门诊非肠外抗菌素治疗方案抗菌素稳定性检测指南综述:全球统一检测框架的时机到了吗?

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae186
Saiyuri Naicker, Jason A Roberts, Vesa Cheng, Suzanne L Parker, R Andrew Seaton, Mark Gilchrist, Fekade B Sime
{"title":"门诊非肠外抗菌素治疗方案抗菌素稳定性检测指南综述:全球统一检测框架的时机到了吗?","authors":"Saiyuri Naicker, Jason A Roberts, Vesa Cheng, Suzanne L Parker, R Andrew Seaton, Mark Gilchrist, Fekade B Sime","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial stability is an important consideration for treatment planning and service delivery in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programmes. Regulation of stability assessment varies by region, and conflicting guidance and standards exist. This leads to disparity of equity in access and limits availability of certain antimicrobials for managing infections in the outpatient setting. This review discusses the degree to which the international regulatory bodies have reached consensus on the regulation of antimicrobial stability testing, specifically for OPAT, and describes the variation in antimicrobial recommendations across regulatory bodies. The three major findings in this review are (i) variation in antimicrobial stability testing guidance, particularly in relation to temperature; (ii) lack of regulatory guidance, specifically in that some regions did not have OPAT guidelines; and (iii) only the UK's NHS has provided non-regulatory OPAT-specific advice on antimicrobial stability testing. In conclusion, harmonization of antimicrobial stability testing to form a global OPAT-specific regulatory framework, particularly considering 'areas of variation' amongst current guidance, is required. We call for the development of a global OPAT antimicrobial stability testing framework with consensus from accepted antimicrobial stability criteria, expert opinion and pharmacopoeial best practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 6","pages":"dlae186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of antimicrobial stability testing guidance for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programmes: is it time for global harmonization of testing frameworks?\",\"authors\":\"Saiyuri Naicker, Jason A Roberts, Vesa Cheng, Suzanne L Parker, R Andrew Seaton, Mark Gilchrist, Fekade B Sime\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlae186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antimicrobial stability is an important consideration for treatment planning and service delivery in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programmes. Regulation of stability assessment varies by region, and conflicting guidance and standards exist. This leads to disparity of equity in access and limits availability of certain antimicrobials for managing infections in the outpatient setting. This review discusses the degree to which the international regulatory bodies have reached consensus on the regulation of antimicrobial stability testing, specifically for OPAT, and describes the variation in antimicrobial recommendations across regulatory bodies. The three major findings in this review are (i) variation in antimicrobial stability testing guidance, particularly in relation to temperature; (ii) lack of regulatory guidance, specifically in that some regions did not have OPAT guidelines; and (iii) only the UK's NHS has provided non-regulatory OPAT-specific advice on antimicrobial stability testing. In conclusion, harmonization of antimicrobial stability testing to form a global OPAT-specific regulatory framework, particularly considering 'areas of variation' amongst current guidance, is required. We call for the development of a global OPAT antimicrobial stability testing framework with consensus from accepted antimicrobial stability criteria, expert opinion and pharmacopoeial best practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"dlae186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606649/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗菌药物稳定性是门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)规划中治疗计划和服务提供的重要考虑因素。各地区对稳定性评价的规定不尽相同,存在着相互矛盾的指导意见和标准。这导致在获取公平方面的差距,并限制了在门诊环境中用于管理感染的某些抗菌素的可得性。本综述讨论了国际监管机构在抗菌素稳定性测试(特别是OPAT)监管方面达成共识的程度,并描述了各监管机构在抗菌素建议方面的差异。本综述的三个主要发现是:(i)抗菌素稳定性测试指南的变化,特别是与温度有关;缺乏监管指导,特别是有些区域没有OPAT准则;(iii)只有英国的NHS提供了针对opat的非监管性抗菌稳定性测试建议。总之,需要统一抗菌素稳定性测试,以形成全球opat特定的监管框架,特别是考虑到当前指南中的“差异领域”。我们呼吁根据公认的抗菌素稳定性标准、专家意见和药典最佳实践达成共识,制定全球OPAT抗菌素稳定性测试框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of antimicrobial stability testing guidance for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programmes: is it time for global harmonization of testing frameworks?

Antimicrobial stability is an important consideration for treatment planning and service delivery in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programmes. Regulation of stability assessment varies by region, and conflicting guidance and standards exist. This leads to disparity of equity in access and limits availability of certain antimicrobials for managing infections in the outpatient setting. This review discusses the degree to which the international regulatory bodies have reached consensus on the regulation of antimicrobial stability testing, specifically for OPAT, and describes the variation in antimicrobial recommendations across regulatory bodies. The three major findings in this review are (i) variation in antimicrobial stability testing guidance, particularly in relation to temperature; (ii) lack of regulatory guidance, specifically in that some regions did not have OPAT guidelines; and (iii) only the UK's NHS has provided non-regulatory OPAT-specific advice on antimicrobial stability testing. In conclusion, harmonization of antimicrobial stability testing to form a global OPAT-specific regulatory framework, particularly considering 'areas of variation' amongst current guidance, is required. We call for the development of a global OPAT antimicrobial stability testing framework with consensus from accepted antimicrobial stability criteria, expert opinion and pharmacopoeial best practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信