慢性脊髓损伤个体的骨小梁评分:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.46292/sci24-00014
Matteo Ponzano, Lindsie Blencowe, Lora M Giangregorio, B Catharine Craven
{"title":"慢性脊髓损伤个体的骨小梁评分:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Matteo Ponzano, Lindsie Blencowe, Lora M Giangregorio, B Catharine Craven","doi":"10.46292/sci24-00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe lumbar spine (LS) trabecular bone score (TBS) values after SCI, and to explore the differences in fractures risk assessment between FRAX® and TBS-adjusted FRAX® in individuals living with chronic SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from an established cohort were acquired using a Hologic Discovery QDR 4500. TBS measurements were performed using the TBS iNsight<sup>TM</sup> software version 2.1.2.0. A Welch's t-test was performed to explore differences in TBS, FRAX®, and TBS-adjusted FRAX® between men and women, between participants ≤49 years and ≥50 years, and between subgroups with and without history of fracture and with complete and incomplete injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 37 scans; the mean TBS was 1.336 ± 0.107. The mean 10-year fracture risk was 8.8% ± 11.4% for major osteoporotic fracture and 4.0% ± 10.8% for hip fracture according to FRAX®, and 6.6% ± 2.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and 2.8% ± 6.7% for hip fractures according to TBS-adjusted FRAX®. The 10-year fracture risk for major osteoporotic fractures was higher in individuals with a prior fragility fracture compared to those without, according to FRAX® (<i>p</i> = .033) and TBS-adjusted FRAX® (<i>p</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over a half of our sample presented a partially degraded bone microarchitecture based on TBS. TBS was not different between people with motor complete and motor incomplete injury or with and without prior fragility fracture. Future studies are needed to define the clinical relevance of TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX® in people with chronic SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"30 4","pages":"14-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trabecular Bone Score in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Ponzano, Lindsie Blencowe, Lora M Giangregorio, B Catharine Craven\",\"doi\":\"10.46292/sci24-00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe lumbar spine (LS) trabecular bone score (TBS) values after SCI, and to explore the differences in fractures risk assessment between FRAX® and TBS-adjusted FRAX® in individuals living with chronic SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from an established cohort were acquired using a Hologic Discovery QDR 4500. TBS measurements were performed using the TBS iNsight<sup>TM</sup> software version 2.1.2.0. A Welch's t-test was performed to explore differences in TBS, FRAX®, and TBS-adjusted FRAX® between men and women, between participants ≤49 years and ≥50 years, and between subgroups with and without history of fracture and with complete and incomplete injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 37 scans; the mean TBS was 1.336 ± 0.107. The mean 10-year fracture risk was 8.8% ± 11.4% for major osteoporotic fracture and 4.0% ± 10.8% for hip fracture according to FRAX®, and 6.6% ± 2.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and 2.8% ± 6.7% for hip fractures according to TBS-adjusted FRAX®. The 10-year fracture risk for major osteoporotic fractures was higher in individuals with a prior fragility fracture compared to those without, according to FRAX® (<i>p</i> = .033) and TBS-adjusted FRAX® (<i>p</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over a half of our sample presented a partially degraded bone microarchitecture based on TBS. TBS was not different between people with motor complete and motor incomplete injury or with and without prior fragility fracture. Future studies are needed to define the clinical relevance of TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX® in people with chronic SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"14-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci24-00014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci24-00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述脊髓损伤后腰椎(LS)骨小梁评分(TBS)值,并探讨FRAX®和经TBS调整的FRAX®在慢性脊髓损伤患者骨折风险评估中的差异。方法:使用Hologic Discovery QDR 4500获得已建立队列的基线双能x线吸收仪(DXA)扫描。TBS测量使用TBS iNsightTM软件版本2.1.2.0进行。采用Welch’st检验探讨TBS、FRAX®和经TBS调整的FRAX®在男性和女性之间、在受试者≤49岁和≥50岁之间、在有和没有骨折史的亚组之间以及在完全性和不完全性损伤亚组之间的差异。结果:我们分析了37个扫描;TBS平均值为1.336±0.107。根据FRAX®,严重骨质疏松性骨折的平均10年骨折风险为8.8%±11.4%,髋部骨折的平均10年骨折风险为4.0%±10.8%;根据tbs校正的FRAX®,严重骨质疏松性骨折的平均10年骨折风险为6.6%±2.8%,髋部骨折的平均10年骨折风险为2.8%±6.7%。根据FRAX®(p = 0.033)和经tbs校正的FRAX®(p = 0.001),有脆性骨折史的个体10年发生重大骨质疏松性骨折的风险高于无脆性骨折史的个体。结论:超过一半的样本呈现基于TBS的部分降解骨微结构。运动完全性损伤和运动不完全性损伤以及有和没有脆性骨折的患者的TBS没有差异。需要进一步的研究来确定TBS和TBS调节的FRAX®在慢性脊髓损伤患者中的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trabecular Bone Score in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objectives: To describe lumbar spine (LS) trabecular bone score (TBS) values after SCI, and to explore the differences in fractures risk assessment between FRAX® and TBS-adjusted FRAX® in individuals living with chronic SCI.

Methods: Baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from an established cohort were acquired using a Hologic Discovery QDR 4500. TBS measurements were performed using the TBS iNsightTM software version 2.1.2.0. A Welch's t-test was performed to explore differences in TBS, FRAX®, and TBS-adjusted FRAX® between men and women, between participants ≤49 years and ≥50 years, and between subgroups with and without history of fracture and with complete and incomplete injury.

Results: We analyzed 37 scans; the mean TBS was 1.336 ± 0.107. The mean 10-year fracture risk was 8.8% ± 11.4% for major osteoporotic fracture and 4.0% ± 10.8% for hip fracture according to FRAX®, and 6.6% ± 2.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and 2.8% ± 6.7% for hip fractures according to TBS-adjusted FRAX®. The 10-year fracture risk for major osteoporotic fractures was higher in individuals with a prior fragility fracture compared to those without, according to FRAX® (p = .033) and TBS-adjusted FRAX® (p = .001).

Conclusion: Over a half of our sample presented a partially degraded bone microarchitecture based on TBS. TBS was not different between people with motor complete and motor incomplete injury or with and without prior fragility fracture. Future studies are needed to define the clinical relevance of TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX® in people with chronic SCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信