Abdulrahman Alhajahjeh, Lara K Rotter, Jessica M Stempel, Alyssa A Grimshaw, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Ondrej Blaha, Tariq Kewan, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Rory M Shallis, Lourdes Mendez, Maximilian Stahl, Amer M Zeidan
{"title":"白血病临床试验特征和结果的全球差异:ClinicalTrials.gov数据库的横断面研究","authors":"Abdulrahman Alhajahjeh, Lara K Rotter, Jessica M Stempel, Alyssa A Grimshaw, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Ondrej Blaha, Tariq Kewan, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Rory M Shallis, Lourdes Mendez, Maximilian Stahl, Amer M Zeidan","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most clinical trials are conducted exclusively in high-income countries (HICs), with only a small fraction involving centers from low-middle income countries (LMICs). However, studies evaluating the global distribution of clinical trials in leukemia are limited. Therefore, we sought to assess the present state of leukemia clinical trials that involve centers from LMICs and to compare those with trials conducted exclusively in HICs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify leukemia trials initiated between 2000 and 2020. In this cross-sectional study, the search strategy was developed by a medical librarian using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Data abstraction was independently executed by two reviewers. Trials were defined to be LMIC trials if they included centers from LMICs according to the World Bank Atlas country's income level classification for 2022-2023. Conversely, if a trial included centers from HICs only, the study was classified as a HIC trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,345 leukemia-related clinical trials identified, only 160 (4.8%) included centers from LMICs. Compared with HIC trials, LMIC trials had lower termination rates (12.5% <i>v</i> 27.5%; <i>P</i> < .001) and were more likely randomized (52.5% <i>v</i> 18.2%; <i>P</i> < .001), larger (sample sizes >50 patients: 69.0% <i>v</i> 33.6%; <i>P</i> < .001), multicenter (81.9% <i>v</i> 47.9%; <i>P</i> < .001), and later phase (phase III: 36.2% <i>v</i> 8.98%; <i>P</i> < .001; phase IV: 6.25% <i>v</i> 2.17%; <i>P</i> < .001). There was an increase in the proportion of randomized and diseased-focused clinical trials within the trials that involved LMIC centers between 2000-2005 and 2010-2015 (57.1% <i>v</i> 47.1% and 85.7% <i>v</i> 52.9%; <i>P</i> = .013 and 0.014, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a marked underrepresentation of LMICs in leukemia clinical trials reflecting limited access to novel leukemia therapies in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"10 ","pages":"e2400316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Disparities in the Characteristics and Outcomes of Leukemia Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Study of the ClinicalTrials.gov Database.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahman Alhajahjeh, Lara K Rotter, Jessica M Stempel, Alyssa A Grimshaw, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Ondrej Blaha, Tariq Kewan, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Rory M Shallis, Lourdes Mendez, Maximilian Stahl, Amer M Zeidan\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO-24-00316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most clinical trials are conducted exclusively in high-income countries (HICs), with only a small fraction involving centers from low-middle income countries (LMICs). However, studies evaluating the global distribution of clinical trials in leukemia are limited. Therefore, we sought to assess the present state of leukemia clinical trials that involve centers from LMICs and to compare those with trials conducted exclusively in HICs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify leukemia trials initiated between 2000 and 2020. In this cross-sectional study, the search strategy was developed by a medical librarian using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Data abstraction was independently executed by two reviewers. Trials were defined to be LMIC trials if they included centers from LMICs according to the World Bank Atlas country's income level classification for 2022-2023. Conversely, if a trial included centers from HICs only, the study was classified as a HIC trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,345 leukemia-related clinical trials identified, only 160 (4.8%) included centers from LMICs. Compared with HIC trials, LMIC trials had lower termination rates (12.5% <i>v</i> 27.5%; <i>P</i> < .001) and were more likely randomized (52.5% <i>v</i> 18.2%; <i>P</i> < .001), larger (sample sizes >50 patients: 69.0% <i>v</i> 33.6%; <i>P</i> < .001), multicenter (81.9% <i>v</i> 47.9%; <i>P</i> < .001), and later phase (phase III: 36.2% <i>v</i> 8.98%; <i>P</i> < .001; phase IV: 6.25% <i>v</i> 2.17%; <i>P</i> < .001). There was an increase in the proportion of randomized and diseased-focused clinical trials within the trials that involved LMIC centers between 2000-2005 and 2010-2015 (57.1% <i>v</i> 47.1% and 85.7% <i>v</i> 52.9%; <i>P</i> = .013 and 0.014, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a marked underrepresentation of LMICs in leukemia clinical trials reflecting limited access to novel leukemia therapies in LMICs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"e2400316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:大多数临床试验仅在高收入国家(HICs)进行,只有一小部分涉及中低收入国家(LMICs)的中心。然而,评估白血病临床试验的全球分布的研究是有限的。因此,我们试图评估涉及低收入国家中心的白血病临床试验的现状,并将其与仅在高收入国家进行的试验进行比较。材料和方法:我们检索ClinicalTrials.gov以确定2000年至2020年之间启动的白血病试验。在这个横断面研究中,搜索策略是由一个医学图书管理员使用受控词汇和自由文本术语开发的。数据抽象由两名评审人员独立执行。根据世界银行《地图集》国家2022-2023年收入水平分类,如果试验包括来自中低收入国家的中心,则试验被定义为中低收入国家试验。相反,如果一项试验只包括来自HIC的中心,则该研究被归类为HIC试验。结果:在3345个白血病相关临床试验中,只有160个(4.8%)纳入了低收入国家的研究中心。与HIC试验相比,LMIC试验的终止率较低(12.5% vs 27.5%;P < .001),随机化的可能性更大(52.5% v 18.2%;P < .001),更大(样本量50例:69.0% vs 33.6%;P < 0.001),多中心(81.9% vs 47.9%;P < 0.001),晚期(III期:36.2% v 8.98%;P < .001;第四相:6.25% v 2.17%;P < 0.001)。在2000-2005年和2010-2015年期间,涉及LMIC中心的试验中,随机和以疾病为重点的临床试验的比例有所增加(57.1% vs 47.1%和85.7% vs 52.9%;P = 0.013和0.014)。结论:我们发现低收入国家在白血病临床试验中的代表性明显不足,反映了低收入国家获得新型白血病治疗的机会有限。
Global Disparities in the Characteristics and Outcomes of Leukemia Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Study of the ClinicalTrials.gov Database.
Purpose: Most clinical trials are conducted exclusively in high-income countries (HICs), with only a small fraction involving centers from low-middle income countries (LMICs). However, studies evaluating the global distribution of clinical trials in leukemia are limited. Therefore, we sought to assess the present state of leukemia clinical trials that involve centers from LMICs and to compare those with trials conducted exclusively in HICs.
Materials and methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify leukemia trials initiated between 2000 and 2020. In this cross-sectional study, the search strategy was developed by a medical librarian using controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Data abstraction was independently executed by two reviewers. Trials were defined to be LMIC trials if they included centers from LMICs according to the World Bank Atlas country's income level classification for 2022-2023. Conversely, if a trial included centers from HICs only, the study was classified as a HIC trial.
Results: Of 3,345 leukemia-related clinical trials identified, only 160 (4.8%) included centers from LMICs. Compared with HIC trials, LMIC trials had lower termination rates (12.5% v 27.5%; P < .001) and were more likely randomized (52.5% v 18.2%; P < .001), larger (sample sizes >50 patients: 69.0% v 33.6%; P < .001), multicenter (81.9% v 47.9%; P < .001), and later phase (phase III: 36.2% v 8.98%; P < .001; phase IV: 6.25% v 2.17%; P < .001). There was an increase in the proportion of randomized and diseased-focused clinical trials within the trials that involved LMIC centers between 2000-2005 and 2010-2015 (57.1% v 47.1% and 85.7% v 52.9%; P = .013 and 0.014, respectively).
Conclusion: We found a marked underrepresentation of LMICs in leukemia clinical trials reflecting limited access to novel leukemia therapies in LMICs.