“你知道,感觉你可以信任他们”:混合方法实施研究,为扩大应对健康差异的COVID-19学校测试项目提供信息。

Susan M Kiene, Amanda P Miller, Doreen Tuhebwe, Diego A Ceballos, Cynthia N Sanchez, Jamie Moody, Lynnette Famania, Richard Vernon Moore, Eyal Oren, Corinne McDaniels-Davidson
{"title":"“你知道,感觉你可以信任他们”:混合方法实施研究,为扩大应对健康差异的COVID-19学校测试项目提供信息。","authors":"Susan M Kiene, Amanda P Miller, Doreen Tuhebwe, Diego A Ceballos, Cynthia N Sanchez, Jamie Moody, Lynnette Famania, Richard Vernon Moore, Eyal Oren, Corinne McDaniels-Davidson","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00669-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health disparities lead to negative COVID-19 outcomes for Hispanic/Latino communities. Rapid antigen testing was an important mitigation tool for protecting schools and their communities as in-person learning resumed. Within the context of a 3-middle-school non-inferiority trial we assessed acceptability and appropriateness of at-home and school-based COVID-19 antigen testing and implementation barriers and facilitators to facilitate district-wide scale up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and acceptability and appropriateness implementation outcomes, we collected post-implementation qualitative (n = 30) and quantitative (n = 454) data in English and Spanish from trial participants, in-depth feedback sessions among program implementers (n = 19) and coded 137 project meeting minutes. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analyzed. We used multivariate linear models to evaluate program acceptability and appropriateness by COVID-19 testing modality and mixed qualitative and quantitative findings for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaire respondents closely matched school demographics (> 80% Hispanic/Latino and 8% Filipino/Asian Pacific Islander). While both testing modalities were rated as highly acceptable and appropriate, at-home testing was consistently favorable. Qualitative findings provided actionable areas for at-home testing program refinement, guiding district-wide scale up including: maintaining a learning climate to accommodate modifications as guidelines changed, needs of the school community, and implementation challenges; ensuring an engaged school leadership and sufficient human resources; improving educational communication about COVID-19 and technology ease of use; and increased time for pre-implementation planning and engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results underscore the value of the CFIR to inform program implementation, particularly programs to reduce disparities during a public health emergency. Results support optimal testing implementation strategies centering the needs and perspectives of Hispanic/Latinos.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"You know, it feels like you can trust them\\\": mixed methods implementation research to inform the scale up of a health disparities-responsive COVID-19 school testing program.\",\"authors\":\"Susan M Kiene, Amanda P Miller, Doreen Tuhebwe, Diego A Ceballos, Cynthia N Sanchez, Jamie Moody, Lynnette Famania, Richard Vernon Moore, Eyal Oren, Corinne McDaniels-Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-024-00669-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health disparities lead to negative COVID-19 outcomes for Hispanic/Latino communities. Rapid antigen testing was an important mitigation tool for protecting schools and their communities as in-person learning resumed. Within the context of a 3-middle-school non-inferiority trial we assessed acceptability and appropriateness of at-home and school-based COVID-19 antigen testing and implementation barriers and facilitators to facilitate district-wide scale up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and acceptability and appropriateness implementation outcomes, we collected post-implementation qualitative (n = 30) and quantitative (n = 454) data in English and Spanish from trial participants, in-depth feedback sessions among program implementers (n = 19) and coded 137 project meeting minutes. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analyzed. We used multivariate linear models to evaluate program acceptability and appropriateness by COVID-19 testing modality and mixed qualitative and quantitative findings for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaire respondents closely matched school demographics (> 80% Hispanic/Latino and 8% Filipino/Asian Pacific Islander). While both testing modalities were rated as highly acceptable and appropriate, at-home testing was consistently favorable. Qualitative findings provided actionable areas for at-home testing program refinement, guiding district-wide scale up including: maintaining a learning climate to accommodate modifications as guidelines changed, needs of the school community, and implementation challenges; ensuring an engaged school leadership and sufficient human resources; improving educational communication about COVID-19 and technology ease of use; and increased time for pre-implementation planning and engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results underscore the value of the CFIR to inform program implementation, particularly programs to reduce disparities during a public health emergency. Results support optimal testing implementation strategies centering the needs and perspectives of Hispanic/Latinos.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613932/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00669-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00669-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康差异导致西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区的COVID-19阴性结果。随着面对面学习的恢复,快速抗原检测是保护学校及其社区的重要缓解工具。在一项3所中学的非劣效性试验的背景下,我们评估了家庭和学校COVID-19抗原检测的可接受性和适当性,以及实施障碍和促进因素,以促进在全区范围内推广。方法:在实施研究综合框架(CFIR)和可接受性和适当性实施结果的指导下,我们收集了来自试验参与者的实施后定性(n = 30)和定量(n = 454)的英语和西班牙语数据,以及项目实施者之间的深度反馈会议(n = 19),并编码了137个项目会议记录。逐字抄本按主题进行分析。我们使用多元线性模型通过COVID-19检测方式和混合定性和定量结果来评估项目的可接受性和适宜性,以进行解释。结果:问卷调查对象与学校人口统计数据密切匹配(约80%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,8%为菲律宾/亚太岛民)。虽然两种测试方式都被认为是高度可接受和适当的,但家庭测试始终是有利的。定性研究结果为改进家庭测试项目提供了可操作的领域,指导整个地区的规模扩大,包括:保持学习氛围,以适应指导方针的变化、学校社区的需求和实施挑战;确保学校领导积极参与,并拥有充足的人力资源;加强关于COVID-19和技术易用性的教育交流;并增加了实施前规划和参与的时间。结论:结果强调了CFIR在规划实施方面的价值,特别是在突发公共卫生事件期间减少差异的规划。结果支持以西班牙裔/拉丁裔的需求和观点为中心的最佳测试实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"You know, it feels like you can trust them": mixed methods implementation research to inform the scale up of a health disparities-responsive COVID-19 school testing program.

Background: Health disparities lead to negative COVID-19 outcomes for Hispanic/Latino communities. Rapid antigen testing was an important mitigation tool for protecting schools and their communities as in-person learning resumed. Within the context of a 3-middle-school non-inferiority trial we assessed acceptability and appropriateness of at-home and school-based COVID-19 antigen testing and implementation barriers and facilitators to facilitate district-wide scale up.

Methods: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and acceptability and appropriateness implementation outcomes, we collected post-implementation qualitative (n = 30) and quantitative (n = 454) data in English and Spanish from trial participants, in-depth feedback sessions among program implementers (n = 19) and coded 137 project meeting minutes. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analyzed. We used multivariate linear models to evaluate program acceptability and appropriateness by COVID-19 testing modality and mixed qualitative and quantitative findings for interpretation.

Results: Questionnaire respondents closely matched school demographics (> 80% Hispanic/Latino and 8% Filipino/Asian Pacific Islander). While both testing modalities were rated as highly acceptable and appropriate, at-home testing was consistently favorable. Qualitative findings provided actionable areas for at-home testing program refinement, guiding district-wide scale up including: maintaining a learning climate to accommodate modifications as guidelines changed, needs of the school community, and implementation challenges; ensuring an engaged school leadership and sufficient human resources; improving educational communication about COVID-19 and technology ease of use; and increased time for pre-implementation planning and engagement.

Conclusions: Results underscore the value of the CFIR to inform program implementation, particularly programs to reduce disparities during a public health emergency. Results support optimal testing implementation strategies centering the needs and perspectives of Hispanic/Latinos.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信