Elena Orlandi, Chiara Citterio, Rebecca Chinelli, Ilaria Dotti, Elena Zaffignani, Claudia Biasini, Elisa Anselmi, Gabriele Cremona, Stefano Vecchia
{"title":"比较老年晚期胰腺癌联合化疗与单化疗:来自单中心研究的见解","authors":"Elena Orlandi, Chiara Citterio, Rebecca Chinelli, Ilaria Dotti, Elena Zaffignani, Claudia Biasini, Elisa Anselmi, Gabriele Cremona, Stefano Vecchia","doi":"10.1177/10732748241304968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increases with age and is frequently diagnosed at an inoperable stage, which limits treatment options. There is limited evidence concerning patients over 75 years old, and clinical practice often lacks clear guidance regarding the choice of first-line therapy. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to assess overall survival (OS) in elderly patients receiving first-line monochemotherapy vs combination therapy. Secondary objectives included evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the records of 150 patients aged 75 or older with confirmed PDAC treated with first-line chemotherapy at Piacenza General Hospital, Italy. Of these, 72 patients received monotherapy, while 78 underwent polychemotherapy. The majority of patients (93.3%) were administered reduced doses, and within this group, 67.9% had their doses reduced by more than 20%. Most patients (80%) presented with comorbidities, predominantly hypertension and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival was significantly higher in the polychemotherapy group (8.2 months) compared to the monotherapy group (4.7 months), with a <i>P</i>-value of 0.0022. The median PFS was 5.7 months for polychemotherapy and 2.8 months for monotherapy, showing a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis, poor performance status, high CA19.9 levels, and monotherapy were significantly associated with worse OS. Patients treated with polychemotherapy had a 37% lower likelihood of death within the year compared to those treated with monotherapy (HR 0.58, <i>P</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polychemotherapy may provide a survival advantage over monotherapy in the late-elderly population, although considerations for dose adjustments due to comorbidities and polypharmacy are necessary. These findings suggest that, when feasible, polychemotherapy could offer a balance between effectiveness and tolerability, potentially improving outcomes in this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"31 ","pages":"10732748241304968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Combination vs Monochemotherapy in Late-Elderly Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Insights From a Single-Center Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Orlandi, Chiara Citterio, Rebecca Chinelli, Ilaria Dotti, Elena Zaffignani, Claudia Biasini, Elisa Anselmi, Gabriele Cremona, Stefano Vecchia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10732748241304968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increases with age and is frequently diagnosed at an inoperable stage, which limits treatment options. There is limited evidence concerning patients over 75 years old, and clinical practice often lacks clear guidance regarding the choice of first-line therapy. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to assess overall survival (OS) in elderly patients receiving first-line monochemotherapy vs combination therapy. Secondary objectives included evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the records of 150 patients aged 75 or older with confirmed PDAC treated with first-line chemotherapy at Piacenza General Hospital, Italy. Of these, 72 patients received monotherapy, while 78 underwent polychemotherapy. The majority of patients (93.3%) were administered reduced doses, and within this group, 67.9% had their doses reduced by more than 20%. Most patients (80%) presented with comorbidities, predominantly hypertension and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival was significantly higher in the polychemotherapy group (8.2 months) compared to the monotherapy group (4.7 months), with a <i>P</i>-value of 0.0022. The median PFS was 5.7 months for polychemotherapy and 2.8 months for monotherapy, showing a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis, poor performance status, high CA19.9 levels, and monotherapy were significantly associated with worse OS. Patients treated with polychemotherapy had a 37% lower likelihood of death within the year compared to those treated with monotherapy (HR 0.58, <i>P</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Polychemotherapy may provide a survival advantage over monotherapy in the late-elderly population, although considerations for dose adjustments due to comorbidities and polypharmacy are necessary. These findings suggest that, when feasible, polychemotherapy could offer a balance between effectiveness and tolerability, potentially improving outcomes in this age group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Control\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"10732748241304968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241304968\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241304968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的发病率随着年龄的增长而增加,并且经常在不能手术的阶段被诊断出来,这限制了治疗选择。关于75岁以上患者的证据有限,临床实践往往缺乏关于一线治疗选择的明确指导。这项回顾性研究的主要目的是评估接受一线单化疗与联合化疗的老年患者的总生存期(OS)。次要目标包括评估无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。方法:回顾性分析意大利皮亚琴察总医院150例75岁及以上确诊PDAC患者接受一线化疗的记录。其中,72名患者接受了单一化疗,78名患者接受了多重化疗。大多数患者(93.3%)给予减少剂量,在该组中,67.9%的患者剂量减少了20%以上。大多数患者(80%)出现合并症,主要是高血压和糖尿病。结果:多化疗组的中位总生存期(8.2个月)明显高于单药组(4.7个月),p值为0.0022。多药组的中位PFS为5.7个月,单药组为2.8个月,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.004)。在多因素分析中,较差的表现状态、较高的CA19.9水平和单药治疗与较差的OS显著相关。与接受单一化疗的患者相比,接受多种化疗的患者在一年内死亡的可能性降低37% (HR 0.58, P = 0.009)。结论:在中老年人群中,多重化疗可能比单一治疗提供生存优势,尽管由于合并症和多重用药而调整剂量是必要的。这些发现表明,当可行时,多重化疗可以在有效性和耐受性之间提供平衡,可能改善该年龄组的预后。
Comparing Combination vs Monochemotherapy in Late-Elderly Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Insights From a Single-Center Study.
Objectives: The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increases with age and is frequently diagnosed at an inoperable stage, which limits treatment options. There is limited evidence concerning patients over 75 years old, and clinical practice often lacks clear guidance regarding the choice of first-line therapy. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to assess overall survival (OS) in elderly patients receiving first-line monochemotherapy vs combination therapy. Secondary objectives included evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the records of 150 patients aged 75 or older with confirmed PDAC treated with first-line chemotherapy at Piacenza General Hospital, Italy. Of these, 72 patients received monotherapy, while 78 underwent polychemotherapy. The majority of patients (93.3%) were administered reduced doses, and within this group, 67.9% had their doses reduced by more than 20%. Most patients (80%) presented with comorbidities, predominantly hypertension and diabetes.
Results: The median overall survival was significantly higher in the polychemotherapy group (8.2 months) compared to the monotherapy group (4.7 months), with a P-value of 0.0022. The median PFS was 5.7 months for polychemotherapy and 2.8 months for monotherapy, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis, poor performance status, high CA19.9 levels, and monotherapy were significantly associated with worse OS. Patients treated with polychemotherapy had a 37% lower likelihood of death within the year compared to those treated with monotherapy (HR 0.58, P = 0.009).
Conclusion: Polychemotherapy may provide a survival advantage over monotherapy in the late-elderly population, although considerations for dose adjustments due to comorbidities and polypharmacy are necessary. These findings suggest that, when feasible, polychemotherapy could offer a balance between effectiveness and tolerability, potentially improving outcomes in this age group.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.