PARP抑制剂Niraparib在BAP1和其他DNA损伤反应通路缺陷肿瘤中的II期试验

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1200/PO-24-00406
Thomas J George, Ji-Hyun Lee, David L DeRemer, Peter J Hosein, Steven Staal, Merry Jennifer Markham, Dennie Jones, Karen C Daily, Jonathan A Chatzkel, Brian H Ramnaraign, Julia L Close, Nkiruka Ezenwajiaku, Martina C Murphy, Carmen J Allegra, Sherise Rogers, Zhongyue Zhang, Derek Li, Gayathri Srinivasan, Montaser Shaheen, Robert Hromas
{"title":"PARP抑制剂Niraparib在BAP1和其他DNA损伤反应通路缺陷肿瘤中的II期试验","authors":"Thomas J George, Ji-Hyun Lee, David L DeRemer, Peter J Hosein, Steven Staal, Merry Jennifer Markham, Dennie Jones, Karen C Daily, Jonathan A Chatzkel, Brian H Ramnaraign, Julia L Close, Nkiruka Ezenwajiaku, Martina C Murphy, Carmen J Allegra, Sherise Rogers, Zhongyue Zhang, Derek Li, Gayathri Srinivasan, Montaser Shaheen, Robert Hromas","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR) regulator with mutations (mBAP1) causing a functional protein loss. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) demonstrate synthetic lethality in mBAP1 preclinical models, independent of underlying BRCA status. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a phase II multicenter trial in which refractory solid tumor patients were assigned to cohort A (histology-specific tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (histology-agnostic tumors with other known non-BRCA-confirmed DDR mutations). All patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From August 2018 through December 2021, 37 patients were enrolled with 31 evaluable for response (cohort A, n = 18; cohort B, n = 13). In cohort A, the best response was one partial response (PR; 6%), eight stable disease (SD; 44%), and nine progressive disease (PD; 50%). This cohort stopped at the first stage following the prespecified Simon's design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 patients (78%) with PR or SD but in only 3/9 (33%) in those with PD. The median PFS in patients with mBAP1 (n = 10) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 9.2) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) for wild-type (n = 8; <i>P</i> = .020). In cohort B, the best response was six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%), with SD in those with <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, <i>PTEN</i>, <i>RAD50</i>, and <i>ARID1A</i> mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Niraparib failed to meet the prespecified efficacy end point for response. However, clinical benefit was suggested in a proportion of patients who had a confirmed mBAP1, supporting further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400406"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase II Trial of the PARP Inhibitor, Niraparib, in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response Pathway-Deficient Neoplasms.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J George, Ji-Hyun Lee, David L DeRemer, Peter J Hosein, Steven Staal, Merry Jennifer Markham, Dennie Jones, Karen C Daily, Jonathan A Chatzkel, Brian H Ramnaraign, Julia L Close, Nkiruka Ezenwajiaku, Martina C Murphy, Carmen J Allegra, Sherise Rogers, Zhongyue Zhang, Derek Li, Gayathri Srinivasan, Montaser Shaheen, Robert Hromas\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-24-00406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR) regulator with mutations (mBAP1) causing a functional protein loss. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) demonstrate synthetic lethality in mBAP1 preclinical models, independent of underlying BRCA status. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a phase II multicenter trial in which refractory solid tumor patients were assigned to cohort A (histology-specific tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (histology-agnostic tumors with other known non-BRCA-confirmed DDR mutations). All patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From August 2018 through December 2021, 37 patients were enrolled with 31 evaluable for response (cohort A, n = 18; cohort B, n = 13). In cohort A, the best response was one partial response (PR; 6%), eight stable disease (SD; 44%), and nine progressive disease (PD; 50%). This cohort stopped at the first stage following the prespecified Simon's design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 patients (78%) with PR or SD but in only 3/9 (33%) in those with PD. The median PFS in patients with mBAP1 (n = 10) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 9.2) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) for wild-type (n = 8; <i>P</i> = .020). In cohort B, the best response was six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%), with SD in those with <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, <i>PTEN</i>, <i>RAD50</i>, and <i>ARID1A</i> mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Niraparib failed to meet the prespecified efficacy end point for response. However, clinical benefit was suggested in a proportion of patients who had a confirmed mBAP1, supporting further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616782/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:brca1相关蛋白1 (BAP1)是细胞周期和DNA损伤反应(DDR)的关键调控因子,突变(mBAP1)导致功能性蛋白丢失。PARP抑制剂(PARPis)在mBAP1临床前模型中显示出合成致死性,与潜在的BRCA状态无关。本研究旨在探讨尼拉帕尼在可能携带mBAP1的晚期肿瘤患者中的临床活性。方法:这是一项II期多中心试验,难治性实体瘤患者被分配到队列a(可能携带mBAP1的组织学特异性肿瘤)或队列B(具有其他已知非brca确认的DDR突变的组织学不确定肿瘤)。所有患者接受尼拉帕尼300毫克口服,每日一次,28天为一个周期。主要终点是客观缓解率,次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期。结果:从2018年8月到2021年12月,纳入了37例患者,其中31例可评估反应(队列A, n = 18;B组,n = 13)。在队列A中,最佳反应是一个部分反应(PR;6%), 8例病情稳定(SD;44%), 9例进展性疾病(PD;50%)。这个队列在第一阶段就停止了,按照预先指定的西蒙的设计。7/9的PR或SD患者(78%)检测到mBAP1,而PD患者只有3/9(33%)检测到mBAP1。mBAP1患者(n = 10)的中位PFS为6.7个月(95% CI, 1.0 - 9.2),而野生型患者(n = 8;P = .020)。在队列B中,最佳反应是6个SD(46%)和7个PD(54%),其中有ATM、CHEK2、PTEN、RAD50和ARID1A突变的患者有SD。结论:尼拉帕尼未达到预定的疗效终点。然而,在一定比例的确诊mBAP1患者中显示了临床获益,支持进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase II Trial of the PARP Inhibitor, Niraparib, in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response Pathway-Deficient Neoplasms.

Purpose: BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR) regulator with mutations (mBAP1) causing a functional protein loss. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) demonstrate synthetic lethality in mBAP1 preclinical models, independent of underlying BRCA status. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.

Methods: This was a phase II multicenter trial in which refractory solid tumor patients were assigned to cohort A (histology-specific tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (histology-agnostic tumors with other known non-BRCA-confirmed DDR mutations). All patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

Results: From August 2018 through December 2021, 37 patients were enrolled with 31 evaluable for response (cohort A, n = 18; cohort B, n = 13). In cohort A, the best response was one partial response (PR; 6%), eight stable disease (SD; 44%), and nine progressive disease (PD; 50%). This cohort stopped at the first stage following the prespecified Simon's design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 patients (78%) with PR or SD but in only 3/9 (33%) in those with PD. The median PFS in patients with mBAP1 (n = 10) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 9.2) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) for wild-type (n = 8; P = .020). In cohort B, the best response was six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%), with SD in those with ATM, CHEK2, PTEN, RAD50, and ARID1A mutations.

Conclusion: Niraparib failed to meet the prespecified efficacy end point for response. However, clinical benefit was suggested in a proportion of patients who had a confirmed mBAP1, supporting further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信