探讨咳嗽发作的临床意义。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00316-2024
Kimberley J Holt, Rachel J Dockry, Kevin McGuinness, Emma Barrett, Jaclyn A Smith
{"title":"探讨咳嗽发作的临床意义。","authors":"Kimberley J Holt, Rachel J Dockry, Kevin McGuinness, Emma Barrett, Jaclyn A Smith","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00316-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The measurement of cough frequency is widely used in clinical trials, typically expressed as the number of explosive cough sounds per hour. However, this measure does not capture the clustering of coughs into bouts. Coughing bouts contribute to perceived cough severity and the physical complications of coughing, but an agreed standard definition of cough bouts is lacking. The objectives of the present study were to explore the impact of different definitions of cough bouts on the parameters generated, their relationships with reported cough severity and influence of age and gender in refractory chronic cough (RCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 24-h acoustic recordings and concurrent cough severity visual analogue scales from 91 RCC patients (62% female, median (interquartile range) age 60.0 (54-67.0) years). A custom-built algorithm calculated cough bouts, defined by the intervals between explosive cough sounds. Bouts defined by inter-cough intervals from ≤0.5 to ≤10 s (0.5 s increments) were explored, and parameters including number of bouts, median/maximum bout length and total bout duration calculated.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Using inter-cough intervals of >3 s to define cough bouts made little difference to cough bout parameters. Correlations between cough severity and bout parameters were weak but most likely to be significant when single coughs were removed. Cough-free time/total time spent coughing tended to have more influence on cough severity than the average cough bout length, irrespective of the interval used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These analyses favour definitions of cough bouts utilising inter-cough intervals of ≤3 s and the exclusion of single coughs from cough bout analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of clinically meaningful definitions of cough bouts.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberley J Holt, Rachel J Dockry, Kevin McGuinness, Emma Barrett, Jaclyn A Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00316-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The measurement of cough frequency is widely used in clinical trials, typically expressed as the number of explosive cough sounds per hour. However, this measure does not capture the clustering of coughs into bouts. Coughing bouts contribute to perceived cough severity and the physical complications of coughing, but an agreed standard definition of cough bouts is lacking. The objectives of the present study were to explore the impact of different definitions of cough bouts on the parameters generated, their relationships with reported cough severity and influence of age and gender in refractory chronic cough (RCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 24-h acoustic recordings and concurrent cough severity visual analogue scales from 91 RCC patients (62% female, median (interquartile range) age 60.0 (54-67.0) years). A custom-built algorithm calculated cough bouts, defined by the intervals between explosive cough sounds. Bouts defined by inter-cough intervals from ≤0.5 to ≤10 s (0.5 s increments) were explored, and parameters including number of bouts, median/maximum bout length and total bout duration calculated.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Using inter-cough intervals of >3 s to define cough bouts made little difference to cough bout parameters. Correlations between cough severity and bout parameters were weak but most likely to be significant when single coughs were removed. Cough-free time/total time spent coughing tended to have more influence on cough severity than the average cough bout length, irrespective of the interval used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These analyses favour definitions of cough bouts utilising inter-cough intervals of ≤3 s and the exclusion of single coughs from cough bout analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00316-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00316-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理:咳嗽频率的测量在临床试验中被广泛使用,通常表示为每小时爆炸性咳嗽声的次数。然而,这一措施并没有捕捉到咳嗽发作的聚集性。咳嗽发作有助于感知咳嗽的严重程度和咳嗽的身体并发症,但缺乏公认的咳嗽发作标准定义。本研究的目的是探讨不同咳嗽发作定义对难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)产生的参数的影响,它们与报告的咳嗽严重程度的关系以及年龄和性别的影响。方法:我们分析了91例RCC患者的24小时声学记录和并发咳嗽严重程度视觉模拟量表(62%为女性,中位(四分位数范围)年龄为60.0(54-67.0)岁)。一个定制的算法计算咳嗽次数,由爆炸性咳嗽声之间的间隔来定义。以咳嗽间隔≤0.5 ~≤10 s(增量0.5 s)定义的回合数,计算回合数、中位/最大回合长度和总回合持续时间等参数。测量结果及主要结果:以100 ~ 30 s的间隔时间来定义咳嗽发作,对咳嗽发作参数的影响不大。咳嗽严重程度与发作参数之间的相关性较弱,但当单次咳嗽被剔除时,相关性最有可能显著。不咳嗽时间/咳嗽总时间对咳嗽严重程度的影响大于平均咳嗽时间,与使用的间隔时间无关。结论:这些分析倾向于使用咳嗽间隔≤3 s来定义咳嗽发作,并将单次咳嗽排除在咳嗽发作分析之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploration of clinically meaningful definitions of cough bouts.

Rationale: The measurement of cough frequency is widely used in clinical trials, typically expressed as the number of explosive cough sounds per hour. However, this measure does not capture the clustering of coughs into bouts. Coughing bouts contribute to perceived cough severity and the physical complications of coughing, but an agreed standard definition of cough bouts is lacking. The objectives of the present study were to explore the impact of different definitions of cough bouts on the parameters generated, their relationships with reported cough severity and influence of age and gender in refractory chronic cough (RCC).

Methods: We analysed 24-h acoustic recordings and concurrent cough severity visual analogue scales from 91 RCC patients (62% female, median (interquartile range) age 60.0 (54-67.0) years). A custom-built algorithm calculated cough bouts, defined by the intervals between explosive cough sounds. Bouts defined by inter-cough intervals from ≤0.5 to ≤10 s (0.5 s increments) were explored, and parameters including number of bouts, median/maximum bout length and total bout duration calculated.

Measurements and main results: Using inter-cough intervals of >3 s to define cough bouts made little difference to cough bout parameters. Correlations between cough severity and bout parameters were weak but most likely to be significant when single coughs were removed. Cough-free time/total time spent coughing tended to have more influence on cough severity than the average cough bout length, irrespective of the interval used.

Conclusion: These analyses favour definitions of cough bouts utilising inter-cough intervals of ≤3 s and the exclusion of single coughs from cough bout analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信