右结肠切除术案例研究:在经验丰富的机器人结肠直肠实践中过渡到具有新颖3端口技术的Hugo RAS系统。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Tommaso Violante, Matteo Rottoli, Jan Colpaert, Martin Poortmans, Kim Boterbergh, Peter Potvlieghe, Ilia Van Campenhout, Bert Van Den Bossche
{"title":"右结肠切除术案例研究:在经验丰富的机器人结肠直肠实践中过渡到具有新颖3端口技术的Hugo RAS系统。","authors":"Tommaso Violante, Matteo Rottoli, Jan Colpaert, Martin Poortmans, Kim Boterbergh, Peter Potvlieghe, Ilia Van Campenhout, Bert Van Den Bossche","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03559-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancements in robotic technology have revolutionized general surgery, with new platforms and continuous improvements enhancing surgical procedures. Our unit adopted the Da Vinci Si model in 2012 and later the X model for various abdominal surgeries. In early 2023, we integrated the Hugo RAS system by Medtronic into our practice following comprehensive training. This study examines the transition of experienced robotic surgeons from the Da Vinci platform to the Hugo RAS system, focusing on robotic right hemicolectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy using the Da Vinci X and Hugo RAS systems. Outcomes from the latest seven cases with the Da Vinci X system were compared to the initial seven cases with the Hugo RAS system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, ASA score, or BMI. Operative times showed a trend towards being shorter with the Da Vinci X (127 ± 30 min) compared to the Hugo RAS (163 ± 43 min), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Other measures, including blood loss, anastomotic configuration, and length of hospital stay, were similar. Two non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the Hugo RAS group, with no complications in the Da Vinci X group. There were no 30-day readmissions or reoperations in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experienced robotic surgeons can seamlessly transition to the Hugo RAS system for right hemicolectomy, achieving comparable outcomes to the Da Vinci system.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A right colectomy case study: transitioning to the Hugo RAS system with a novel 3-ports technique in experienced robotic colorectal practice.\",\"authors\":\"Tommaso Violante, Matteo Rottoli, Jan Colpaert, Martin Poortmans, Kim Boterbergh, Peter Potvlieghe, Ilia Van Campenhout, Bert Van Den Bossche\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-024-03559-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancements in robotic technology have revolutionized general surgery, with new platforms and continuous improvements enhancing surgical procedures. Our unit adopted the Da Vinci Si model in 2012 and later the X model for various abdominal surgeries. In early 2023, we integrated the Hugo RAS system by Medtronic into our practice following comprehensive training. This study examines the transition of experienced robotic surgeons from the Da Vinci platform to the Hugo RAS system, focusing on robotic right hemicolectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy using the Da Vinci X and Hugo RAS systems. Outcomes from the latest seven cases with the Da Vinci X system were compared to the initial seven cases with the Hugo RAS system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, ASA score, or BMI. Operative times showed a trend towards being shorter with the Da Vinci X (127 ± 30 min) compared to the Hugo RAS (163 ± 43 min), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Other measures, including blood loss, anastomotic configuration, and length of hospital stay, were similar. Two non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the Hugo RAS group, with no complications in the Da Vinci X group. There were no 30-day readmissions or reoperations in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experienced robotic surgeons can seamlessly transition to the Hugo RAS system for right hemicolectomy, achieving comparable outcomes to the Da Vinci system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"409 1\",\"pages\":\"368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03559-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03559-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人技术的进步已经彻底改变了普通外科手术,新的平台和不断的改进增强了手术程序。我单位在2012年采用达芬奇Si模型,后来采用X模型进行各种腹部手术。在全面培训后,我们于2023年初将美敦力的Hugo RAS系统整合到我们的实践中。本研究考察了经验丰富的机器人外科医生从Da Vinci平台到Hugo RAS系统的过渡,重点是机器人右半结肠切除术。方法:我们对连续使用达芬奇X和雨果RAS系统接受机器人右半结肠切除术的成年患者进行回顾性分析。将最新7例使用达芬奇X系统的患者的预后与最初7例使用Hugo RAS系统的患者进行比较。结果:两组的基线特征具有可比性,在年龄、性别、合并症、ASA评分或BMI方面无显著差异。与Hugo RAS(163±43 min)相比,Da Vinci X(127±30 min)的手术时间有缩短的趋势,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.2)。其他指标,包括出血量、吻合口结构和住院时间,也相似。Hugo RAS组出现2例术后非手术并发症,Da Vinci X组无并发症。两组患者均无30天再入院或再手术。结论:经验丰富的机器人外科医生可以无缝过渡到Hugo RAS系统进行右半结肠切除术,取得与达芬奇系统相当的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A right colectomy case study: transitioning to the Hugo RAS system with a novel 3-ports technique in experienced robotic colorectal practice.

Introduction: Advancements in robotic technology have revolutionized general surgery, with new platforms and continuous improvements enhancing surgical procedures. Our unit adopted the Da Vinci Si model in 2012 and later the X model for various abdominal surgeries. In early 2023, we integrated the Hugo RAS system by Medtronic into our practice following comprehensive training. This study examines the transition of experienced robotic surgeons from the Da Vinci platform to the Hugo RAS system, focusing on robotic right hemicolectomy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy using the Da Vinci X and Hugo RAS systems. Outcomes from the latest seven cases with the Da Vinci X system were compared to the initial seven cases with the Hugo RAS system.

Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, ASA score, or BMI. Operative times showed a trend towards being shorter with the Da Vinci X (127 ± 30 min) compared to the Hugo RAS (163 ± 43 min), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Other measures, including blood loss, anastomotic configuration, and length of hospital stay, were similar. Two non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the Hugo RAS group, with no complications in the Da Vinci X group. There were no 30-day readmissions or reoperations in either group.

Conclusion: Experienced robotic surgeons can seamlessly transition to the Hugo RAS system for right hemicolectomy, achieving comparable outcomes to the Da Vinci system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信