Marc Ruel MD, MPH , Michael W.A. Chu MD, Med , Allen Graeve MD , Marc W. Gerdisch MD , Ralph J. Damiano Jr. MD , Robert L. Smith II MD , William Brent Keeling MD , Michael A. Wait MD , Robert C. Hagberg MD , Reed D. Quinn MD , Gulshan K. Sethi MD , Rosario Floridia MD , Christopher J. Barreiro MD , Andrew L. Pruitt MD , Kevin D. Accola MD , Francois Dagenais MD , Alan H. Markowitz MD , Jian Ye MD , Michael E. Sekela MD , Ryan Y. Tsuda MD , John D. Puskas MD
{"title":"一种新型机械二尖瓣假体的中期生存期、临床和血流动力学结果。","authors":"Marc Ruel MD, MPH , Michael W.A. Chu MD, Med , Allen Graeve MD , Marc W. Gerdisch MD , Ralph J. Damiano Jr. MD , Robert L. Smith II MD , William Brent Keeling MD , Michael A. Wait MD , Robert C. Hagberg MD , Reed D. Quinn MD , Gulshan K. Sethi MD , Rosario Floridia MD , Christopher J. Barreiro MD , Andrew L. Pruitt MD , Kevin D. Accola MD , Francois Dagenais MD , Alan H. Markowitz MD , Jian Ye MD , Michael E. Sekela MD , Ryan Y. Tsuda MD , John D. Puskas MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core lab–adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years in the pooled population.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Actuarial survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 95.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% at 5 years, with no significant difference between the Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed a mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) of 4.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg at 1 year, with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area. MG values were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to 5 years postimplantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision making in young patients requiring MVR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"170 4","pages":"Pages 1060-1068.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of a novel mechanical mitral valve prosthesis\",\"authors\":\"Marc Ruel MD, MPH , Michael W.A. Chu MD, Med , Allen Graeve MD , Marc W. Gerdisch MD , Ralph J. Damiano Jr. MD , Robert L. Smith II MD , William Brent Keeling MD , Michael A. Wait MD , Robert C. Hagberg MD , Reed D. Quinn MD , Gulshan K. Sethi MD , Rosario Floridia MD , Christopher J. Barreiro MD , Andrew L. Pruitt MD , Kevin D. Accola MD , Francois Dagenais MD , Alan H. Markowitz MD , Jian Ye MD , Michael E. Sekela MD , Ryan Y. Tsuda MD , John D. Puskas MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core lab–adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years in the pooled population.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Actuarial survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 95.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% at 5 years, with no significant difference between the Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed a mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) of 4.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg at 1 year, with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area. MG values were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to 5 years postimplantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision making in young patients requiring MVR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"170 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1060-1068.e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522324011103\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522324011103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of a novel mechanical mitral valve prosthesis
Objective
To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT).
Method
PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core lab–adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years in the pooled population.
Results
Actuarial survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 95.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% at 5 years, with no significant difference between the Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed a mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) of 4.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg at 1 year, with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area. MG values were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes.
Conclusions
The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to 5 years postimplantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision making in young patients requiring MVR.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.