德文正念状态体力活动量表在临床样本中的验证。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jan Wallner, Leona Kind, Carolin Donath, Johannes Kornhuber, Katharina Luttenberger
{"title":"德文正念状态体力活动量表在临床样本中的验证。","authors":"Jan Wallner, Leona Kind, Carolin Donath, Johannes Kornhuber, Katharina Luttenberger","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00815-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness has been studied as a treatment option for a large range of psychological disorders and is associated with a multitude of positive psychological outcomes. There are now several scales for measuring mindfulness as both a trait and a state. As mindfulness potentially plays a critical role in maintaining physical activity habits, the State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity (SMS-PA) was developed to specifically measure mindfulness in a physical activity context. This study aimed to provide validity evidence for a German version of the SMS-PA (henceforth called SMS-PA-G) in a clinical sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from 129 participants in the randomised controlled trial 'New Ways to Cope with Depression'. The sample, which was screened for clinical depression symptoms, completed the SMS-PA-G and several other psychometric scales for capturing state mindfulness, self-efficacy, sense of coherence, anxiety, depression, and physical activity. We conducted reliability and item analyses and ran a confirmatory factor analysis. Also, we assessed construct validity through correlations with the abovementioned scales and through differences in SMS-PA scores between physically active and nonactive participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean SMS-PA-G score in our sample was 25.3 with a standard deviation of 8.5. The item and reliability analyses provided satisfactory Cronbach's alpha and discriminatory power values. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that physical activity mindfulness can best be described via a bifactor model, with specific mind and body factors and a general mindfulness factor. We found the expected relationships with the attention subscale of state mindfulness, self-efficacy, and sense of coherence but did not find them with the awareness subscale of state mindfulness, depression, and anxiety. As hypothesised, physically active participants exhibited higher SMS-PA-G values than nonactive participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SMS-PA-G is an internally consistent test instrument that captures respondents' general physical activity mindfulness and their attention to mental and bodily events. Whereas validity evidence was generally supportive of the SMS-PA-G, its relationships with other constructs require further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN, ISRCTN12347878. Registered 28 March 2022, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12347878 .</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"8 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the German version of the state mindfulness scale for physical activity in a clinical sample.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Wallner, Leona Kind, Carolin Donath, Johannes Kornhuber, Katharina Luttenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-024-00815-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness has been studied as a treatment option for a large range of psychological disorders and is associated with a multitude of positive psychological outcomes. There are now several scales for measuring mindfulness as both a trait and a state. As mindfulness potentially plays a critical role in maintaining physical activity habits, the State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity (SMS-PA) was developed to specifically measure mindfulness in a physical activity context. This study aimed to provide validity evidence for a German version of the SMS-PA (henceforth called SMS-PA-G) in a clinical sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from 129 participants in the randomised controlled trial 'New Ways to Cope with Depression'. The sample, which was screened for clinical depression symptoms, completed the SMS-PA-G and several other psychometric scales for capturing state mindfulness, self-efficacy, sense of coherence, anxiety, depression, and physical activity. We conducted reliability and item analyses and ran a confirmatory factor analysis. Also, we assessed construct validity through correlations with the abovementioned scales and through differences in SMS-PA scores between physically active and nonactive participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean SMS-PA-G score in our sample was 25.3 with a standard deviation of 8.5. The item and reliability analyses provided satisfactory Cronbach's alpha and discriminatory power values. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that physical activity mindfulness can best be described via a bifactor model, with specific mind and body factors and a general mindfulness factor. We found the expected relationships with the attention subscale of state mindfulness, self-efficacy, and sense of coherence but did not find them with the awareness subscale of state mindfulness, depression, and anxiety. As hypothesised, physically active participants exhibited higher SMS-PA-G values than nonactive participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SMS-PA-G is an internally consistent test instrument that captures respondents' general physical activity mindfulness and their attention to mental and bodily events. Whereas validity evidence was generally supportive of the SMS-PA-G, its relationships with other constructs require further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN, ISRCTN12347878. Registered 28 March 2022, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12347878 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612046/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00815-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00815-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:正念作为一种治疗多种心理障碍的选择已经被研究过,并且与许多积极的心理结果有关。现在有几种测量正念的量表,既可以作为一种特质,也可以作为一种状态。鉴于正念在保持体育活动习惯中可能起着关键作用,我们开发了体育活动状态正念量表(SMS-PA)来专门测量体育活动背景下的正念。本研究旨在为临床样本的德文版短信- pa(以下简称短信- pa - g)提供效度证据。方法:我们使用来自129名随机对照试验“应对抑郁症的新方法”参与者的基线数据。对临床抑郁症状进行筛选的样本,完成了SMS-PA-G和其他几个心理测量量表,以捕捉状态正念、自我效能感、连贯性、焦虑、抑郁和身体活动。我们进行了信度分析和项目分析,并进行了验证性因子分析。此外,我们通过与上述量表的相关性以及体力活动和非体力活动参与者之间短信- pa评分的差异来评估结构效度。结果:样本的SMS-PA-G平均评分为25.3分,标准差为8.5分。项目分析和信度分析提供了令人满意的Cronbach's alpha值和区别幂值。验证性因素分析表明,体育活动正念可以通过双因素模型来描述,其中包括特定的身心因素和一般的正念因素。我们发现状态正念的注意子量表、自我效能感和连贯感与预期的关系,但与状态正念的意识子量表、抑郁和焦虑没有发现预期的关系。正如假设的那样,身体活跃的参与者比不活跃的参与者表现出更高的SMS-PA-G值。结论:SMS-PA-G是一种内部一致的测试工具,可以捕获被调查者的一般身体活动正念以及他们对精神和身体事件的注意。虽然效度证据普遍支持短信- pa - g,但其与其他构念的关系需要进一步研究。试验注册:ISRCTN, ISRCTN12347878。2022年3月28日注册,网址:https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12347878。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the German version of the state mindfulness scale for physical activity in a clinical sample.

Background: Mindfulness has been studied as a treatment option for a large range of psychological disorders and is associated with a multitude of positive psychological outcomes. There are now several scales for measuring mindfulness as both a trait and a state. As mindfulness potentially plays a critical role in maintaining physical activity habits, the State Mindfulness Scale for Physical Activity (SMS-PA) was developed to specifically measure mindfulness in a physical activity context. This study aimed to provide validity evidence for a German version of the SMS-PA (henceforth called SMS-PA-G) in a clinical sample.

Methods: We used baseline data from 129 participants in the randomised controlled trial 'New Ways to Cope with Depression'. The sample, which was screened for clinical depression symptoms, completed the SMS-PA-G and several other psychometric scales for capturing state mindfulness, self-efficacy, sense of coherence, anxiety, depression, and physical activity. We conducted reliability and item analyses and ran a confirmatory factor analysis. Also, we assessed construct validity through correlations with the abovementioned scales and through differences in SMS-PA scores between physically active and nonactive participants.

Results: The mean SMS-PA-G score in our sample was 25.3 with a standard deviation of 8.5. The item and reliability analyses provided satisfactory Cronbach's alpha and discriminatory power values. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that physical activity mindfulness can best be described via a bifactor model, with specific mind and body factors and a general mindfulness factor. We found the expected relationships with the attention subscale of state mindfulness, self-efficacy, and sense of coherence but did not find them with the awareness subscale of state mindfulness, depression, and anxiety. As hypothesised, physically active participants exhibited higher SMS-PA-G values than nonactive participants.

Conclusions: The SMS-PA-G is an internally consistent test instrument that captures respondents' general physical activity mindfulness and their attention to mental and bodily events. Whereas validity evidence was generally supportive of the SMS-PA-G, its relationships with other constructs require further investigation.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN12347878. Registered 28 March 2022, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12347878 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信