BCMA或GPRC5D的双特异性抗体对CAR - t细胞治疗后复发的骨髓瘤非常有效

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Maximilian Merz, Danai Dima, Hamza Hashmi, Nausheen Ahmed, Friedrich Stölzel, Tobias A. W. Holderried, Roland Fenk, Fabian Müller, Natalia Tovar, Aina Oliver-Cáldes, Kristin Rathje, James A. Davis, David Fandrei, Vladan Vucinic, Soraya Kharboutli, Ben-Niklas Baermann, Francis Ayuk, Uwe Platzbecker, Anca-Maria Albici, Nathalie Schub, Friederike Schmitz, Leyla Shune, Jack Khouri, Faiz Anwer, Shahzad Raza, Joseph McGuirk, Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Kimberly Green, Cyrus Khandanpour, Marcel Teichert, Barbara Jeker, Michele Hoffmann, Nicolaus Kröger, Bastian von Tresckow, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Thomas Pabst, Al-Ola Abdallah, Nico Gagelmann
{"title":"靶向BCMA或GPRC5D的双特异性抗体对CAR - t细胞治疗后复发的骨髓瘤非常有效","authors":"Maximilian Merz, Danai Dima, Hamza Hashmi, Nausheen Ahmed, Friedrich Stölzel, Tobias A. W. Holderried, Roland Fenk, Fabian Müller, Natalia Tovar, Aina Oliver-Cáldes, Kristin Rathje, James A. Davis, David Fandrei, Vladan Vucinic, Soraya Kharboutli, Ben-Niklas Baermann, Francis Ayuk, Uwe Platzbecker, Anca-Maria Albici, Nathalie Schub, Friederike Schmitz, Leyla Shune, Jack Khouri, Faiz Anwer, Shahzad Raza, Joseph McGuirk, Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Kimberly Green, Cyrus Khandanpour, Marcel Teichert, Barbara Jeker, Michele Hoffmann, Nicolaus Kröger, Bastian von Tresckow, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Thomas Pabst, Al-Ola Abdallah, Nico Gagelmann","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01197-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the astonishing outcomes after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), most patients eventually relapse. There are only limited data available on salvage therapies following relapse after BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Here, we analyzed outcomes of post-CAR T-cell therapy relapse and impact of different salvage strategies in an international cohort of 139 patients (<i>n</i> = 130 ide-cel, <i>n</i> = 9 cilta-cel), receiving talquetamab (<i>n</i> = 28), teclistamab (<i>n</i> = 37), combinations of immunomodulating drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) or CD38 monoclonal antibodies (<i>n</i> = 43), and others (<i>n</i> = 31). The median time to relapse after CAR T-cell therapy was 5 months, 53% had the extramedullary disease (EMD) at relapse, associated with dismal post-relapse outcome (<i>P</i> = 0.005). Overall response and complete response upon salvage therapies were 79% and 39% for talquetamab, 64% and 32% for teclistamab, 30% and 0% for IMiDs/PIs/CD38, and 26% and 3% for others (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Duration of response, as well as median survival, was significantly improved with bispecific antibodies (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Bispecific antibodies seemed to overcome the poor prognosis associated with early relapse and EMD, and were independent predictors for improved survival in multivariable analysis. In summary, these results suggest bispecific antibodies as the standard of care for relapse after CAR T-cell therapy for RRMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA or GPRC5D are highly effective in relapsed myeloma after CAR T-cell therapy\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Merz, Danai Dima, Hamza Hashmi, Nausheen Ahmed, Friedrich Stölzel, Tobias A. W. Holderried, Roland Fenk, Fabian Müller, Natalia Tovar, Aina Oliver-Cáldes, Kristin Rathje, James A. Davis, David Fandrei, Vladan Vucinic, Soraya Kharboutli, Ben-Niklas Baermann, Francis Ayuk, Uwe Platzbecker, Anca-Maria Albici, Nathalie Schub, Friederike Schmitz, Leyla Shune, Jack Khouri, Faiz Anwer, Shahzad Raza, Joseph McGuirk, Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Kimberly Green, Cyrus Khandanpour, Marcel Teichert, Barbara Jeker, Michele Hoffmann, Nicolaus Kröger, Bastian von Tresckow, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Thomas Pabst, Al-Ola Abdallah, Nico Gagelmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-024-01197-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite the astonishing outcomes after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), most patients eventually relapse. There are only limited data available on salvage therapies following relapse after BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Here, we analyzed outcomes of post-CAR T-cell therapy relapse and impact of different salvage strategies in an international cohort of 139 patients (<i>n</i> = 130 ide-cel, <i>n</i> = 9 cilta-cel), receiving talquetamab (<i>n</i> = 28), teclistamab (<i>n</i> = 37), combinations of immunomodulating drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) or CD38 monoclonal antibodies (<i>n</i> = 43), and others (<i>n</i> = 31). The median time to relapse after CAR T-cell therapy was 5 months, 53% had the extramedullary disease (EMD) at relapse, associated with dismal post-relapse outcome (<i>P</i> = 0.005). Overall response and complete response upon salvage therapies were 79% and 39% for talquetamab, 64% and 32% for teclistamab, 30% and 0% for IMiDs/PIs/CD38, and 26% and 3% for others (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Duration of response, as well as median survival, was significantly improved with bispecific antibodies (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Bispecific antibodies seemed to overcome the poor prognosis associated with early relapse and EMD, and were independent predictors for improved survival in multivariable analysis. In summary, these results suggest bispecific antibodies as the standard of care for relapse after CAR T-cell therapy for RRMM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01197-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01197-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞治疗复发性难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)的结果令人惊讶,但大多数患者最终会复发。在bcma导向的CAR - t细胞治疗后复发后的挽救治疗方面,只有有限的数据。在这里,我们分析了139例国际队列患者(n = 130个ide- cell, n = 9个cilta- cell)的car - t细胞治疗后复发的结果和不同挽救策略的影响,接受了talquetamab (n = 28), teclistamab (n = 37),免疫调节药物(IMiDs),蛋白酶体抑制剂(pi)或CD38单克隆抗体(n = 43)和其他(n = 31)。CAR - t细胞治疗后的中位复发时间为5个月,53%的患者在复发时出现髓外疾病(EMD),与复发后预后惨淡相关(P = 0.005)。挽救性治疗的总缓解率和完全缓解率分别为talquetamab的79%和39%,teclistamab的64%和32%,IMiDs/ pi /CD38的30%和0%,其他治疗的26%和3% (P < 0.001)。双特异性抗体显著改善了反应持续时间和中位生存期(P < 0.001)。双特异性抗体似乎克服了与早期复发和EMD相关的不良预后,并且在多变量分析中是改善生存率的独立预测因子。总之,这些结果表明双特异性抗体可以作为CAR - t细胞治疗后RRMM复发的标准治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA or GPRC5D are highly effective in relapsed myeloma after CAR T-cell therapy

Bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA or GPRC5D are highly effective in relapsed myeloma after CAR T-cell therapy

Despite the astonishing outcomes after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), most patients eventually relapse. There are only limited data available on salvage therapies following relapse after BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Here, we analyzed outcomes of post-CAR T-cell therapy relapse and impact of different salvage strategies in an international cohort of 139 patients (n = 130 ide-cel, n = 9 cilta-cel), receiving talquetamab (n = 28), teclistamab (n = 37), combinations of immunomodulating drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) or CD38 monoclonal antibodies (n = 43), and others (n = 31). The median time to relapse after CAR T-cell therapy was 5 months, 53% had the extramedullary disease (EMD) at relapse, associated with dismal post-relapse outcome (P = 0.005). Overall response and complete response upon salvage therapies were 79% and 39% for talquetamab, 64% and 32% for teclistamab, 30% and 0% for IMiDs/PIs/CD38, and 26% and 3% for others (P < 0.001). Duration of response, as well as median survival, was significantly improved with bispecific antibodies (P < 0.001, respectively). Bispecific antibodies seemed to overcome the poor prognosis associated with early relapse and EMD, and were independent predictors for improved survival in multivariable analysis. In summary, these results suggest bispecific antibodies as the standard of care for relapse after CAR T-cell therapy for RRMM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信