Rebecca Grace, Savannah Cotter, Lauren Taylor, Di Miao, Sabeena Rahman, Bani M Ratan
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对妊娠意向的次要影响","authors":"Rebecca Grace, Savannah Cotter, Lauren Taylor, Di Miao, Sabeena Rahman, Bani M Ratan","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had many downstream effects, including, for some women, altering the wish to become pregnant. This study examines the effects on pregnancy intention and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score at the initiation of prenatal care in a low-income population during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of cohorts of women initiating prenatal care at two large Medicaid clinics between May and November 2019 and May and November 2020 was performed. Women entering prenatal care before 20 weeks and carrying pregnancies to term were included. Charts were abstracted for pregnancy intention, demographics, medical history, and EPDS score. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to analyze pregnancy intention pre- and pandemic. EPDS scores were compared by unpaired <i>t</i> test in the unplanned pregnancies pre- and pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 462 women in the prepandemic cohort and 477 patients in the COVID pandemic cohort. During the pandemic, 53.04% (253/477) of women reported unplanned pregnancies, a significant increase from a baseline of 42.86% (198/462) of pregnancies prepandemic (<i>P</i> < 0.01, odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.20) when controlling for all other factors. Analysis of unplanned pregnancies specifically showed no significant differences in the demographic makeup pre- and pandemic. There also was no significant change in EPDS scores in unplanned pregnancies between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant increase in the number of unplanned pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large Medicaid patient population, although the demographics of those having unplanned pregnancies and the average EPDS score did not change significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 12","pages":"686-689"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnancy Intention.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Grace, Savannah Cotter, Lauren Taylor, Di Miao, Sabeena Rahman, Bani M Ratan\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had many downstream effects, including, for some women, altering the wish to become pregnant. This study examines the effects on pregnancy intention and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score at the initiation of prenatal care in a low-income population during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of cohorts of women initiating prenatal care at two large Medicaid clinics between May and November 2019 and May and November 2020 was performed. Women entering prenatal care before 20 weeks and carrying pregnancies to term were included. Charts were abstracted for pregnancy intention, demographics, medical history, and EPDS score. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to analyze pregnancy intention pre- and pandemic. EPDS scores were compared by unpaired <i>t</i> test in the unplanned pregnancies pre- and pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 462 women in the prepandemic cohort and 477 patients in the COVID pandemic cohort. During the pandemic, 53.04% (253/477) of women reported unplanned pregnancies, a significant increase from a baseline of 42.86% (198/462) of pregnancies prepandemic (<i>P</i> < 0.01, odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.20) when controlling for all other factors. Analysis of unplanned pregnancies specifically showed no significant differences in the demographic makeup pre- and pandemic. There also was no significant change in EPDS scores in unplanned pregnancies between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant increase in the number of unplanned pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large Medicaid patient population, although the demographics of those having unplanned pregnancies and the average EPDS score did not change significantly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 12\",\"pages\":\"686-689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Secondary Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnancy Intention.
Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had many downstream effects, including, for some women, altering the wish to become pregnant. This study examines the effects on pregnancy intention and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score at the initiation of prenatal care in a low-income population during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: A retrospective review of cohorts of women initiating prenatal care at two large Medicaid clinics between May and November 2019 and May and November 2020 was performed. Women entering prenatal care before 20 weeks and carrying pregnancies to term were included. Charts were abstracted for pregnancy intention, demographics, medical history, and EPDS score. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to analyze pregnancy intention pre- and pandemic. EPDS scores were compared by unpaired t test in the unplanned pregnancies pre- and pandemic.
Results: There were 462 women in the prepandemic cohort and 477 patients in the COVID pandemic cohort. During the pandemic, 53.04% (253/477) of women reported unplanned pregnancies, a significant increase from a baseline of 42.86% (198/462) of pregnancies prepandemic (P < 0.01, odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.20) when controlling for all other factors. Analysis of unplanned pregnancies specifically showed no significant differences in the demographic makeup pre- and pandemic. There also was no significant change in EPDS scores in unplanned pregnancies between the two cohorts.
Conclusions: There was a significant increase in the number of unplanned pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large Medicaid patient population, although the demographics of those having unplanned pregnancies and the average EPDS score did not change significantly.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.