中重度缺血性二尖瓣反流不同手术入路的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2511425
Zhili Wei, Shuai Dong, Xuhua Li, Yang Chen, Shidong Liu, Bing Song
{"title":"中重度缺血性二尖瓣反流不同手术入路的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Zhili Wei, Shuai Dong, Xuhua Li, Yang Chen, Shidong Liu, Bing Song","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2511425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to systematically review the efficacy of various surgical approaches in the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using computerized databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. In our network meta-analysis, we utilized the Cochrane Handbook tool for quality evaluation, while a consistency model and the odds ratio (OR) were used to compile and analyze the data from the studies included, employing Stata 17.0 software for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review included a total of 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which collectively involved 3111 patients and evaluated six different surgical techniques. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that mitral valve repair (MVr) exhibited a significant reduction in 30-day all-cause mortality rates when compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve replacement (MVR), CABG combined with MVR, and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip. Furthermore, probability ranking analysis suggested that MVr may be the most effective approach in reducing 30-day all-cause mortality, while CABG combined with MVr had significantly fewer renal complications compared to CABG combined with MVR. Probability rankings also indicated that CABG+MVr may be the most effective technique in minimizing renal complications. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in other outcome measures among the different surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current limited evidence indicates that CABG combined with MVr may be the best surgical approach for patients with IMR. However, these conclusions are tentative and require further confirmation from more additional high-quality studies.</p><p><strong>Inplasy registration number: </strong>INPLASY202420049. This study can be accessed at the following detailed address: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-2-0049/, last accessed on February 11, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 11","pages":"425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Various Surgical Approaches for Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhili Wei, Shuai Dong, Xuhua Li, Yang Chen, Shidong Liu, Bing Song\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2511425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to systematically review the efficacy of various surgical approaches in the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using computerized databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. In our network meta-analysis, we utilized the Cochrane Handbook tool for quality evaluation, while a consistency model and the odds ratio (OR) were used to compile and analyze the data from the studies included, employing Stata 17.0 software for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review included a total of 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which collectively involved 3111 patients and evaluated six different surgical techniques. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that mitral valve repair (MVr) exhibited a significant reduction in 30-day all-cause mortality rates when compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve replacement (MVR), CABG combined with MVR, and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip. Furthermore, probability ranking analysis suggested that MVr may be the most effective approach in reducing 30-day all-cause mortality, while CABG combined with MVr had significantly fewer renal complications compared to CABG combined with MVR. Probability rankings also indicated that CABG+MVr may be the most effective technique in minimizing renal complications. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in other outcome measures among the different surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current limited evidence indicates that CABG combined with MVr may be the best surgical approach for patients with IMR. However, these conclusions are tentative and require further confirmation from more additional high-quality studies.</p><p><strong>Inplasy registration number: </strong>INPLASY202420049. This study can be accessed at the following detailed address: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-2-0049/, last accessed on February 11, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607506/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2511425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2511425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在系统回顾各种手术入路治疗缺血性二尖瓣反流(IMR)的疗效。方法:利用截至2024年2月的计算机数据库,包括PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science,进行全面的文献检索。在我们的网络荟萃分析中,我们使用Cochrane手册工具进行质量评价,同时使用一致性模型和比值比(OR)对纳入研究的数据进行汇编和分析,并使用Stata 17.0软件。结果:系统评价共纳入20项随机对照试验(RCTs),共涉及3111例患者,评估了6种不同的手术技术。网络荟萃分析表明,与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、二尖瓣置换术(MVr)、CABG联合MVr以及使用MitraClip的经导管二尖瓣边缘到边缘修复术(TEER)相比,二尖瓣修复术(MVr)在30天内的全因死亡率显著降低。此外,概率排序分析表明,MVr可能是降低30天全因死亡率的最有效方法,而CABG联合MVr的肾脏并发症明显少于CABG联合MVr。概率排序也表明CABG+MVr可能是减少肾脏并发症最有效的技术。然而,在不同手术技术的其他结果测量中,没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。结论:目前有限的证据表明,CABG联合MVr可能是治疗IMR患者的最佳手术方法。然而,这些结论是试探性的,需要更多高质量研究的进一步证实。Inplasy注册号:INPLASY202420049。该研究可以通过以下详细地址访问:https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-2-0049/,最后一次访问是在2024年2月11日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Various Surgical Approaches for Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: This study aims to systematically review the efficacy of various surgical approaches in the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using computerized databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. In our network meta-analysis, we utilized the Cochrane Handbook tool for quality evaluation, while a consistency model and the odds ratio (OR) were used to compile and analyze the data from the studies included, employing Stata 17.0 software for this purpose.

Results: The systematic review included a total of 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which collectively involved 3111 patients and evaluated six different surgical techniques. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that mitral valve repair (MVr) exhibited a significant reduction in 30-day all-cause mortality rates when compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve replacement (MVR), CABG combined with MVR, and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip. Furthermore, probability ranking analysis suggested that MVr may be the most effective approach in reducing 30-day all-cause mortality, while CABG combined with MVr had significantly fewer renal complications compared to CABG combined with MVR. Probability rankings also indicated that CABG+MVr may be the most effective technique in minimizing renal complications. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in other outcome measures among the different surgical techniques.

Conclusions: Current limited evidence indicates that CABG combined with MVr may be the best surgical approach for patients with IMR. However, these conclusions are tentative and require further confirmation from more additional high-quality studies.

Inplasy registration number: INPLASY202420049. This study can be accessed at the following detailed address: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-2-0049/, last accessed on February 11, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信