外伤性上肢截肢血运重建手术失败的相关因素。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00098
Joonas Pyörny, Ida Neergård Sletten, Jarkko Jokihaara
{"title":"外伤性上肢截肢血运重建手术失败的相关因素。","authors":"Joonas Pyörny, Ida Neergård Sletten, Jarkko Jokihaara","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microsurgical emergency revascularization surgery for traumatic upper-extremity amputations demands high resource use. Injury details and patient characteristics influence the decision of whether to revascularize or revise an amputation involving the upper extremity. Our aim was to study associations between those factors and unsuccessful revascularization to provide information for clinical decision-making regarding amputation injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied all consecutive patients who had undergone an upper-extremity revascularization at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. The primary outcome was the technical success or failure of the operation, which was defined as the survival or non-survival of the amputated tissue. Using logistic regression, we analyzed prognostic factors including age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, injury mechanism (cut, crush, or avulsion), extent of tissue loss before treatment (number of lost joints), and amputation type (total or subtotal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 patients (mean age, 47 years; 14% female; mostly White Caucasian) were included. The proportion of successful revascularizations (survival of all reconstructed tissue) was 76% (214 of 282). An avulsion injury mechanism (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 14.2), crush injury mechanism (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.0]), and total amputation type (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.8) were the prognostic factors that were associated with the highest risk of unsuccessful revascularizations. We found an S-shaped, nonlinear association between patient age and unsuccessful revascularizations and a U-shaped, nonlinear association between the amount of tissue loss before treatment and unsuccessful revascularizations. There was no evidence of an association between unsuccessful revascularizations and patient sex, smoking, or diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injury details were the most significant prognostic factors of an unsuccessful upper-extremity revascularization, while age was the only patient characteristic that was associated with this outcome. In particular, total amputation type and avulsion and crush injury mechanisms yielded a higher risk of unsuccessful revascularization. We recommend considering this information when making decisions regarding the treatment of upper-extremity amputation injuries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11596528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Unsuccessful Revascularization Surgery in Traumatic Upper-Extremity Amputation.\",\"authors\":\"Joonas Pyörny, Ida Neergård Sletten, Jarkko Jokihaara\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microsurgical emergency revascularization surgery for traumatic upper-extremity amputations demands high resource use. Injury details and patient characteristics influence the decision of whether to revascularize or revise an amputation involving the upper extremity. Our aim was to study associations between those factors and unsuccessful revascularization to provide information for clinical decision-making regarding amputation injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied all consecutive patients who had undergone an upper-extremity revascularization at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. The primary outcome was the technical success or failure of the operation, which was defined as the survival or non-survival of the amputated tissue. Using logistic regression, we analyzed prognostic factors including age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, injury mechanism (cut, crush, or avulsion), extent of tissue loss before treatment (number of lost joints), and amputation type (total or subtotal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 patients (mean age, 47 years; 14% female; mostly White Caucasian) were included. The proportion of successful revascularizations (survival of all reconstructed tissue) was 76% (214 of 282). An avulsion injury mechanism (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 14.2), crush injury mechanism (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.0]), and total amputation type (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.8) were the prognostic factors that were associated with the highest risk of unsuccessful revascularizations. We found an S-shaped, nonlinear association between patient age and unsuccessful revascularizations and a U-shaped, nonlinear association between the amount of tissue loss before treatment and unsuccessful revascularizations. There was no evidence of an association between unsuccessful revascularizations and patient sex, smoking, or diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injury details were the most significant prognostic factors of an unsuccessful upper-extremity revascularization, while age was the only patient characteristic that was associated with this outcome. In particular, total amputation type and avulsion and crush injury mechanisms yielded a higher risk of unsuccessful revascularization. We recommend considering this information when making decisions regarding the treatment of upper-extremity amputation injuries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11596528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外伤性上肢截肢的急诊显微外科血运重建术需要很高的资源利用率。损伤细节和患者特征影响到是否需要重建或修复上肢截肢的决定。我们的目的是研究这些因素与不成功的血运重建之间的关系,为截肢损伤的临床决策提供信息。方法:我们研究了2009年至2019年在坦佩雷大学医院接受上肢血运重建术的所有连续患者。主要结果是手术的技术成功或失败,其定义为切除组织的存活或不存活。使用logistic回归,我们分析了预后因素,包括年龄、性别、吸烟状况、糖尿病、损伤机制(割伤、挤压或撕脱)、治疗前组织损失程度(失去的关节数量)和截肢类型(全部或部分)。结果:共282例患者,平均年龄47岁;14%的女性;主要是白种人)。血管重建成功的比例(所有重建组织的存活率)为76%(282例中有214例)。撕脱伤机制(调整优势比[aOR], 5.9;95%可信区间[CI], 2.5 ~ 14.2),挤压损伤机制(aOR, 2.8;95% CI, 1.1 ~ 7.0])和全截肢类型(aOR, 2.9;95% CI, 1.5 ~ 5.8)是与血运重建失败风险最高相关的预后因素。我们发现患者年龄与不成功的血运重建之间呈s形非线性关联,而治疗前组织损失的数量与不成功的血运重建之间呈u形非线性关联。没有证据表明血运重建失败与患者性别、吸烟或糖尿病之间存在关联。结论:损伤细节是上肢血运重建术失败的最重要的预后因素,而年龄是与该结果相关的唯一患者特征。特别是,全截肢类型和撕脱伤和挤压伤机制导致血运重建失败的风险更高。我们建议在决定上肢截肢损伤的治疗时考虑这些信息。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Associated with Unsuccessful Revascularization Surgery in Traumatic Upper-Extremity Amputation.

Background: Microsurgical emergency revascularization surgery for traumatic upper-extremity amputations demands high resource use. Injury details and patient characteristics influence the decision of whether to revascularize or revise an amputation involving the upper extremity. Our aim was to study associations between those factors and unsuccessful revascularization to provide information for clinical decision-making regarding amputation injuries.

Methods: We studied all consecutive patients who had undergone an upper-extremity revascularization at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. The primary outcome was the technical success or failure of the operation, which was defined as the survival or non-survival of the amputated tissue. Using logistic regression, we analyzed prognostic factors including age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, injury mechanism (cut, crush, or avulsion), extent of tissue loss before treatment (number of lost joints), and amputation type (total or subtotal).

Results: A total of 282 patients (mean age, 47 years; 14% female; mostly White Caucasian) were included. The proportion of successful revascularizations (survival of all reconstructed tissue) was 76% (214 of 282). An avulsion injury mechanism (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 14.2), crush injury mechanism (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.0]), and total amputation type (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.8) were the prognostic factors that were associated with the highest risk of unsuccessful revascularizations. We found an S-shaped, nonlinear association between patient age and unsuccessful revascularizations and a U-shaped, nonlinear association between the amount of tissue loss before treatment and unsuccessful revascularizations. There was no evidence of an association between unsuccessful revascularizations and patient sex, smoking, or diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions: Injury details were the most significant prognostic factors of an unsuccessful upper-extremity revascularization, while age was the only patient characteristic that was associated with this outcome. In particular, total amputation type and avulsion and crush injury mechanisms yielded a higher risk of unsuccessful revascularization. We recommend considering this information when making decisions regarding the treatment of upper-extremity amputation injuries.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信