急诊科社会支持项目Navigator干预后急诊医疗服务使用的变化:一项多中心回顾性前后研究

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryan D McHenry, Christine A Goodall
{"title":"急诊科社会支持项目Navigator干预后急诊医疗服务使用的变化:一项多中心回顾性前后研究","authors":"Ryan D McHenry, Christine A Goodall","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Patients living with social deprivation, and those with experiences of violence, substance misuse, mental ill-health and homelessness are known to use emergency departments (EDs) more often. It is not known whether a programme of social support initiated during ED attendance may lead to a reduction in healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the change in emergency, inpatient and outpatient healthcare use following a social support programme, Navigator, initiated during an ED attendance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective before-and-after study.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>Adult patients ≥16 years, attending EDs in the West of Scotland from 14th September 2016 to 10th March 2023, with a Navigator programme encounter.</p><p><strong>Intervention or exposure if any: </strong>The Navigator social support programme, delivered by trained support workers, initiated during ED attendance, and targeting patients affected by issues including violence, substance misuse, mental ill-health, domestic abuse and homelessness.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>Healthcare use rates in the 365 days following intervention, as change compared to those in the 365 days prior to the intervention. The primary outcome was the number of ED attendances in the year following intervention compared with the year prior to intervention. Secondary outcomes included inpatient admissions, inpatient bed days, outpatient appointments and outpatient appointments where the patient did not attend. Changes in use rates were analysed with negative binomial regression and reported as incidence rate ratios for interpretation as percentage change. Analysis was repeated for a subgroup of frequent attenders to the ED.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Of 1421 Navigator programme encounters, 1056 were included for analysis. Median attendance in the year prior to intervention was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-5], and in the year following intervention was 2 (IQR 0-4). Negative binomial regression demonstrated that in the year following Navigator intervention, there was a 29% (95% confidence interval: 24-33%) reduction in ED attendances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Navigator programme was associated with reduced emergency and acute healthcare use in the year following intervention, with increased scheduled outpatient care. There is the potential for a social support programme, delivered from the ED, to change patterns of healthcare use, and future work should consider prospectively assessing the impact of such an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in emergency healthcare use following intervention by Navigator, an emergency department social support programme: a multi-centre retrospective before-and-after study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan D McHenry, Christine A Goodall\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Patients living with social deprivation, and those with experiences of violence, substance misuse, mental ill-health and homelessness are known to use emergency departments (EDs) more often. It is not known whether a programme of social support initiated during ED attendance may lead to a reduction in healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the change in emergency, inpatient and outpatient healthcare use following a social support programme, Navigator, initiated during an ED attendance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective before-and-after study.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>Adult patients ≥16 years, attending EDs in the West of Scotland from 14th September 2016 to 10th March 2023, with a Navigator programme encounter.</p><p><strong>Intervention or exposure if any: </strong>The Navigator social support programme, delivered by trained support workers, initiated during ED attendance, and targeting patients affected by issues including violence, substance misuse, mental ill-health, domestic abuse and homelessness.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>Healthcare use rates in the 365 days following intervention, as change compared to those in the 365 days prior to the intervention. The primary outcome was the number of ED attendances in the year following intervention compared with the year prior to intervention. Secondary outcomes included inpatient admissions, inpatient bed days, outpatient appointments and outpatient appointments where the patient did not attend. Changes in use rates were analysed with negative binomial regression and reported as incidence rate ratios for interpretation as percentage change. Analysis was repeated for a subgroup of frequent attenders to the ED.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Of 1421 Navigator programme encounters, 1056 were included for analysis. Median attendance in the year prior to intervention was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-5], and in the year following intervention was 2 (IQR 0-4). Negative binomial regression demonstrated that in the year following Navigator intervention, there was a 29% (95% confidence interval: 24-33%) reduction in ED attendances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Navigator programme was associated with reduced emergency and acute healthcare use in the year following intervention, with increased scheduled outpatient care. There is the potential for a social support programme, delivered from the ED, to change patterns of healthcare use, and future work should consider prospectively assessing the impact of such an intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性:众所周知,生活在社会剥夺中的患者以及有暴力、药物滥用、精神疾病和无家可归经历的患者更常使用急诊科(ed)。目前尚不清楚在急诊科就诊期间启动的社会支持计划是否会导致医疗保健使用的减少。目的:本研究的目的是确定在急诊科就诊期间启动社会支持计划Navigator后急诊、住院和门诊医疗保健使用的变化。设计:前后回顾性研究。环境和参与者:2016年9月14日至2023年3月10日在苏格兰西部急诊科就诊的≥16岁的成年患者,并进行了Navigator项目的接触。干预或暴露(如果有的话):Navigator社会支持方案,由训练有素的支持工作人员提供,在急诊科就诊期间启动,针对受暴力、药物滥用、精神疾病、家庭虐待和无家可归等问题影响的患者。结果测量和分析:干预后365天的医疗保健使用率,与干预前365天相比的变化。主要结果是干预后一年与干预前一年的急诊就诊人数。次要结果包括住院人数、住院天数、门诊预约和患者未就诊的门诊预约。使用负二项回归分析使用率的变化,并以发病率比率报告,以百分比变化解释。对一个经常参加ed的亚组进行重复分析。主要结果:在1421次“领航员”项目中,有1056次被纳入分析。干预前一年的中位数出勤率为3[四分位数范围(IQR) 1-5],干预后一年为2 (IQR 0-4)。负二项回归表明,在Navigator干预后的一年中,急诊科的出勤率降低了29%(95%置信区间:24-33%)。结论:导航员计划与干预后一年内急诊和急性医疗保健使用减少有关,并增加了预定的门诊护理。由急诊科提供的社会支持方案有可能改变医疗保健使用模式,未来的工作应考虑前瞻性地评估这种干预措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in emergency healthcare use following intervention by Navigator, an emergency department social support programme: a multi-centre retrospective before-and-after study.

Background and importance: Patients living with social deprivation, and those with experiences of violence, substance misuse, mental ill-health and homelessness are known to use emergency departments (EDs) more often. It is not known whether a programme of social support initiated during ED attendance may lead to a reduction in healthcare use.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the change in emergency, inpatient and outpatient healthcare use following a social support programme, Navigator, initiated during an ED attendance.

Design: Retrospective before-and-after study.

Settings and participants: Adult patients ≥16 years, attending EDs in the West of Scotland from 14th September 2016 to 10th March 2023, with a Navigator programme encounter.

Intervention or exposure if any: The Navigator social support programme, delivered by trained support workers, initiated during ED attendance, and targeting patients affected by issues including violence, substance misuse, mental ill-health, domestic abuse and homelessness.

Outcome measures and analysis: Healthcare use rates in the 365 days following intervention, as change compared to those in the 365 days prior to the intervention. The primary outcome was the number of ED attendances in the year following intervention compared with the year prior to intervention. Secondary outcomes included inpatient admissions, inpatient bed days, outpatient appointments and outpatient appointments where the patient did not attend. Changes in use rates were analysed with negative binomial regression and reported as incidence rate ratios for interpretation as percentage change. Analysis was repeated for a subgroup of frequent attenders to the ED.

Main results: Of 1421 Navigator programme encounters, 1056 were included for analysis. Median attendance in the year prior to intervention was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-5], and in the year following intervention was 2 (IQR 0-4). Negative binomial regression demonstrated that in the year following Navigator intervention, there was a 29% (95% confidence interval: 24-33%) reduction in ED attendances.

Conclusion: The Navigator programme was associated with reduced emergency and acute healthcare use in the year following intervention, with increased scheduled outpatient care. There is the potential for a social support programme, delivered from the ED, to change patterns of healthcare use, and future work should consider prospectively assessing the impact of such an intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信