美国老年病学会立场声明:为没有代表的老年人做出医疗决定。

Joseph D Dixon, Aruna V Josyula, Noelle Marie Javier, Yael Zweig, Mriganka Singh, Luke Kim, Niranjan Thothala, Timothy W Farrell
{"title":"美国老年病学会立场声明:为没有代表的老年人做出医疗决定。","authors":"Joseph D Dixon, Aruna V Josyula, Noelle Marie Javier, Yael Zweig, Mriganka Singh, Luke Kim, Niranjan Thothala, Timothy W Farrell","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper is an official position statement of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and updates the 2017 AGS position statement, Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unbefriended Older Adults. In this updated position statement, the term \"unbefriended\" is replaced by \"unrepresented\" as a term that is more value-neutral, more accurately describes the circumstance in which a person without medical decision-making capacity does not have recognized surrogate representation, and better aligns with increasingly preferred terminology as reflected in recent medical literature. We define unrepresented older adults as those who (1) lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent for a particular medical treatment, (2) have not executed an advance directive that addresses the medical treatment at hand and lack capacity to do so, and (3) lack representation from a surrogate decision-maker (i.e., family, friend, or legally authorized surrogate). Making medical decisions on behalf of unrepresented older adults is exceptionally challenging and, given demographic trends, is likely to become increasingly common in the years ahead. The process of arriving at treatment decisions for this population should follow standards of procedural fairness and include capacity assessment, search for potential surrogates, team-based efforts to determine the patient's values and preferences, and steps to guard against bias. Proactive measures are needed to identify older adults at risk for becoming unrepresented. This position statement also calls for national efforts to reduce state-to-state variability in legal approaches for unrepresented patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American Geriatrics Society position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph D Dixon, Aruna V Josyula, Noelle Marie Javier, Yael Zweig, Mriganka Singh, Luke Kim, Niranjan Thothala, Timothy W Farrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper is an official position statement of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and updates the 2017 AGS position statement, Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unbefriended Older Adults. In this updated position statement, the term \\\"unbefriended\\\" is replaced by \\\"unrepresented\\\" as a term that is more value-neutral, more accurately describes the circumstance in which a person without medical decision-making capacity does not have recognized surrogate representation, and better aligns with increasingly preferred terminology as reflected in recent medical literature. We define unrepresented older adults as those who (1) lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent for a particular medical treatment, (2) have not executed an advance directive that addresses the medical treatment at hand and lack capacity to do so, and (3) lack representation from a surrogate decision-maker (i.e., family, friend, or legally authorized surrogate). Making medical decisions on behalf of unrepresented older adults is exceptionally challenging and, given demographic trends, is likely to become increasingly common in the years ahead. The process of arriving at treatment decisions for this population should follow standards of procedural fairness and include capacity assessment, search for potential surrogates, team-based efforts to determine the patient's values and preferences, and steps to guard against bias. Proactive measures are needed to identify older adults at risk for becoming unrepresented. This position statement also calls for national efforts to reduce state-to-state variability in legal approaches for unrepresented patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是美国老年病学会(AGS)的官方立场声明,更新了2017年AGS立场声明,为没有朋友的老年人做出医疗决定。在这一更新后的立场声明中,“无朋友”一词被“无代表”所取代,这一术语更加中立,更准确地描述了没有医疗决策能力的人没有公认的替代代表的情况,并且更好地与最近医学文献中反映的越来越受欢迎的术语保持一致。我们将无代表老年人定义为(1)缺乏为特定医疗提供知情同意的决策能力,(2)没有执行针对手头医疗的预先指示且缺乏这样做的能力,以及(3)缺乏代理决策者(即家人,朋友或合法授权的代理人)的代表。代表没有代表的老年人做出医疗决定是非常具有挑战性的,考虑到人口趋势,在未来几年可能会变得越来越普遍。为这一人群做出治疗决定的过程应遵循程序公平的标准,包括能力评估、寻找潜在的替代品、以团队为基础的努力来确定患者的价值观和偏好,以及防止偏见的步骤。需要采取积极主动的措施,以确定面临无人代表风险的老年人。这一立场声明还呼吁各国努力减少各州在对无律师代表的患者采取法律途径方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
American Geriatrics Society position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults.

This paper is an official position statement of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and updates the 2017 AGS position statement, Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unbefriended Older Adults. In this updated position statement, the term "unbefriended" is replaced by "unrepresented" as a term that is more value-neutral, more accurately describes the circumstance in which a person without medical decision-making capacity does not have recognized surrogate representation, and better aligns with increasingly preferred terminology as reflected in recent medical literature. We define unrepresented older adults as those who (1) lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent for a particular medical treatment, (2) have not executed an advance directive that addresses the medical treatment at hand and lack capacity to do so, and (3) lack representation from a surrogate decision-maker (i.e., family, friend, or legally authorized surrogate). Making medical decisions on behalf of unrepresented older adults is exceptionally challenging and, given demographic trends, is likely to become increasingly common in the years ahead. The process of arriving at treatment decisions for this population should follow standards of procedural fairness and include capacity assessment, search for potential surrogates, team-based efforts to determine the patient's values and preferences, and steps to guard against bias. Proactive measures are needed to identify older adults at risk for becoming unrepresented. This position statement also calls for national efforts to reduce state-to-state variability in legal approaches for unrepresented patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信