纯母乳表达的综合综述。

Kimberly Rosenbaum, Barbara McAlister
{"title":"纯母乳表达的综合综述。","authors":"Kimberly Rosenbaum, Barbara McAlister","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A growing number of families are using exclusive breastmilk expression to feed their newborns. They need accurate information and support from their providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this integrative review was to explore the prevalence, characteristics, practices, and outcomes of families who fed exclusively expressed breastmilk to their infants. The electronic databases of CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and article reference lists for articles on expressing human milk for infants were searched. Results were filtered to glean published studies between 2012 and 2022, academic journals, human studies, and English language journals while excluding secondary reviews and expert opinions. Both authors screened records within Covidence systematic review management software. Selected studies were evaluated for quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Most families who exclusively expressed originally planned to directly breastfeed their newborns and only began pumping after encountering problems. The most frequently recurring theme was that advice from health care personnel was inconsistent. Women described a knowledge deficit and received more help with exclusive expression from informal social media groups than their providers. Prevalence of exclusive breastmilk expression is highest in Asian countries and in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. These women had a shorter duration of human milk feeding and higher likelihood of cessation compared with women who both fed expressed milk and directly breastfed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only recently have breastfeeding researchers begun distinguishing the type of milk (human milk or artificial formula) from the feeding method in their publications. This approach allows clinicians to provide better guidance on the outcomes of each feeding method. As clinicians, we can help families by encouraging them and providing consistently accurate information. Solely feeding expressed human milk is a valid option when the lactating person is unable or unwilling to directly breastfeed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Integrative Review of Exclusive Breast Milk Expression.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Rosenbaum, Barbara McAlister\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A growing number of families are using exclusive breastmilk expression to feed their newborns. They need accurate information and support from their providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this integrative review was to explore the prevalence, characteristics, practices, and outcomes of families who fed exclusively expressed breastmilk to their infants. The electronic databases of CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and article reference lists for articles on expressing human milk for infants were searched. Results were filtered to glean published studies between 2012 and 2022, academic journals, human studies, and English language journals while excluding secondary reviews and expert opinions. Both authors screened records within Covidence systematic review management software. Selected studies were evaluated for quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Most families who exclusively expressed originally planned to directly breastfeed their newborns and only began pumping after encountering problems. The most frequently recurring theme was that advice from health care personnel was inconsistent. Women described a knowledge deficit and received more help with exclusive expression from informal social media groups than their providers. Prevalence of exclusive breastmilk expression is highest in Asian countries and in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. These women had a shorter duration of human milk feeding and higher likelihood of cessation compared with women who both fed expressed milk and directly breastfed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only recently have breastfeeding researchers begun distinguishing the type of milk (human milk or artificial formula) from the feeding method in their publications. This approach allows clinicians to provide better guidance on the outcomes of each feeding method. As clinicians, we can help families by encouraging them and providing consistently accurate information. Solely feeding expressed human milk is a valid option when the lactating person is unable or unwilling to directly breastfeed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:越来越多的家庭使用纯母乳喂养新生儿。他们需要从他们的提供者那里得到准确的信息和支持。方法:本综合综述的目的是探讨用纯母乳喂养婴儿的家庭的患病率、特点、做法和结果。检索CINAHL、Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science电子数据库和文章参考书目,检索有关婴儿泌乳的文章。结果经过筛选,收集了2012年至2022年期间发表的研究、学术期刊、人类研究和英语期刊,同时排除了二次评论和专家意见。两位作者都在covid - 19系统审查管理软件中筛选了记录。使用约翰霍普金斯研究证据评估工具评估选定研究的证据质量。结果:本综述纳入了27项研究。大多数纯母乳家庭最初计划直接母乳喂养新生儿,只是在遇到问题后才开始吸奶。最经常出现的主题是卫生保健人员的建议不一致。女性描述了自己的知识不足,并且在非正式社交媒体群体中获得了比她们的提供者更多的独家表达帮助。纯母乳表达的患病率在亚洲国家和新生儿重症监护病房环境中最高。这些女性母乳喂养的持续时间较短,与同时喂养乳汁和直接母乳喂养的女性相比,停止母乳喂养的可能性更高。讨论:直到最近,母乳喂养研究人员才开始在他们的出版物中区分母乳的类型(人乳或人工配方奶)和喂养方法。这种方法允许临床医生对每种喂养方法的结果提供更好的指导。作为临床医生,我们可以通过鼓励他们并始终如一地提供准确的信息来帮助家庭。当哺乳期的人不能或不愿意直接母乳喂养时,单独喂养人乳是一种有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Integrative Review of Exclusive Breast Milk Expression.

Introduction: A growing number of families are using exclusive breastmilk expression to feed their newborns. They need accurate information and support from their providers.

Methods: The purpose of this integrative review was to explore the prevalence, characteristics, practices, and outcomes of families who fed exclusively expressed breastmilk to their infants. The electronic databases of CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and article reference lists for articles on expressing human milk for infants were searched. Results were filtered to glean published studies between 2012 and 2022, academic journals, human studies, and English language journals while excluding secondary reviews and expert opinions. Both authors screened records within Covidence systematic review management software. Selected studies were evaluated for quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.

Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Most families who exclusively expressed originally planned to directly breastfeed their newborns and only began pumping after encountering problems. The most frequently recurring theme was that advice from health care personnel was inconsistent. Women described a knowledge deficit and received more help with exclusive expression from informal social media groups than their providers. Prevalence of exclusive breastmilk expression is highest in Asian countries and in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. These women had a shorter duration of human milk feeding and higher likelihood of cessation compared with women who both fed expressed milk and directly breastfed.

Discussion: Only recently have breastfeeding researchers begun distinguishing the type of milk (human milk or artificial formula) from the feeding method in their publications. This approach allows clinicians to provide better guidance on the outcomes of each feeding method. As clinicians, we can help families by encouraging them and providing consistently accurate information. Solely feeding expressed human milk is a valid option when the lactating person is unable or unwilling to directly breastfeed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信