《在2019冠状病毒病期间重新评估我们对卫生系统复原力的认识:大流行头两年的经验教训》

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stephanie M Topp
{"title":"《在2019冠状病毒病期间重新评估我们对卫生系统复原力的认识:大流行头两年的经验教训》","authors":"Stephanie M Topp","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of health system resilience has gained prominence in global health discourse, especially in response to the Ebola and COVID-19 pandemics. This commentary responds to Saulnier and colleagues' 2022 review, which used the Dimensions of Resilience Governance framework to synthesize of COVID-19 related health system resilience research and explore possible conceptual gaps. The review's findings reveal elements missing from the original framework which underscore the social nature of health systems. This commentary links the review's empirical findings to nascent theorization of health systems resilience to develop an adapted Framework for Exploratory Research on Health Systems Resilience. A key contribution of the adapted framework is to make explicit the role of actor power and highlight more clearly the distinctions between: (<i>i</i>) research focused on identifying the capacities needed to enable adaptation; (<i>ii</i>) research focused on the actors whose interests and choices determine which adaptive strategies are used, and (<i>iii</i>) research that assess the outcomes of such strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"13 ","pages":"8606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors of Power and Equity: Enhancing Our Health System Resilience Research Frameworks Comment on \\\"Re-evaluating Our Knowledge of Health System Resilience During COVID-19: Lessons From the First Two Years of the Pandemic\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie M Topp\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ijhpm.8606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of health system resilience has gained prominence in global health discourse, especially in response to the Ebola and COVID-19 pandemics. This commentary responds to Saulnier and colleagues' 2022 review, which used the Dimensions of Resilience Governance framework to synthesize of COVID-19 related health system resilience research and explore possible conceptual gaps. The review's findings reveal elements missing from the original framework which underscore the social nature of health systems. This commentary links the review's empirical findings to nascent theorization of health systems resilience to develop an adapted Framework for Exploratory Research on Health Systems Resilience. A key contribution of the adapted framework is to make explicit the role of actor power and highlight more clearly the distinctions between: (<i>i</i>) research focused on identifying the capacities needed to enable adaptation; (<i>ii</i>) research focused on the actors whose interests and choices determine which adaptive strategies are used, and (<i>iii</i>) research that assess the outcomes of such strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"8606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生系统复原力的概念在全球卫生话语中,特别是在应对埃博拉和COVID-19大流行时,已获得突出地位。这篇评论回应了Saulnier及其同事的2022年审查,该审查使用弹性治理框架的维度来综合与COVID-19相关的卫生系统弹性研究并探索可能的概念差距。审查结果揭示了原来框架中缺少的要素,这些要素强调了卫生系统的社会性质。本评论将本综述的实证发现与卫生系统弹性的新兴理论联系起来,以制定一个适用于卫生系统弹性探索性研究的框架。调整后的框架的一个关键贡献是明确行动者力量的作用,并更清楚地强调以下方面的区别:(i)侧重于确定实现适应所需的能力的研究;(ii)关注行为者的利益和选择决定使用何种适应策略的研究;(iii)评估这些策略的结果的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors of Power and Equity: Enhancing Our Health System Resilience Research Frameworks Comment on "Re-evaluating Our Knowledge of Health System Resilience During COVID-19: Lessons From the First Two Years of the Pandemic".

The concept of health system resilience has gained prominence in global health discourse, especially in response to the Ebola and COVID-19 pandemics. This commentary responds to Saulnier and colleagues' 2022 review, which used the Dimensions of Resilience Governance framework to synthesize of COVID-19 related health system resilience research and explore possible conceptual gaps. The review's findings reveal elements missing from the original framework which underscore the social nature of health systems. This commentary links the review's empirical findings to nascent theorization of health systems resilience to develop an adapted Framework for Exploratory Research on Health Systems Resilience. A key contribution of the adapted framework is to make explicit the role of actor power and highlight more clearly the distinctions between: (i) research focused on identifying the capacities needed to enable adaptation; (ii) research focused on the actors whose interests and choices determine which adaptive strategies are used, and (iii) research that assess the outcomes of such strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信