{"title":"在肺癌分期中增加食管支气管超声检查的效用:一项随机试验。","authors":"Masahide Oki, Hideo Saka, Yukio Seki, Yoshihito Kogure, Hideyuki Niwa, Arisa Yamada, Atsushi Torii, Chiyoe Kitagawa, Masahiko Ando","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00326-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Both combined endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) and transoesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasonography (EUS-B) and EBUS alone have been recommended for preoperative mediastinal staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised study comparing these two methods has been published. The purpose of the present study was to compare the sensitivity of EBUS and that of combined EBUS and EUS-B (EBUS/EUS-B) in terms of detecting N2/N3 disease during staging of NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with known or suspected, potentially operable NSCLC were recruited and randomised to undergo EBUS or EBUS/EUS-B under conscious sedation. The primary end-point was a comparison of the sensitivity of EBUS alone and EBUS/EUS-B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients were enrolled and randomised, among whom 219 (105 EBUS group; 114 EBUS/EUS-B group) were included in the analysis. The sensitivities of EBUS and EBUS/EUS-B in terms of detecting N2/N3 disease were 75.0% and 79.3% respectively (p=0.698). In the EBUS/EUS-B group, only EUS-B yielded diagnostic results in two patients; the sensitivity thus increased from 72.4% to 79.3% on addition of EUS-B to EBUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The difference in the sensitivities of EBUS alone and EBUS/EUS-B in terms of diagnosing N2/N3 disease was not statistically significant. Although the increase in sensitivity with the addition of EUS-B is modest, it is maximised when EUS-B is used to sample lymph nodes not accessible by EBUS alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of adding oesophageal to endobronchial endosonography when staging lung cancer: a randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Masahide Oki, Hideo Saka, Yukio Seki, Yoshihito Kogure, Hideyuki Niwa, Arisa Yamada, Atsushi Torii, Chiyoe Kitagawa, Masahiko Ando\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00326-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Both combined endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) and transoesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasonography (EUS-B) and EBUS alone have been recommended for preoperative mediastinal staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised study comparing these two methods has been published. The purpose of the present study was to compare the sensitivity of EBUS and that of combined EBUS and EUS-B (EBUS/EUS-B) in terms of detecting N2/N3 disease during staging of NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with known or suspected, potentially operable NSCLC were recruited and randomised to undergo EBUS or EBUS/EUS-B under conscious sedation. The primary end-point was a comparison of the sensitivity of EBUS alone and EBUS/EUS-B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients were enrolled and randomised, among whom 219 (105 EBUS group; 114 EBUS/EUS-B group) were included in the analysis. The sensitivities of EBUS and EBUS/EUS-B in terms of detecting N2/N3 disease were 75.0% and 79.3% respectively (p=0.698). In the EBUS/EUS-B group, only EUS-B yielded diagnostic results in two patients; the sensitivity thus increased from 72.4% to 79.3% on addition of EUS-B to EBUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The difference in the sensitivities of EBUS alone and EBUS/EUS-B in terms of diagnosing N2/N3 disease was not statistically significant. Although the increase in sensitivity with the addition of EUS-B is modest, it is maximised when EUS-B is used to sample lymph nodes not accessible by EBUS alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00326-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00326-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍:联合支气管超声检查(EBUS)和经食管支气管镜超声检查(EUS-B)以及单独使用EBUS已被推荐用于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的术前纵隔分期。然而,尚无比较这两种方法的随机研究发表。本研究的目的是比较EBUS和联合EBUS - b (EBUS/EUS-B)在NSCLC分期中检测N2/N3疾病的敏感性。方法:招募已知或疑似可能可手术的非小细胞肺癌患者并随机分组,在清醒镇静下接受EBUS或EBUS/EUS-B治疗。主要终点是比较单独使用EBUS和EBUS/EUS-B的敏感性。结果:共纳入并随机分组240例患者,其中219例(EBUS组105例;114例EBUS/EUS-B组)纳入分析。EBUS和EBUS/EUS-B检测N2/N3疾病的敏感性分别为75.0%和79.3% (p=0.698)。在EBUS/EUS-B组中,只有2例患者获得了EUS-B诊断结果;在EBUS中加入EUS-B后,灵敏度由72.4%提高到79.3%。结论:单独使用EBUS与EBUS/EUS-B诊断N2/N3疾病的敏感性差异无统计学意义。虽然加入EUS-B后灵敏度的增加是适度的,但当EUS-B用于单独使用EBUS无法到达的淋巴结时,灵敏度的增加是最大的。
Utility of adding oesophageal to endobronchial endosonography when staging lung cancer: a randomised trial.
Introduction: Both combined endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) and transoesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasonography (EUS-B) and EBUS alone have been recommended for preoperative mediastinal staging of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised study comparing these two methods has been published. The purpose of the present study was to compare the sensitivity of EBUS and that of combined EBUS and EUS-B (EBUS/EUS-B) in terms of detecting N2/N3 disease during staging of NSCLC.
Methods: Patients with known or suspected, potentially operable NSCLC were recruited and randomised to undergo EBUS or EBUS/EUS-B under conscious sedation. The primary end-point was a comparison of the sensitivity of EBUS alone and EBUS/EUS-B.
Results: A total of 240 patients were enrolled and randomised, among whom 219 (105 EBUS group; 114 EBUS/EUS-B group) were included in the analysis. The sensitivities of EBUS and EBUS/EUS-B in terms of detecting N2/N3 disease were 75.0% and 79.3% respectively (p=0.698). In the EBUS/EUS-B group, only EUS-B yielded diagnostic results in two patients; the sensitivity thus increased from 72.4% to 79.3% on addition of EUS-B to EBUS.
Conclusions: The difference in the sensitivities of EBUS alone and EBUS/EUS-B in terms of diagnosing N2/N3 disease was not statistically significant. Although the increase in sensitivity with the addition of EUS-B is modest, it is maximised when EUS-B is used to sample lymph nodes not accessible by EBUS alone.
期刊介绍:
ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.