Nikhil T Sebastian, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Vishal Dhere, Ashesh B Jani, Bruce Hershatter, Pretesh R Patel, Jay W Shelton, Sheela Hanasoge, Karen D Godette, Sagar A Patel
{"title":"雄激素剥夺治疗对接受近距离放射治疗的不良中危前列腺癌患者的影响。","authors":"Nikhil T Sebastian, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Vishal Dhere, Ashesh B Jani, Bruce Hershatter, Pretesh R Patel, Jay W Shelton, Sheela Hanasoge, Karen D Godette, Sagar A Patel","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.143130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While the benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been established for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) receiving dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the role of ADT for patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) with or without supplemental EBRT (sEBRT) is less clear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable IR (UIR) PCa. All patients received BT with or without sEBRT, and were stratified by the receipt of 4-6 months of ADT. Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure biochemical progression- free survival (bPFS) between men who did vs. did not receive ADT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards with backward selection was utilized to determine association of concomitant ADT with bPFS accounting for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 201 eligible patients treated between 2002 and 2019, 78 (38.8%) of whom received ADT. Median follow-up was 15 years. On univariable analysis, there was no significant association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.34-2.63, <i>p</i> = 0.92). Only PSA ≥ 10 was significant for association with worse bPFS (HR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.29-9.52, <i>p</i> = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, there was no association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.34-2.78, <i>p</i> = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-course ADT was not associated with improved bPFS in our study among men with UIR PCa treated with BT with or without sEBRT. These findings suggest that dose intensification achieved with BT may alone be sufficient in treating selected patients with UIR disease, but prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"16 4","pages":"268-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving brachytherapy-based dose-escalated radiation therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil T Sebastian, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Vishal Dhere, Ashesh B Jani, Bruce Hershatter, Pretesh R Patel, Jay W Shelton, Sheela Hanasoge, Karen D Godette, Sagar A Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2024.143130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While the benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been established for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) receiving dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the role of ADT for patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) with or without supplemental EBRT (sEBRT) is less clear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable IR (UIR) PCa. All patients received BT with or without sEBRT, and were stratified by the receipt of 4-6 months of ADT. Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure biochemical progression- free survival (bPFS) between men who did vs. did not receive ADT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards with backward selection was utilized to determine association of concomitant ADT with bPFS accounting for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 201 eligible patients treated between 2002 and 2019, 78 (38.8%) of whom received ADT. Median follow-up was 15 years. On univariable analysis, there was no significant association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.34-2.63, <i>p</i> = 0.92). Only PSA ≥ 10 was significant for association with worse bPFS (HR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.29-9.52, <i>p</i> = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, there was no association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.34-2.78, <i>p</i> = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-course ADT was not associated with improved bPFS in our study among men with UIR PCa treated with BT with or without sEBRT. These findings suggest that dose intensification achieved with BT may alone be sufficient in treating selected patients with UIR disease, but prospective studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"268-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.143130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.143130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:虽然短期雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)对接受剂量递增外束放射治疗(EBRT)的中风险(IR)前列腺癌(PCa)患者的益处已经确立,但ADT对接受近距离放射治疗(BT)的患者有或没有补充EBRT (sEBRT)的作用尚不清楚。材料和方法:我们对患有国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)不利IR (UIR) PCa的男性进行了单机构回顾性分析。所有患者均接受了有或没有sEBRT的BT治疗,并根据接受4-6个月的ADT进行分层。Kaplan-Meier方法用于测量接受ADT和未接受ADT的男性之间的无生化进展生存(bPFS)。利用多变量Cox比例风险和反向选择来确定合并ADT与bPFS的关联,考虑混杂变量。结果:我们确定了2002年至2019年期间接受治疗的201例符合条件的患者,其中78例(38.8%)接受了ADT治疗。中位随访时间为15年。单变量分析显示,ADT使用与bPFS无显著相关性(HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.34-2.63, p = 0.92)。只有PSA≥10与bPFS恶化有显著相关性(HR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.29-9.52, p = 0.014)。在多变量分析中,ADT使用与bPFS无相关性(HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.34-2.78, p = 0.96)。结论:在我们的研究中,在接受或不接受sEBRT的BT治疗的UIR PCa患者中,短期ADT与bPFS的改善无关。这些发现表明,单独使用BT实现剂量强化可能足以治疗特定的UIR疾病患者,但需要进行前瞻性研究。
Impact of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving brachytherapy-based dose-escalated radiation therapy.
Purpose: While the benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been established for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) receiving dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the role of ADT for patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) with or without supplemental EBRT (sEBRT) is less clear.
Material and methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable IR (UIR) PCa. All patients received BT with or without sEBRT, and were stratified by the receipt of 4-6 months of ADT. Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure biochemical progression- free survival (bPFS) between men who did vs. did not receive ADT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards with backward selection was utilized to determine association of concomitant ADT with bPFS accounting for confounding variables.
Results: We identified 201 eligible patients treated between 2002 and 2019, 78 (38.8%) of whom received ADT. Median follow-up was 15 years. On univariable analysis, there was no significant association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.34-2.63, p = 0.92). Only PSA ≥ 10 was significant for association with worse bPFS (HR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.29-9.52, p = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, there was no association of ADT use with bPFS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.34-2.78, p = 0.96).
Conclusions: Short-course ADT was not associated with improved bPFS in our study among men with UIR PCa treated with BT with or without sEBRT. These findings suggest that dose intensification achieved with BT may alone be sufficient in treating selected patients with UIR disease, but prospective studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.