卵圆孔未闭(PFO):病史、诊断和治疗。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2511422
Aurel Maloku, Ali Hamadanchi, Albrecht Günther, Pawel Aftanski, P Christian Schulze, Sven Möbius-Winkler
{"title":"卵圆孔未闭(PFO):病史、诊断和治疗。","authors":"Aurel Maloku, Ali Hamadanchi, Albrecht Günther, Pawel Aftanski, P Christian Schulze, Sven Möbius-Winkler","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2511422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current guidelines recommend closing a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients who have experienced a cryptogenic or cardioembolic stroke, have a high-risk PFO, and are aged between 16 and 60 years (class A recommendation, level I evidence). In terms of efficacy, in the CLOSE and RESPECT trials, the number needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one stroke recurrence in a five-year term was between 20 and 44. Other trials, such as the REDUCE trial, presented much better data with a NNT of 28 at two years and as low as 18 over a follow-up period of 10 years. Interventional PFO closure is relatively straightforward to learn compared to other cardiology procedures; however, it must be performed meticulously to minimize the risk of post-procedural complications. Usually, a double-disk occlusion device is used, followed by antiplatelet therapy. While the potential benefits of PFO closure for conditions such as migraines are currently being studied, robust trials are still required. Therefore, deciding to close a PFO for reasons other than stroke should be considered on a case-by-case basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 11","pages":"422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): History, Diagnosis, and Management.\",\"authors\":\"Aurel Maloku, Ali Hamadanchi, Albrecht Günther, Pawel Aftanski, P Christian Schulze, Sven Möbius-Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2511422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current guidelines recommend closing a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients who have experienced a cryptogenic or cardioembolic stroke, have a high-risk PFO, and are aged between 16 and 60 years (class A recommendation, level I evidence). In terms of efficacy, in the CLOSE and RESPECT trials, the number needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one stroke recurrence in a five-year term was between 20 and 44. Other trials, such as the REDUCE trial, presented much better data with a NNT of 28 at two years and as low as 18 over a follow-up period of 10 years. Interventional PFO closure is relatively straightforward to learn compared to other cardiology procedures; however, it must be performed meticulously to minimize the risk of post-procedural complications. Usually, a double-disk occlusion device is used, followed by antiplatelet therapy. While the potential benefits of PFO closure for conditions such as migraines are currently being studied, robust trials are still required. Therefore, deciding to close a PFO for reasons other than stroke should be considered on a case-by-case basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2511422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2511422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的指南建议在经历过隐源性或心源性卒中、有高危PFO且年龄在16 - 60岁之间的患者(a类推荐,I级证据)关闭卵圆孔未闭(PFO)。就疗效而言,在CLOSE和RESPECT试验中,5年内预防一次卒中复发所需治疗(NNT)的数量在20到44之间。其他试验,如REDUCE试验,提供了更好的数据,两年的NNT为28,随访10年的NNT低至18。与其他心脏病学手术相比,PFO介入性关闭术相对容易学习;然而,必须一丝不苟地进行,以尽量减少术后并发症的风险。通常,使用双盘闭塞装置,然后进行抗血小板治疗。虽然目前正在研究关闭PFO对偏头痛等疾病的潜在益处,但仍需要进行强有力的试验。因此,决定关闭PFO的原因,除了中风应考虑个案的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): History, Diagnosis, and Management.

Current guidelines recommend closing a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients who have experienced a cryptogenic or cardioembolic stroke, have a high-risk PFO, and are aged between 16 and 60 years (class A recommendation, level I evidence). In terms of efficacy, in the CLOSE and RESPECT trials, the number needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one stroke recurrence in a five-year term was between 20 and 44. Other trials, such as the REDUCE trial, presented much better data with a NNT of 28 at two years and as low as 18 over a follow-up period of 10 years. Interventional PFO closure is relatively straightforward to learn compared to other cardiology procedures; however, it must be performed meticulously to minimize the risk of post-procedural complications. Usually, a double-disk occlusion device is used, followed by antiplatelet therapy. While the potential benefits of PFO closure for conditions such as migraines are currently being studied, robust trials are still required. Therefore, deciding to close a PFO for reasons other than stroke should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信