Lidia V Cerron Tito, Juleysi Delgado Baca, Marcos Espinola-Sánchez, Lindsey W Vilca, Salomon Huancahuire-Vega
{"title":"癌症患者的智能健康管理策略、适应和西班牙语SAT-SF问卷的验证","authors":"Lidia V Cerron Tito, Juleysi Delgado Baca, Marcos Espinola-Sánchez, Lindsey W Vilca, Salomon Huancahuire-Vega","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2024.2430967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A sudden cancer diagnosis creates a psycho-emotional and social crisis, making it crucial to manage emotional coping strategies and assess comprehensive health care, addressing both behavioral and practical aspects of patients' daily lives. Although there are instruments that measure strategies for emotional coping, emotional adjustment or post-traumatic growth, we still do not have a questionnaire in Spanish that comprehensively evaluates health self-management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to translate into Spanish and determine the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-SF) evaluation questionnaire in Peruvian patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Cross-sectional study. Translation and back-translation of the SAT-SF were carried out. Next, 271 Peruvian adult patients of both sexes diagnosed with different types of cancer participated in the validation process. The factor structure was studied through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the scale's reliability through Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficients, and the factorial invariance of the scale according to sex. For concurrent validity, the association with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) social support scale was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The original model of three related dimensions presents acceptable fit indices to the data (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 1202.23; df = 402; <i>p</i> < .001; RMSEA = .086 [90% CI .080-.091]; SRMR = .065; CFI = .940; TLI = .930). The scale's factor structure has shown evidence of being strictly invariant for the groups of men and women. The reliability indices according to dimensions were Personal competencies (<i>α</i> = .91; <i>ω</i> = .92), Preparation strategies (<i>α</i> = .87; <i>ω</i> = .86) and Implementation strategies (<i>α</i> = .89; <i>ω</i> = .91). Additionally, it was evidenced that the dimensions of the SAT-SF are significantly related to the dimensions of the Social Support scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SAT-SF questionnaire was adapted to Spanish, demonstrating adequate construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"2430967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligent health management strategies, adaptation, and validation of the SAT-SF questionnaire into Spanish in cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Lidia V Cerron Tito, Juleysi Delgado Baca, Marcos Espinola-Sánchez, Lindsey W Vilca, Salomon Huancahuire-Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21642850.2024.2430967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A sudden cancer diagnosis creates a psycho-emotional and social crisis, making it crucial to manage emotional coping strategies and assess comprehensive health care, addressing both behavioral and practical aspects of patients' daily lives. Although there are instruments that measure strategies for emotional coping, emotional adjustment or post-traumatic growth, we still do not have a questionnaire in Spanish that comprehensively evaluates health self-management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to translate into Spanish and determine the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-SF) evaluation questionnaire in Peruvian patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Cross-sectional study. Translation and back-translation of the SAT-SF were carried out. Next, 271 Peruvian adult patients of both sexes diagnosed with different types of cancer participated in the validation process. The factor structure was studied through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the scale's reliability through Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficients, and the factorial invariance of the scale according to sex. For concurrent validity, the association with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) social support scale was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The original model of three related dimensions presents acceptable fit indices to the data (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 1202.23; df = 402; <i>p</i> < .001; RMSEA = .086 [90% CI .080-.091]; SRMR = .065; CFI = .940; TLI = .930). The scale's factor structure has shown evidence of being strictly invariant for the groups of men and women. The reliability indices according to dimensions were Personal competencies (<i>α</i> = .91; <i>ω</i> = .92), Preparation strategies (<i>α</i> = .87; <i>ω</i> = .86) and Implementation strategies (<i>α</i> = .89; <i>ω</i> = .91). Additionally, it was evidenced that the dimensions of the SAT-SF are significantly related to the dimensions of the Social Support scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SAT-SF questionnaire was adapted to Spanish, demonstrating adequate construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"2430967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2024.2430967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2024.2430967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intelligent health management strategies, adaptation, and validation of the SAT-SF questionnaire into Spanish in cancer patients.
Introduction: A sudden cancer diagnosis creates a psycho-emotional and social crisis, making it crucial to manage emotional coping strategies and assess comprehensive health care, addressing both behavioral and practical aspects of patients' daily lives. Although there are instruments that measure strategies for emotional coping, emotional adjustment or post-traumatic growth, we still do not have a questionnaire in Spanish that comprehensively evaluates health self-management.
Aim: This study aims to translate into Spanish and determine the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-SF) evaluation questionnaire in Peruvian patients with cancer.
Methodology: Cross-sectional study. Translation and back-translation of the SAT-SF were carried out. Next, 271 Peruvian adult patients of both sexes diagnosed with different types of cancer participated in the validation process. The factor structure was studied through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the scale's reliability through Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficients, and the factorial invariance of the scale according to sex. For concurrent validity, the association with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) social support scale was analyzed.
Result: The original model of three related dimensions presents acceptable fit indices to the data (χ2 = 1202.23; df = 402; p < .001; RMSEA = .086 [90% CI .080-.091]; SRMR = .065; CFI = .940; TLI = .930). The scale's factor structure has shown evidence of being strictly invariant for the groups of men and women. The reliability indices according to dimensions were Personal competencies (α = .91; ω = .92), Preparation strategies (α = .87; ω = .86) and Implementation strategies (α = .89; ω = .91). Additionally, it was evidenced that the dimensions of the SAT-SF are significantly related to the dimensions of the Social Support scale.
Conclusion: The SAT-SF questionnaire was adapted to Spanish, demonstrating adequate construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity.
期刊介绍:
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.