在伦道夫县的初级保健提供者中,利用学术详细干预增加阿片类药物使用障碍的筛查、转诊和治疗。

Jennifer Key Foreman, Mitchell Knisely, Jennifer Layton, Jamison Lord
{"title":"在伦道夫县的初级保健提供者中,利用学术详细干预增加阿片类药物使用障碍的筛查、转诊和治疗。","authors":"Jennifer Key Foreman, Mitchell Knisely, Jennifer Layton, Jamison Lord","doi":"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder is a national epidemic that has killed over one million United States residents since 1999. Randolph County, North Carolina (NC) has a significantly higher rate of drug overdose and emergency-department-related visits than the NC state average. Primary care providers are well positioned to intervene and offer screening, referral, and treatment of opioid use disorder, yet this does not often occur.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement project serves as a pilot to evaluate the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) to increase screening, referral, and treatment of opioid use disorder as well as to increase knowledge of community resources available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Face-to-face one-to-one AD was provided to primary care providers. Content included an overview of the diagnosis, standardized screening tools, management, and community resources available for referral. Assessments pre and post were conducted to evaluate screening, referral and treatment practices, knowledge of available community resources, barriers to providing services, and satisfaction with the AD event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AD did not result in change in frequency of screening or referral for treatment for OUD. None of the providers who participated in the intervention were prescribing buprenorphine prior to the event, nor were they after the event. Results indicated that there was an increase in the knowledge level of providers after AD with a change in median knowledge level from \"I know about some resources in the area\" to \"I am very knowledgeable about area resources.\" Barriers to screening, referral, and treatment were identified, with lack of time being the most frequently cited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AD did not increase screening, referral, or treatment of OUD in this pilot project. However, there was an increase in knowledge of community resources related to OUD. AD is labor and time intensive and may be difficult to scale.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Providers are well positioned to impact patient lives and increase screening, referral, and treatment for OUD in primary care settings. Continued work is needed to overcome barriers for getting patients adequate OUD treatment. Additional research is needed to ascertain if varied forms of AD would be more time and cost effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":94062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addictions nursing","volume":"35 4","pages":"225-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing Academic Detailing Intervention to Increase Screening, Referral, and Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder Among Primary Care Providers in Randolph County.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Key Foreman, Mitchell Knisely, Jennifer Layton, Jamison Lord\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder is a national epidemic that has killed over one million United States residents since 1999. Randolph County, North Carolina (NC) has a significantly higher rate of drug overdose and emergency-department-related visits than the NC state average. Primary care providers are well positioned to intervene and offer screening, referral, and treatment of opioid use disorder, yet this does not often occur.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement project serves as a pilot to evaluate the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) to increase screening, referral, and treatment of opioid use disorder as well as to increase knowledge of community resources available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Face-to-face one-to-one AD was provided to primary care providers. Content included an overview of the diagnosis, standardized screening tools, management, and community resources available for referral. Assessments pre and post were conducted to evaluate screening, referral and treatment practices, knowledge of available community resources, barriers to providing services, and satisfaction with the AD event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AD did not result in change in frequency of screening or referral for treatment for OUD. None of the providers who participated in the intervention were prescribing buprenorphine prior to the event, nor were they after the event. Results indicated that there was an increase in the knowledge level of providers after AD with a change in median knowledge level from \\\"I know about some resources in the area\\\" to \\\"I am very knowledgeable about area resources.\\\" Barriers to screening, referral, and treatment were identified, with lack of time being the most frequently cited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AD did not increase screening, referral, or treatment of OUD in this pilot project. However, there was an increase in knowledge of community resources related to OUD. AD is labor and time intensive and may be difficult to scale.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Providers are well positioned to impact patient lives and increase screening, referral, and treatment for OUD in primary care settings. Continued work is needed to overcome barriers for getting patients adequate OUD treatment. Additional research is needed to ascertain if varied forms of AD would be more time and cost effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of addictions nursing\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"225-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of addictions nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addictions nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍是一种全国性的流行病,自1999年以来已造成100多万美国居民死亡。伦道夫县,北卡罗来纳州(NC)的药物过量和急诊相关的访问率明显高于北卡罗来纳州的平均水平。初级保健提供者有能力进行干预,并提供筛查、转诊和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍,但这种情况并不经常发生。目的:本质量改进项目作为一个试点,评估学术细节(AD)在增加阿片类药物使用障碍的筛查、转诊和治疗以及增加对社区可用资源的了解方面的有效性。方法:对初级保健提供者进行面对面一对一的广告宣传。内容包括诊断概述、标准化筛查工具、管理和可用于转诊的社区资源。进行了前后评估,以评估筛查、转诊和治疗实践、对现有社区资源的了解、提供服务的障碍以及对AD事件的满意度。结果:AD没有导致OUD筛查频率或转诊治疗频率的改变。参与干预的医务人员在事件发生前和事件发生后都没有开丁丙诺啡的处方。结果表明,AD后服务提供者的知识水平有所提高,知识水平中位数由“我对该地区的一些资源了解”变为“我对该地区的资源非常了解”。筛查,转诊和治疗的障碍被确定,缺乏时间是最常被引用的。结论:在这个试点项目中,AD并没有增加OUD的筛查、转诊或治疗。然而,与OUD相关的社区资源的知识有所增加。AD是劳动和时间密集型的,可能难以扩展。对护理的启示:在初级保健机构中,提供者可以很好地影响患者的生活,增加对OUD的筛查、转诊和治疗。需要继续努力克服障碍,使患者获得充分的OUD治疗。需要进一步的研究来确定各种形式的阿尔茨海默病是否更节省时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing Academic Detailing Intervention to Increase Screening, Referral, and Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder Among Primary Care Providers in Randolph County.

Background: Opioid use disorder is a national epidemic that has killed over one million United States residents since 1999. Randolph County, North Carolina (NC) has a significantly higher rate of drug overdose and emergency-department-related visits than the NC state average. Primary care providers are well positioned to intervene and offer screening, referral, and treatment of opioid use disorder, yet this does not often occur.

Objective: This quality improvement project serves as a pilot to evaluate the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) to increase screening, referral, and treatment of opioid use disorder as well as to increase knowledge of community resources available.

Methods: Face-to-face one-to-one AD was provided to primary care providers. Content included an overview of the diagnosis, standardized screening tools, management, and community resources available for referral. Assessments pre and post were conducted to evaluate screening, referral and treatment practices, knowledge of available community resources, barriers to providing services, and satisfaction with the AD event.

Results: AD did not result in change in frequency of screening or referral for treatment for OUD. None of the providers who participated in the intervention were prescribing buprenorphine prior to the event, nor were they after the event. Results indicated that there was an increase in the knowledge level of providers after AD with a change in median knowledge level from "I know about some resources in the area" to "I am very knowledgeable about area resources." Barriers to screening, referral, and treatment were identified, with lack of time being the most frequently cited.

Conclusions: AD did not increase screening, referral, or treatment of OUD in this pilot project. However, there was an increase in knowledge of community resources related to OUD. AD is labor and time intensive and may be difficult to scale.

Implications for nursing: Providers are well positioned to impact patient lives and increase screening, referral, and treatment for OUD in primary care settings. Continued work is needed to overcome barriers for getting patients adequate OUD treatment. Additional research is needed to ascertain if varied forms of AD would be more time and cost effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信