{"title":"伊立替康脂质体+ 5-FU/LV vs. S-1治疗吉西他滨难治性转移性胰腺癌的疗效:一项使用治疗加权逆概率的真实世界研究","authors":"Hiroshi Imaoka, Masafumi Ikeda, Satoshi Kobayashi, Akihiro Ohba, Masayuki Ueno, Yuko Suzuki, Hidetaka Tsumura, Nana Kimura, Shinya Kawaguchi, Yasuyuki Kawamoto, Kohei Nakachi, Kunihiro Tsuji, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Reiko Ashida, Naohiro Okano, Kumiko Umemoto, Gou Murohisa, Ayumu Hosokawa, Akinori Asagi, Hiroko Nebiki, Rei Suzuki, Takeshi Terashima, Ryusuke Shibata, Kazuhito Kawata, Toshifumi Doi, Hiroshi Ohyama, Yohei Kitano, Kazuhiko Shioji, Hiroyuki Okuyama, Atsushi Naganuma, Yuji Negoro, Yasunari Sakamoto, Satoshi Shimizu, Chigusa Morizane, Makoto Ueno, Junji Furuse, Hiroaki Nagano","doi":"10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The main objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and those treated with S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatments, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. This study was conducted in 31 institutions participating in Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. To minimize potential biases due to the retrospective design, IPTW analysis was performed with multiple imputation, and imputed IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and combined into pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 463 metastatic PC patients were enrolled in this study (257 in the S-1 monotherapy group and 206 in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group). The median OS was 7.50 months (95% CI 4.18-12.69 months) in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group and 5.72 months (95% CI 2.76-10.79 months) in the S-1 monotherapy group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was associated with a significant OS benefit (pooled IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.779; 95% CI 0.399-0.941; p = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard second-line treatment for PC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"356-367"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV vs. S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Imaoka, Masafumi Ikeda, Satoshi Kobayashi, Akihiro Ohba, Masayuki Ueno, Yuko Suzuki, Hidetaka Tsumura, Nana Kimura, Shinya Kawaguchi, Yasuyuki Kawamoto, Kohei Nakachi, Kunihiro Tsuji, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Reiko Ashida, Naohiro Okano, Kumiko Umemoto, Gou Murohisa, Ayumu Hosokawa, Akinori Asagi, Hiroko Nebiki, Rei Suzuki, Takeshi Terashima, Ryusuke Shibata, Kazuhito Kawata, Toshifumi Doi, Hiroshi Ohyama, Yohei Kitano, Kazuhiko Shioji, Hiroyuki Okuyama, Atsushi Naganuma, Yuji Negoro, Yasunari Sakamoto, Satoshi Shimizu, Chigusa Morizane, Makoto Ueno, Junji Furuse, Hiroaki Nagano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The main objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and those treated with S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatments, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. This study was conducted in 31 institutions participating in Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. To minimize potential biases due to the retrospective design, IPTW analysis was performed with multiple imputation, and imputed IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and combined into pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 463 metastatic PC patients were enrolled in this study (257 in the S-1 monotherapy group and 206 in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group). The median OS was 7.50 months (95% CI 4.18-12.69 months) in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group and 5.72 months (95% CI 2.76-10.79 months) in the S-1 monotherapy group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was associated with a significant OS benefit (pooled IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.779; 95% CI 0.399-0.941; p = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard second-line treatment for PC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"356-367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880175/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:S-1单药疗法以前主要在日本被广泛用作吉西他滨化疗后胰腺癌(PC)的二线治疗。根据NAPOLI-1试验的结果,现在推荐的二线治疗是伊立替康脂质体加氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸(nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV)。然而,目前还没有研究比较nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV治疗与S-1单药治疗。方法:本研究的主要目的是使用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)方法,比较nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV患者和S-1单药治疗作为二线治疗的患者的总生存期(OS)。本研究在31家参与日本肝胆胰肿瘤网络的机构中进行。为了最大限度地减少回顾性设计带来的潜在偏差,IPTW分析采用多重输入,使用Cox比例风险模型估计IPTW校正后的风险比和相应的95%置信区间(ci),并将其合并为汇总估计。结果:本研究共纳入463例转移性PC患者(S-1单药组257例,nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV组206例)。nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV组的中位OS为7.50个月(95% CI 4.18-12.69个月),S-1单药组的中位OS为5.72个月(95% CI 2.76-10.79个月)。在经iptw校正的Cox比例风险模型中,nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV与显著的OS获益相关(经iptw校正的合并风险比为0.779;95% ci 0.399-0.941;p = 0.025)。结论:这些发现支持将nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV作为吉西他滨化疗后PC患者的标准二线治疗。
Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV vs. S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Background: S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.
Methods: The main objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and those treated with S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatments, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. This study was conducted in 31 institutions participating in Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. To minimize potential biases due to the retrospective design, IPTW analysis was performed with multiple imputation, and imputed IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and combined into pooled estimates.
Results: A total of 463 metastatic PC patients were enrolled in this study (257 in the S-1 monotherapy group and 206 in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group). The median OS was 7.50 months (95% CI 4.18-12.69 months) in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group and 5.72 months (95% CI 2.76-10.79 months) in the S-1 monotherapy group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was associated with a significant OS benefit (pooled IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.779; 95% CI 0.399-0.941; p = 0.025).
Conclusion: These findings support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard second-line treatment for PC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.