Ying Yang, Jieming Zhang, Yuanhui Duan, Lei Zhou, Sisheng Gan, Zongfu Mao, Shaotang Wu, Furong Wang
{"title":"按量采购(VBP)政策下心血管药物消费增加:需求释放还是评估诱导?","authors":"Ying Yang, Jieming Zhang, Yuanhui Duan, Lei Zhou, Sisheng Gan, Zongfu Mao, Shaotang Wu, Furong Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The phenomenon of growth in drug consumption within the framework of national volume-based procurement (VBP) policy raises speculations about demand release and policy inducing. This study aims to explore the reasons and mechanisms of drug consumption increases following VBP policy from two perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from the China Drug Supply Information Platform, National Bureau of Statistics and the Joint Procurement Office. Twenty cardiovascular international non-proprietary names (INNs) in the first three VBP batches and 28 observation regions were included, constructing 418 valid INN-region combinations as the unit for analysis. The average monthly consumption volume of VBP cardiovascular drug was assigned as the explained variable. The generalized difference-in-difference method was conducted using the price reduction level and the size of policy assessment task as the policy intensity indicator. Moderating effect model was employed to examine the role of resident's income level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased cardiovascular drug consumption was observed in 285 (68.18%) INN-region combinations after policy implementation. Under VBP policy, the price reduction level was significantly correlated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.144, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and primary healthcare centers (PHCs) (all p-values < 0.05). Resident's income level negatively moderated the impact of price reduction level on drug consumption in total (β = -0.089, p < 0.001) and in secondary hospitals (β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and PHCs (β = -0.2.9, p < 0.001), rather than in tertiary hospitals (β = -0.079, p > 0.05). The size of policy assessment task was positively associated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.052, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and PHCs (all p-values < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two mechanisms codrive drug consumption increases under VBP policy: first is the improvement of cardiovascular medication access and consumption toward lower-income groups following price reduction, pointing to the fulfillment of unmet needs, and second is policy pressure from supporting assessment measures on hospital drug use, indicating potential overprescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased consumption of cardiovascular drugs under volume-based procurement (VBP) policy: demand release or assessment inducing?\",\"authors\":\"Ying Yang, Jieming Zhang, Yuanhui Duan, Lei Zhou, Sisheng Gan, Zongfu Mao, Shaotang Wu, Furong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The phenomenon of growth in drug consumption within the framework of national volume-based procurement (VBP) policy raises speculations about demand release and policy inducing. This study aims to explore the reasons and mechanisms of drug consumption increases following VBP policy from two perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from the China Drug Supply Information Platform, National Bureau of Statistics and the Joint Procurement Office. Twenty cardiovascular international non-proprietary names (INNs) in the first three VBP batches and 28 observation regions were included, constructing 418 valid INN-region combinations as the unit for analysis. The average monthly consumption volume of VBP cardiovascular drug was assigned as the explained variable. The generalized difference-in-difference method was conducted using the price reduction level and the size of policy assessment task as the policy intensity indicator. Moderating effect model was employed to examine the role of resident's income level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased cardiovascular drug consumption was observed in 285 (68.18%) INN-region combinations after policy implementation. Under VBP policy, the price reduction level was significantly correlated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.144, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and primary healthcare centers (PHCs) (all p-values < 0.05). Resident's income level negatively moderated the impact of price reduction level on drug consumption in total (β = -0.089, p < 0.001) and in secondary hospitals (β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and PHCs (β = -0.2.9, p < 0.001), rather than in tertiary hospitals (β = -0.079, p > 0.05). The size of policy assessment task was positively associated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.052, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and PHCs (all p-values < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two mechanisms codrive drug consumption increases under VBP policy: first is the improvement of cardiovascular medication access and consumption toward lower-income groups following price reduction, pointing to the fulfillment of unmet needs, and second is policy pressure from supporting assessment measures on hospital drug use, indicating potential overprescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在国家按量采购(VBP)政策框架内药物消费增长的现象引发了对需求释放和政策诱导的猜测。本研究旨在从两个角度探讨VBP政策后药物消费增加的原因和机制。方法:从中国药品供应信息平台、国家统计局和联合采购办公室收集数据。纳入前三个VBP批次的20个心血管国际非专利名称(inn)和28个观测区域,构建418个有效的inn区域组合作为分析单元。将VBP心血管药物的月平均用量作为解释变量。采用价格降低水平和政策评估任务规模作为政策强度指标,采用广义差中差法。采用调节效应模型考察了居民收入水平的调节作用。结果:政策实施后,285例(68.18%)inn地区联合用药增加。在VBP政策下,降价幅度与总药品消费量显著相关(β = 0.144, p 0.05)。结论:VBP政策下药品消费增加的共同驱动机制有两种:一是降价后心血管用药可及性和低收入人群用药可及性的改善,表明未满足的需求得到了满足;二是来自医院用药配套评估措施的政策压力,表明可能存在过量处方。
Increased consumption of cardiovascular drugs under volume-based procurement (VBP) policy: demand release or assessment inducing?
Background: The phenomenon of growth in drug consumption within the framework of national volume-based procurement (VBP) policy raises speculations about demand release and policy inducing. This study aims to explore the reasons and mechanisms of drug consumption increases following VBP policy from two perspectives.
Methods: We collected data from the China Drug Supply Information Platform, National Bureau of Statistics and the Joint Procurement Office. Twenty cardiovascular international non-proprietary names (INNs) in the first three VBP batches and 28 observation regions were included, constructing 418 valid INN-region combinations as the unit for analysis. The average monthly consumption volume of VBP cardiovascular drug was assigned as the explained variable. The generalized difference-in-difference method was conducted using the price reduction level and the size of policy assessment task as the policy intensity indicator. Moderating effect model was employed to examine the role of resident's income level.
Results: Increased cardiovascular drug consumption was observed in 285 (68.18%) INN-region combinations after policy implementation. Under VBP policy, the price reduction level was significantly correlated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.144, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and primary healthcare centers (PHCs) (all p-values < 0.05). Resident's income level negatively moderated the impact of price reduction level on drug consumption in total (β = -0.089, p < 0.001) and in secondary hospitals (β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and PHCs (β = -0.2.9, p < 0.001), rather than in tertiary hospitals (β = -0.079, p > 0.05). The size of policy assessment task was positively associated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.052, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and PHCs (all p-values < 0.05).
Conclusions: Two mechanisms codrive drug consumption increases under VBP policy: first is the improvement of cardiovascular medication access and consumption toward lower-income groups following price reduction, pointing to the fulfillment of unmet needs, and second is policy pressure from supporting assessment measures on hospital drug use, indicating potential overprescribing.
期刊介绍:
Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.