在基因组选择程序中使用孟德尔抽样方差进行选择决策时的实际考虑。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Tobias A M Niehoff, Jan Ten Napel, Mario P L Calus
{"title":"在基因组选择程序中使用孟德尔抽样方差进行选择决策时的实际考虑。","authors":"Tobias A M Niehoff, Jan Ten Napel, Mario P L Calus","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this work was to test the application of selection criteria that consider the genetic variances of future generations. This has not been done previously in numerically large livestock breeding programs based on estimated rather than assumed known marker effects. A generic pure-line pig breeding program was simulated in which 40 males and 400 females were selected every generation. Daily gain was used as an example trait. Three variance-considering criteria as well as different reference population sizes were compared to investigate the effect of differences in genomic prediction accuracy on selection decisions. All variance-considering criteria retained more genetic variance than if selection was based on estimated breeding values (max. 20%). This effect was more pronounced for higher prediction accuracies and criteria assessing the variance more generations ahead. After 20 generations, the criterion with the longest planning horizon combined with the largest reference population resulted in a 2% higher genetic level of boars selected to produce finisher pigs. While the advantage of accounting for future generations diminished with lower accuracy or shorter planning horizons, the variance-considering criteria never performed worse than selection based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) with respect to commercial genetic gain. We are reporting various accuracy metrics to help judge the effectiveness of using one of our tested criteria in real breeding programs. While we did not find large benefits for genetic gain when considering future variances in selection decisions, we also did not find negative side effects, while considerably more genetic variance was maintained. This means that using variance-considering criteria results in either equally good or better performance than truncation selection based on estimated breeding values. Our criteria can be applied to any genomic breeding program as long as phased genotypes, estimated marker effects and a genetic map are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Tobias A M Niehoff, Jan Ten Napel, Mario P L Calus\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbg.12913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this work was to test the application of selection criteria that consider the genetic variances of future generations. This has not been done previously in numerically large livestock breeding programs based on estimated rather than assumed known marker effects. A generic pure-line pig breeding program was simulated in which 40 males and 400 females were selected every generation. Daily gain was used as an example trait. Three variance-considering criteria as well as different reference population sizes were compared to investigate the effect of differences in genomic prediction accuracy on selection decisions. All variance-considering criteria retained more genetic variance than if selection was based on estimated breeding values (max. 20%). This effect was more pronounced for higher prediction accuracies and criteria assessing the variance more generations ahead. After 20 generations, the criterion with the longest planning horizon combined with the largest reference population resulted in a 2% higher genetic level of boars selected to produce finisher pigs. While the advantage of accounting for future generations diminished with lower accuracy or shorter planning horizons, the variance-considering criteria never performed worse than selection based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) with respect to commercial genetic gain. We are reporting various accuracy metrics to help judge the effectiveness of using one of our tested criteria in real breeding programs. While we did not find large benefits for genetic gain when considering future variances in selection decisions, we also did not find negative side effects, while considerably more genetic variance was maintained. This means that using variance-considering criteria results in either equally good or better performance than truncation selection based on estimated breeding values. Our criteria can be applied to any genomic breeding program as long as phased genotypes, estimated marker effects and a genetic map are available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12913\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是测试考虑后代遗传差异的选择标准的应用。这在以前基于估计而不是假设已知标记效应的大规模牲畜育种计划中还没有做到。模拟了一种普通纯系猪育种方案,每代选择40只公猪和400只母猪。以日增重为例。比较了三种考虑方差的标准以及不同的参考种群大小,以研究基因组预测精度的差异对选择决策的影响。与基于估计育种值的选择相比,所有考虑方差的标准保留了更多的遗传方差。20%)。这种影响对于更高的预测准确性和评估更世代方差的标准更为明显。20代后,规划周期最长的标准与最大参考群体相结合,可使选择生产育肥猪的公猪遗传水平提高2%。虽然考虑后代的优势随着准确性降低或规划周期缩短而减弱,但考虑方差的标准在商业遗传增益方面的表现从未比基于基因组估计育种值(GEBV)的选择差。我们正在报告各种准确性指标,以帮助判断在实际育种计划中使用我们测试过的标准之一的有效性。虽然在考虑未来选择决策的差异时,我们没有发现遗传增益的大好处,但我们也没有发现负面的副作用,而相当多的遗传方差被维持。这意味着使用考虑方差的标准与基于估计育种值的截断选择的结果一样好,甚至更好。我们的标准可以应用于任何基因组育种计划,只要阶段性基因型,估计的标记效应和遗传图谱是可用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.

The purpose of this work was to test the application of selection criteria that consider the genetic variances of future generations. This has not been done previously in numerically large livestock breeding programs based on estimated rather than assumed known marker effects. A generic pure-line pig breeding program was simulated in which 40 males and 400 females were selected every generation. Daily gain was used as an example trait. Three variance-considering criteria as well as different reference population sizes were compared to investigate the effect of differences in genomic prediction accuracy on selection decisions. All variance-considering criteria retained more genetic variance than if selection was based on estimated breeding values (max. 20%). This effect was more pronounced for higher prediction accuracies and criteria assessing the variance more generations ahead. After 20 generations, the criterion with the longest planning horizon combined with the largest reference population resulted in a 2% higher genetic level of boars selected to produce finisher pigs. While the advantage of accounting for future generations diminished with lower accuracy or shorter planning horizons, the variance-considering criteria never performed worse than selection based on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) with respect to commercial genetic gain. We are reporting various accuracy metrics to help judge the effectiveness of using one of our tested criteria in real breeding programs. While we did not find large benefits for genetic gain when considering future variances in selection decisions, we also did not find negative side effects, while considerably more genetic variance was maintained. This means that using variance-considering criteria results in either equally good or better performance than truncation selection based on estimated breeding values. Our criteria can be applied to any genomic breeding program as long as phased genotypes, estimated marker effects and a genetic map are available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信