探索驱动上肢装置处方和验证的因素:对专职医疗人员的横断面调查。

Q3 Medicine
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43790
A Galbert, A Buis
{"title":"探索驱动上肢装置处方和验证的因素:对专职医疗人员的横断面调查。","authors":"A Galbert, A Buis","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Actuated devices can be beneficial for individuals with upper limb muscle weakness, offering extra force and grip. Utilising this type of assistive device can facilitate daily activities, thereby enhancing independence and overall quality of life. The development of actuated assistive devices has been growing, and current literature shows promise in their clinical use. However, they are not yet medically recommended by global guidelines and councils. Studies have suggested why assistive devices have barriers to access, but actuated devices have not been a focus in these discussions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To address this issue, a survey was conducted among professionals who prescribe and assess upper limb assistive devices. The survey aimed to gather their opinions and quantify the factors that might contribute to the limited use of actuated devices in the field.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A web-based cross-sectional study was designed using Qualtrics, contained 25 items and was conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The survey was piloted, validated, and ethically approved. Results were statistically analysed, and open questions underwent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>87 Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) contributed to the survey, with a completion rate of 69% (60/87). Survey respondents predominately worked from the USA (72%). The survey revealed that 66% of respondents felt they did not have sufficient access to assistive devices and 58% indicated that outcome measures could be improved. They also noted that actuated devices needed to better meet user-centric needs. Barriers to prescribing these devices included a lack of awareness, experience and standardised prescription methods. In addition, the limited time with patients made decision-making and validation of an actuated device difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AHP's have experience prescribing assistive devices but do not have access, knowledge, or clinical methods to assess the use of actuated devices. Future designs for actuated devices should focus on wearability, comfort, user satisfaction, safety and ease of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"43790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Factors for Prescription and Validation of Actuated Upper Limb Devices: a Cross-sectional Survey of Allied Health Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"A Galbert, A Buis\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Actuated devices can be beneficial for individuals with upper limb muscle weakness, offering extra force and grip. Utilising this type of assistive device can facilitate daily activities, thereby enhancing independence and overall quality of life. The development of actuated assistive devices has been growing, and current literature shows promise in their clinical use. However, they are not yet medically recommended by global guidelines and councils. Studies have suggested why assistive devices have barriers to access, but actuated devices have not been a focus in these discussions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To address this issue, a survey was conducted among professionals who prescribe and assess upper limb assistive devices. The survey aimed to gather their opinions and quantify the factors that might contribute to the limited use of actuated devices in the field.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A web-based cross-sectional study was designed using Qualtrics, contained 25 items and was conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The survey was piloted, validated, and ethically approved. Results were statistically analysed, and open questions underwent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>87 Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) contributed to the survey, with a completion rate of 69% (60/87). Survey respondents predominately worked from the USA (72%). The survey revealed that 66% of respondents felt they did not have sufficient access to assistive devices and 58% indicated that outcome measures could be improved. They also noted that actuated devices needed to better meet user-centric needs. Barriers to prescribing these devices included a lack of awareness, experience and standardised prescription methods. In addition, the limited time with patients made decision-making and validation of an actuated device difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AHP's have experience prescribing assistive devices but do not have access, knowledge, or clinical methods to assess the use of actuated devices. Future designs for actuated devices should focus on wearability, comfort, user satisfaction, safety and ease of use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"43790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:致动装置对上肢肌肉无力的个体是有益的,可以提供额外的力量和抓地力。使用这类辅助装置可以方便日常活动,从而提高独立性和整体生活质量。驱动辅助装置的发展一直在增长,目前的文献显示其临床应用前景。然而,全球准则和理事会尚未在医学上推荐它们。研究表明为什么辅助设备有访问障碍,但驱动设备并没有成为这些讨论的焦点。目的:为了解决这一问题,一项调查进行了专业人员谁开和评估上肢辅助装置。该调查旨在收集他们的意见,并量化可能导致驱动装置在该领域使用受限的因素。方法:采用Qualtrics设计了一项基于网络的横断面研究,包含25个项目,于2023年10月至2024年1月进行。该调查经过了试点、验证和伦理批准。对结果进行统计分析,并对开放性问题进行专题分析。调查结果:87名专职医疗人员(ahp)参与了调查,完成率为69%(60/87)。调查对象主要来自美国(72%)。调查显示,66%的受访者认为他们没有足够的辅助设备,58%的受访者表示可以改进结果测量。他们还指出,驱动设备需要更好地满足以用户为中心的需求。使用这些器械的障碍包括缺乏认识、经验和标准化的处方方法。此外,与患者在一起的时间有限,使得驱动装置的决策和验证变得困难。结论:AHP有处方辅助装置的经验,但没有访问、知识或临床方法来评估驱动装置的使用。驱动装置的未来设计应关注可穿戴性、舒适性、用户满意度、安全性和易用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Factors for Prescription and Validation of Actuated Upper Limb Devices: a Cross-sectional Survey of Allied Health Professionals.

Background: Actuated devices can be beneficial for individuals with upper limb muscle weakness, offering extra force and grip. Utilising this type of assistive device can facilitate daily activities, thereby enhancing independence and overall quality of life. The development of actuated assistive devices has been growing, and current literature shows promise in their clinical use. However, they are not yet medically recommended by global guidelines and councils. Studies have suggested why assistive devices have barriers to access, but actuated devices have not been a focus in these discussions.

Objectives: To address this issue, a survey was conducted among professionals who prescribe and assess upper limb assistive devices. The survey aimed to gather their opinions and quantify the factors that might contribute to the limited use of actuated devices in the field.

Methodology: A web-based cross-sectional study was designed using Qualtrics, contained 25 items and was conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The survey was piloted, validated, and ethically approved. Results were statistically analysed, and open questions underwent thematic analysis.

Findings: 87 Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) contributed to the survey, with a completion rate of 69% (60/87). Survey respondents predominately worked from the USA (72%). The survey revealed that 66% of respondents felt they did not have sufficient access to assistive devices and 58% indicated that outcome measures could be improved. They also noted that actuated devices needed to better meet user-centric needs. Barriers to prescribing these devices included a lack of awareness, experience and standardised prescription methods. In addition, the limited time with patients made decision-making and validation of an actuated device difficult.

Conclusion: AHP's have experience prescribing assistive devices but do not have access, knowledge, or clinical methods to assess the use of actuated devices. Future designs for actuated devices should focus on wearability, comfort, user satisfaction, safety and ease of use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信