乳腺癌护理及时性的医疗保健获取因素和差异的潜在类别评估。

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500
Matthew R Dunn, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Sarah C Van Alsten, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Lisa A Carey, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"乳腺癌护理及时性的医疗保健获取因素和差异的潜在类别评估。","authors":"Matthew R Dunn, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Sarah C Van Alsten, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Lisa A Carey, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment lead to worse survival and quality of life. Racial disparities in care timeliness have been reported, but few studies have examined access at multiple points along the care continuum (diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment duration, and genomic testing).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) Phase 3 is a population-based, case-only cohort (n = 2,998, 50% black) of patients with invasive breast cancer diagnoses (2008 to 2013). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to group participants based on patterns of factors within 3 separate domains: socioeconomic status (\"SES\"), \"care barriers,\" and \"care use.\" These classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stages III-IV at diagnosis), delayed treatment initiation (more than 30 days between diagnosis and first treatment), prolonged treatment duration (time between first and last treatment-by treatment modality), and receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing (evaluated among patients with early stage, ER+ (estrogen receptor-positive), HER2- (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative) disease). Associations were evaluated using adjusted linear-risk regression to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Delayed diagnosis models were adjusted for age; delayed and prolonged treatment models were adjusted for age and tumor size, stage, and grade at diagnosis; and OncotypeDx models were adjusted for age and tumor size and grade. Overall, 18% of CBCS participants had late stage/delayed diagnosis, 35% had delayed treatment initiation, 48% had prolonged treatment duration, and 62% were not OncotypeDx tested. Black women had higher prevalence for each outcome. We identified 3 latent classes for SES (\"high SES,\" \"moderate SES,\" and \"low SES\"), 2 classes for care barriers (\"few barriers,\" \"more barriers\"), and 5 classes for care use (\"short travel/high preventive care,\" \"short travel/low preventive care,\" \"medium travel,\" \"variable travel,\" and \"long travel\") in which travel is defined by estimated road driving time. Low SES and more barriers to care were associated with greater frequency of delayed diagnosis (RFDadj = 5.5%, 95% CI [2.4, 8.5]; RFDadj = 6.7%, 95% CI [2.8,10.7], respectively) and prolonged treatment (RFDadj = 9.7%, 95% CI [4.8 to 14.6]; RFDadj = 7.3%, 95% CI [2.4 to 12.2], respectively). Variable travel (short travel to diagnosis but long travel to surgery) was associated with delayed treatment in the entire study population (RFDadj = 10.7%, 95% CI [2.7 to 18.8]) compared to the short travel, high use referent group. Long travel to both diagnosis and surgery was associated with delayed treatment only among black women. The main limitations of this work were inability to make inferences about causal effects of individual variables that formed the latent classes, reliance on self-reported socioeconomic and healthcare history information, and generalizability outside of North Carolina, United States of America.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black patients face more frequent delays throughout the care continuum, likely stemming from different types of access barriers at key junctures. Improving breast cancer care access will require intervention on multiple aspects of SES and healthcare access.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"21 12","pages":"e1004500"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A latent class assessment of healthcare access factors and disparities in breast cancer care timeliness.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R Dunn, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Sarah C Van Alsten, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Lisa A Carey, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment lead to worse survival and quality of life. Racial disparities in care timeliness have been reported, but few studies have examined access at multiple points along the care continuum (diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment duration, and genomic testing).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) Phase 3 is a population-based, case-only cohort (n = 2,998, 50% black) of patients with invasive breast cancer diagnoses (2008 to 2013). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to group participants based on patterns of factors within 3 separate domains: socioeconomic status (\\\"SES\\\"), \\\"care barriers,\\\" and \\\"care use.\\\" These classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stages III-IV at diagnosis), delayed treatment initiation (more than 30 days between diagnosis and first treatment), prolonged treatment duration (time between first and last treatment-by treatment modality), and receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing (evaluated among patients with early stage, ER+ (estrogen receptor-positive), HER2- (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative) disease). Associations were evaluated using adjusted linear-risk regression to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Delayed diagnosis models were adjusted for age; delayed and prolonged treatment models were adjusted for age and tumor size, stage, and grade at diagnosis; and OncotypeDx models were adjusted for age and tumor size and grade. Overall, 18% of CBCS participants had late stage/delayed diagnosis, 35% had delayed treatment initiation, 48% had prolonged treatment duration, and 62% were not OncotypeDx tested. Black women had higher prevalence for each outcome. We identified 3 latent classes for SES (\\\"high SES,\\\" \\\"moderate SES,\\\" and \\\"low SES\\\"), 2 classes for care barriers (\\\"few barriers,\\\" \\\"more barriers\\\"), and 5 classes for care use (\\\"short travel/high preventive care,\\\" \\\"short travel/low preventive care,\\\" \\\"medium travel,\\\" \\\"variable travel,\\\" and \\\"long travel\\\") in which travel is defined by estimated road driving time. Low SES and more barriers to care were associated with greater frequency of delayed diagnosis (RFDadj = 5.5%, 95% CI [2.4, 8.5]; RFDadj = 6.7%, 95% CI [2.8,10.7], respectively) and prolonged treatment (RFDadj = 9.7%, 95% CI [4.8 to 14.6]; RFDadj = 7.3%, 95% CI [2.4 to 12.2], respectively). Variable travel (short travel to diagnosis but long travel to surgery) was associated with delayed treatment in the entire study population (RFDadj = 10.7%, 95% CI [2.7 to 18.8]) compared to the short travel, high use referent group. Long travel to both diagnosis and surgery was associated with delayed treatment only among black women. The main limitations of this work were inability to make inferences about causal effects of individual variables that formed the latent classes, reliance on self-reported socioeconomic and healthcare history information, and generalizability outside of North Carolina, United States of America.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black patients face more frequent delays throughout the care continuum, likely stemming from different types of access barriers at key junctures. Improving breast cancer care access will require intervention on multiple aspects of SES and healthcare access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"volume\":\"21 12\",\"pages\":\"e1004500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004500","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌诊断和治疗的延迟导致生存率和生活质量下降。据报道,在护理及时性方面存在种族差异,但很少有研究调查了在护理连续体的多个点(诊断、治疗开始、治疗持续时间和基因组检测)的可及性。方法和研究结果:卡罗莱纳乳腺癌研究(CBCS) 3期是一项基于人群的、仅限病例的队列研究(n = 2998, 50%为黑人),研究对象为浸润性乳腺癌诊断患者(2008年至2013年)。我们使用潜在类分析(LCA)根据3个不同领域的因素模式对参与者进行分组:社会经济地位(“SES”)、“护理障碍”和“护理使用”。这些类别的评估与延迟诊断(诊断时约为III-IV期)、延迟治疗开始(诊断和首次治疗之间超过30天)、延长治疗持续时间(第一次和最后一次治疗之间的时间)以及接受OncotypeDx基因组检测(在早期、ER+(雌激素受体阳性)、HER2-(人表皮生长因子受体2阴性)疾病患者中进行评估)相关。使用校正线性风险回归评估相关性,以95%置信区间(ci)估计相对频率差(rfd)。延迟诊断模型根据年龄进行调整;延迟和延长治疗模型根据年龄、肿瘤大小、分期和诊断时的分级进行调整;OncotypeDx模型根据年龄、肿瘤大小和分级进行调整。总体而言,18%的CBCS参与者有晚期/延迟诊断,35%延迟治疗开始,48%延长治疗持续时间,62%未检测OncotypeDx。黑人女性在每项指标中都有较高的患病率。我们确定了3个潜在的社会地位等级(“高社会地位”、“中等社会地位”和“低社会地位”),2个护理障碍等级(“很少障碍”、“更多障碍”),5个护理使用等级(“短途旅行/高预防性护理”、“短途旅行/低预防性护理”、“中等旅行”、“可变旅行”和“长途旅行”),其中旅行由估计的道路驾驶时间定义。低社会经济地位和更多的护理障碍与更高的延迟诊断频率相关(RFDadj = 5.5%, 95% CI [2.4, 8.5];RFDadj = 6.7%, 95% CI[2.8,10.7])和延长治疗(RFDadj = 9.7%, 95% CI [4.8 ~ 14.6];RFDadj = 7.3%, 95% CI[2.4 ~ 12.2])。在整个研究人群中,与短途出行、高使用率参照组相比,可变出行(到诊断的出行距离较短,但到手术的出行距离较长)与延迟治疗相关(RFDadj = 10.7%, 95% CI[2.7至18.8])。只有黑人女性需要长途跋涉才能进行诊断和手术,这与延迟治疗有关。这项工作的主要局限性是无法推断形成潜在类别的个体变量的因果关系,依赖于自我报告的社会经济和医疗历史信息,以及在美利坚合众国北卡罗来纳州以外的推广。结论:黑人患者在整个护理过程中面临更频繁的延误,可能源于关键时刻不同类型的准入障碍。改善乳腺癌护理的可及性将需要对社会经济地位和保健可及性的多个方面进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A latent class assessment of healthcare access factors and disparities in breast cancer care timeliness.

Background: Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment lead to worse survival and quality of life. Racial disparities in care timeliness have been reported, but few studies have examined access at multiple points along the care continuum (diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment duration, and genomic testing).

Methods and findings: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) Phase 3 is a population-based, case-only cohort (n = 2,998, 50% black) of patients with invasive breast cancer diagnoses (2008 to 2013). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to group participants based on patterns of factors within 3 separate domains: socioeconomic status ("SES"), "care barriers," and "care use." These classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stages III-IV at diagnosis), delayed treatment initiation (more than 30 days between diagnosis and first treatment), prolonged treatment duration (time between first and last treatment-by treatment modality), and receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing (evaluated among patients with early stage, ER+ (estrogen receptor-positive), HER2- (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative) disease). Associations were evaluated using adjusted linear-risk regression to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Delayed diagnosis models were adjusted for age; delayed and prolonged treatment models were adjusted for age and tumor size, stage, and grade at diagnosis; and OncotypeDx models were adjusted for age and tumor size and grade. Overall, 18% of CBCS participants had late stage/delayed diagnosis, 35% had delayed treatment initiation, 48% had prolonged treatment duration, and 62% were not OncotypeDx tested. Black women had higher prevalence for each outcome. We identified 3 latent classes for SES ("high SES," "moderate SES," and "low SES"), 2 classes for care barriers ("few barriers," "more barriers"), and 5 classes for care use ("short travel/high preventive care," "short travel/low preventive care," "medium travel," "variable travel," and "long travel") in which travel is defined by estimated road driving time. Low SES and more barriers to care were associated with greater frequency of delayed diagnosis (RFDadj = 5.5%, 95% CI [2.4, 8.5]; RFDadj = 6.7%, 95% CI [2.8,10.7], respectively) and prolonged treatment (RFDadj = 9.7%, 95% CI [4.8 to 14.6]; RFDadj = 7.3%, 95% CI [2.4 to 12.2], respectively). Variable travel (short travel to diagnosis but long travel to surgery) was associated with delayed treatment in the entire study population (RFDadj = 10.7%, 95% CI [2.7 to 18.8]) compared to the short travel, high use referent group. Long travel to both diagnosis and surgery was associated with delayed treatment only among black women. The main limitations of this work were inability to make inferences about causal effects of individual variables that formed the latent classes, reliance on self-reported socioeconomic and healthcare history information, and generalizability outside of North Carolina, United States of America.

Conclusions: Black patients face more frequent delays throughout the care continuum, likely stemming from different types of access barriers at key junctures. Improving breast cancer care access will require intervention on multiple aspects of SES and healthcare access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信