基于FAERS数据库的沙比利/缬沙坦与缬沙坦单用与心脏和肾脏不良事件相关的药物警戒信号比较

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2436100
Zhenhui Chen, Jingwen Li, Yan Zhou, Qining Qiu, Dapeng Yan, Gang Peng, Yongpei Xu, Yanrong Ye, Yun Shen
{"title":"基于FAERS数据库的沙比利/缬沙坦与缬沙坦单用与心脏和肾脏不良事件相关的药物警戒信号比较","authors":"Zhenhui Chen, Jingwen Li, Yan Zhou, Qining Qiu, Dapeng Yan, Gang Peng, Yongpei Xu, Yanrong Ye, Yun Shen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2436100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, cardiovascular and renal safety profiles of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with those of valsartan alone, remain controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the pharmacovigilance signals related to cardiovascular and renal adverse events between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Raw report data on cardiac and renal adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone were retrieved from the FAERS database using preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Preferred terms were mapped to System Organ Classes, and the time to onset of adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan occurred within the first month, whereas adverse events were more prevalent 6 months to 1 year after administration of valsartan alone. Adverse events reported for sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone included cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock, and ventricular fibrillation. Considering sacubitril/valsartan only, adverse events reported were renal impairment, renal failure, and acute kidney injury. For valsartan alone, adverse events reported included arrhythmia and angina pectoris.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan carries a higher renal safety risk and lower cardiac safety risk than valsartan alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"445-452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the pharmacovigilance signals of cardiac and renal adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone based on the FAERS database.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenhui Chen, Jingwen Li, Yan Zhou, Qining Qiu, Dapeng Yan, Gang Peng, Yongpei Xu, Yanrong Ye, Yun Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2436100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, cardiovascular and renal safety profiles of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with those of valsartan alone, remain controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the pharmacovigilance signals related to cardiovascular and renal adverse events between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Raw report data on cardiac and renal adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone were retrieved from the FAERS database using preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Preferred terms were mapped to System Organ Classes, and the time to onset of adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan occurred within the first month, whereas adverse events were more prevalent 6 months to 1 year after administration of valsartan alone. Adverse events reported for sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone included cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock, and ventricular fibrillation. Considering sacubitril/valsartan only, adverse events reported were renal impairment, renal failure, and acute kidney injury. For valsartan alone, adverse events reported included arrhythmia and angina pectoris.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan carries a higher renal safety risk and lower cardiac safety risk than valsartan alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"445-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2436100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2436100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床实践中,与缬沙坦单独使用相比,苏比里尔/缬沙坦的心血管和肾脏安全性仍然存在争议。因此,我们的目的是利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,比较苏比里尔/缬沙坦和缬沙坦单独使用与心血管和肾脏不良事件相关的药物警戒信号。研究设计和方法:从FAERS数据库中检索与苏比里尔/缬沙坦和缬沙坦单独相关的心脏和肾脏不良事件的原始报告数据,使用来自医学词典的首选术语进行监管活动。将首选术语映射到系统器官类别,并计算与苏比里尔/缬沙坦和缬沙坦单独相关的不良事件发生的时间。结果:大多数与沙比里尔/缬沙坦相关的不良事件发生在第一个月内,而单独使用缬沙坦后6个月至1年的不良事件更为普遍。据报道,沙比利/缬沙坦和缬沙坦单用的不良事件包括心力衰竭、心源性休克和心室颤动。仅考虑苏比里尔/缬沙坦,报告的不良事件包括肾功能损害、肾功能衰竭和急性肾损伤。单独使用缬沙坦,不良事件包括心律失常和心绞痛。结论:与单独使用缬沙坦相比,Sacubitril/缬沙坦具有更高的肾脏安全风险和更低的心脏安全风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the pharmacovigilance signals of cardiac and renal adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone based on the FAERS database.

Background: In clinical practice, cardiovascular and renal safety profiles of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with those of valsartan alone, remain controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the pharmacovigilance signals related to cardiovascular and renal adverse events between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Research design and methods: Raw report data on cardiac and renal adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone were retrieved from the FAERS database using preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Preferred terms were mapped to System Organ Classes, and the time to onset of adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone was calculated.

Results: Most adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan occurred within the first month, whereas adverse events were more prevalent 6 months to 1 year after administration of valsartan alone. Adverse events reported for sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan alone included cardiac failure, cardiogenic shock, and ventricular fibrillation. Considering sacubitril/valsartan only, adverse events reported were renal impairment, renal failure, and acute kidney injury. For valsartan alone, adverse events reported included arrhythmia and angina pectoris.

Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan carries a higher renal safety risk and lower cardiac safety risk than valsartan alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信