{"title":"羞耻感如何与膝骨关节炎的临床和社会心理结果相关?","authors":"Jia Ying Yeo, Chien Joo Lim, Su-Yin Yang, Bryan Yijia Tan","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition that often carries severe psychosocial implications. Chronic illness-related shame has emerged as a substantial psychosocial factor affecting individuals with knee OA, but it is unclear how chronic illness-related shame is associated with the long-term clinical and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with knee OA.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Does a higher level of shame correlate with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at baseline among individuals with knee OA? (2) Is a higher level of shame at baseline associated with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at 4-month and 12-month follow-up among individuals with knee OA? (3) Are sociodemographic characteristics correlated with levels of shame among individuals with knee OA?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2021 and February 2022, we screened 977 patients based on the inclusion criteria of (1) age 45 years or older, (2) independent in community mobility with or without walking aids, (3) proficient in English or Chinese language, and (4) met the clinical criteria for OA diagnosis outlined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Of these patients, 47% (460) were eligible and enrolled. A further 53% (517) were excluded for prespecified reasons. Of the 460 enrolled patients, 7% (30) dropped out before data collection began, and 46% (210) of patients did not complete the psychological questionnaires, leaving 48% (220) of patients for analysis. From this final sample, 25% (56) were lost to follow-up at 4 months, and an additional 7% (16) were lost by the 12-month follow-up, leaving 67% (148) of the original eligible group for analysis. All patients were recruited from the outpatient clinics of the orthopaedic and physiotherapy departments across two Singapore hospitals within the National Healthcare Group. The study population had a mean ± SD age of 64 ± 8 years, with 69% (152 of 220) women, and the mean ± SD duration of knee OA symptoms was 6 ± 6 years. Outcome measures used were the Chronic Illness-Related Shame Scale (CISS), the 12-item Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12), Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), the 8-item Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8), and the Brief Fear of Movement Scale (BFOM). The CISS is a validated tool specifically designed to measure feelings of shame (internal and external shame) in individuals living with chronic illness. The scale has been validated for use among patients with knee OA in Singapore. The functional outcome measure used was the Modified Barthel Index. Data on demographic characteristics were collected. Data were collected at baseline, 4-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses included the Spearman correlation, linear regression, and cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between CISS scores and KOOS-12 and ASES-8 scores (Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from -0.46 to -0.36; all p values < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of shame were associated with slightly to moderately worse knee function and lower self-efficacy. There was a modest positive correlation between CISS scores and PHQ-4 and BFOM scores (the Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.43 to 0.46; all p values < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of shame were linked to more psychological distress and greater fear of movement. At the 4-month follow-up, a higher CISS score at baseline was associated with a decrease in KOOS-12 (adjusted coefficient -0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.40]; p < 0.001) and ASES-8 (adjusted coefficient -0.12 [95% CI -0.19 to -0.06]; p < 0.001) scores, indicating worsened knee function and reduced self-efficacy over time. Higher CISS scores at baseline were also associated with an increase in PHQ-4 (adjusted coefficient 0.23 [95% CI 0.14 to 0.31]; p < 0.001) and BFOM (adjusted coefficient 0.22 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.36]; p = 0.002) scores at the 4-month follow-up, reflecting greater psychological distress and greater fear of movement. At the 12-month follow-up, a higher CISS score at baseline was associated with a decrease in KOOS-12 (adjusted coefficient -0.72 [95% CI -1.25 to -0.19]; p = 0.008) and ASES-8 (adjusted coefficient -0.12 [95% CI -0.20 to -0.04]; p = 0.002) scores, indicating that those with higher initial levels of shame continued to experience poorer knee function and lower self-efficacy. Higher CISS scores at baseline were also associated with an increase in PHQ-4 (adjusted coefficient 0.13 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.21]; p = 0.004) as well as BFOM (adjusted coefficient 0.20 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.34]; p = 0.007) scores at the 12-month follow-up, indicating ongoing psychological distress and fear of movement. Cluster analysis found that unemployed older patients with lower CISS scores and BMI, as well as having unilateral arthritis and shorter duration of OA, were observed to have better knee function at 4 months (mean difference 7 [95% CI 1 to 12]; p = 0.02) and 12 months (mean difference 7 [95% CI 1 to 13]; p = 0.02) compared with the opposite. After controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and employment status, the regression analysis found that higher BMI was related to higher CISS scores (adjusted coefficient 0.21 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.34]; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic illness-related shame has a small to modest association with clinical and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with knee OA. Healthcare professionals should routinely incorporate psychosocial assessments to identify and manage shame early, potentially improving both clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Recognizing that higher BMI is linked to increased shame can specifically guide targeted emotional and psychosocial support. Additionally, integrating interventions such as acceptance and commitment therapy and peer support with traditional treatments could enhance adherence and overall patient outcomes, making comprehensive care more effective.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, prognostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does Shame Relate to Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis?\",\"authors\":\"Jia Ying Yeo, Chien Joo Lim, Su-Yin Yang, Bryan Yijia Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition that often carries severe psychosocial implications. Chronic illness-related shame has emerged as a substantial psychosocial factor affecting individuals with knee OA, but it is unclear how chronic illness-related shame is associated with the long-term clinical and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with knee OA.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Does a higher level of shame correlate with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at baseline among individuals with knee OA? (2) Is a higher level of shame at baseline associated with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at 4-month and 12-month follow-up among individuals with knee OA? (3) Are sociodemographic characteristics correlated with levels of shame among individuals with knee OA?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2021 and February 2022, we screened 977 patients based on the inclusion criteria of (1) age 45 years or older, (2) independent in community mobility with or without walking aids, (3) proficient in English or Chinese language, and (4) met the clinical criteria for OA diagnosis outlined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Of these patients, 47% (460) were eligible and enrolled. A further 53% (517) were excluded for prespecified reasons. Of the 460 enrolled patients, 7% (30) dropped out before data collection began, and 46% (210) of patients did not complete the psychological questionnaires, leaving 48% (220) of patients for analysis. From this final sample, 25% (56) were lost to follow-up at 4 months, and an additional 7% (16) were lost by the 12-month follow-up, leaving 67% (148) of the original eligible group for analysis. All patients were recruited from the outpatient clinics of the orthopaedic and physiotherapy departments across two Singapore hospitals within the National Healthcare Group. The study population had a mean ± SD age of 64 ± 8 years, with 69% (152 of 220) women, and the mean ± SD duration of knee OA symptoms was 6 ± 6 years. Outcome measures used were the Chronic Illness-Related Shame Scale (CISS), the 12-item Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12), Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), the 8-item Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8), and the Brief Fear of Movement Scale (BFOM). The CISS is a validated tool specifically designed to measure feelings of shame (internal and external shame) in individuals living with chronic illness. The scale has been validated for use among patients with knee OA in Singapore. The functional outcome measure used was the Modified Barthel Index. Data on demographic characteristics were collected. Data were collected at baseline, 4-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses included the Spearman correlation, linear regression, and cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between CISS scores and KOOS-12 and ASES-8 scores (Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from -0.46 to -0.36; all p values < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of shame were associated with slightly to moderately worse knee function and lower self-efficacy. There was a modest positive correlation between CISS scores and PHQ-4 and BFOM scores (the Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.43 to 0.46; all p values < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of shame were linked to more psychological distress and greater fear of movement. At the 4-month follow-up, a higher CISS score at baseline was associated with a decrease in KOOS-12 (adjusted coefficient -0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.40]; p < 0.001) and ASES-8 (adjusted coefficient -0.12 [95% CI -0.19 to -0.06]; p < 0.001) scores, indicating worsened knee function and reduced self-efficacy over time. Higher CISS scores at baseline were also associated with an increase in PHQ-4 (adjusted coefficient 0.23 [95% CI 0.14 to 0.31]; p < 0.001) and BFOM (adjusted coefficient 0.22 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.36]; p = 0.002) scores at the 4-month follow-up, reflecting greater psychological distress and greater fear of movement. At the 12-month follow-up, a higher CISS score at baseline was associated with a decrease in KOOS-12 (adjusted coefficient -0.72 [95% CI -1.25 to -0.19]; p = 0.008) and ASES-8 (adjusted coefficient -0.12 [95% CI -0.20 to -0.04]; p = 0.002) scores, indicating that those with higher initial levels of shame continued to experience poorer knee function and lower self-efficacy. Higher CISS scores at baseline were also associated with an increase in PHQ-4 (adjusted coefficient 0.13 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.21]; p = 0.004) as well as BFOM (adjusted coefficient 0.20 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.34]; p = 0.007) scores at the 12-month follow-up, indicating ongoing psychological distress and fear of movement. Cluster analysis found that unemployed older patients with lower CISS scores and BMI, as well as having unilateral arthritis and shorter duration of OA, were observed to have better knee function at 4 months (mean difference 7 [95% CI 1 to 12]; p = 0.02) and 12 months (mean difference 7 [95% CI 1 to 13]; p = 0.02) compared with the opposite. After controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and employment status, the regression analysis found that higher BMI was related to higher CISS scores (adjusted coefficient 0.21 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.34]; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic illness-related shame has a small to modest association with clinical and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with knee OA. Healthcare professionals should routinely incorporate psychosocial assessments to identify and manage shame early, potentially improving both clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Recognizing that higher BMI is linked to increased shame can specifically guide targeted emotional and psychosocial support. Additionally, integrating interventions such as acceptance and commitment therapy and peer support with traditional treatments could enhance adherence and overall patient outcomes, making comprehensive care more effective.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, prognostic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003329\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:膝骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见的致残疾病,通常会带来严重的社会心理影响。慢性疾病相关羞耻感已成为影响膝关节OA患者的重要社会心理因素,但目前尚不清楚慢性疾病相关羞耻感如何与膝关节OA患者的长期临床和社会心理结果相关。问题/目的:(1)在膝关节炎患者中,较高的羞耻感水平是否与基线时较差的临床和社会心理结果相关?(2)在膝关节OA患者中,基线时较高的羞耻感水平是否与4个月和12个月随访时较差的临床和社会心理结果相关?(3)社会人口学特征是否与膝关节OA患者的羞耻感水平相关?方法:在2021年6月至2022年2月期间,我们根据以下纳入标准筛选了977名患者:(1)年龄在45岁或以上,(2)有或没有助行器在社区独立活动,(3)精通英语或中文,(4)符合国家健康与护理卓越研究所概述的OA诊断临床标准。在这些患者中,47%(460)人符合条件并入组。另有53%(517人)因预先指定的原因被排除在外。在460名入组患者中,7%(30名)的患者在数据收集开始前退出,46%(210名)的患者没有完成心理问卷调查,剩下48%(220名)的患者进行分析。在最后的样本中,25%(56例)在4个月时失去了随访,另外7%(16例)在12个月的随访中失去了随访,剩下67%(148例)的原始合格组进行分析。所有患者均来自国家医疗集团旗下两家新加坡医院骨科和理疗部门的门诊诊所。研究人群的平均±SD年龄为64±8岁,其中69%(220人中有152人)为女性,膝关节OA症状的平均±SD持续时间为6±6年。结果测量采用慢性疾病相关羞耻感量表(CISS)、12项膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS-12)、患者健康问卷4 (PHQ-4)、8项关节炎自我效能量表(ASES-8)和短暂运动恐惧量表(bom)。CISS是一种经过验证的工具,专门用于测量慢性疾病患者的羞耻感(内部和外部羞耻感)。该量表已在新加坡的膝关节OA患者中得到验证。功能性结果测量采用改良Barthel指数。收集了人口统计学特征数据。在基线、4个月随访和12个月随访时收集数据。统计分析包括Spearman相关、线性回归和聚类分析。结果:基线时,CISS评分与KOOS-12和ASES-8评分呈弱至中度负相关(Spearman相关系数范围为-0.46 ~ -0.36;所有p值均< 0.001),表明较高水平的羞耻感与轻度至中度的膝关节功能恶化和较低的自我效能感相关。CISS评分与PHQ-4和BFOM评分呈中度正相关(Spearman相关系数为0.43 ~ 0.46;所有p值都< 0.001),表明更高水平的羞耻感与更多的心理困扰和更大的运动恐惧有关。在4个月的随访中,基线时较高的CISS评分与KOOS-12的降低相关(校正系数-0.86[95%可信区间(CI) -1.33至-0.40];p < 0.001)和asas -8(校正系数-0.12 [95% CI -0.19至-0.06];P < 0.001)评分,表明随着时间的推移,膝关节功能恶化,自我效能降低。基线时较高的CISS评分也与PHQ-4升高相关(校正系数0.23 [95% CI 0.14至0.31];p < 0.001)和BFOM(校正系数0.22 [95% CI 0.08 ~ 0.36];P = 0.002),在4个月的随访中,反映出更大的心理困扰和更大的运动恐惧。在12个月的随访中,基线时较高的CISS评分与KOOS-12的降低相关(校正系数-0.72 [95% CI -1.25至-0.19];p = 0.008)和asas -8(校正系数-0.12 [95% CI -0.20至-0.04];P = 0.002)得分,表明那些最初羞耻感水平较高的人继续经历较差的膝盖功能和较低的自我效能感。基线时较高的CISS评分也与PHQ-4升高相关(校正系数0.13 [95% CI 0.04至0.21];p = 0.004)和bbfm(校正系数0.20 [95% CI 0.06 ~ 0.34];P = 0.007)在12个月的随访中得分,表明持续的心理困扰和运动恐惧。 聚类分析发现,CISS评分和BMI较低、单侧关节炎和OA持续时间较短的失业老年患者在4个月时的膝关节功能较好(平均差值为7 [95% CI 1 ~ 12];p = 0.02)和12个月(平均差异7 [95% CI 1 ~ 13];P = 0.02)。在控制了年龄、性别、种族和就业状况后,回归分析发现BMI越高,CISS评分越高(校正系数0.21 [95% CI 0.07 ~ 0.34];P = 0.003)。结论:慢性疾病相关羞耻感与膝关节OA患者的临床和社会心理结果有小到中等程度的关联。卫生保健专业人员应定期纳入社会心理评估,以及早发现和管理羞耻感,从而潜在地改善临床和社会心理结果。认识到较高的身体质量指数与羞耻感的增加有关,可以专门指导有针对性的情感和社会心理支持。此外,将接受和承诺治疗以及同伴支持等干预措施与传统治疗相结合,可以提高依从性和患者的总体结果,使综合护理更加有效。证据等级:II级,预后研究。
How Does Shame Relate to Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis?
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition that often carries severe psychosocial implications. Chronic illness-related shame has emerged as a substantial psychosocial factor affecting individuals with knee OA, but it is unclear how chronic illness-related shame is associated with the long-term clinical and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with knee OA.
Questions/purposes: (1) Does a higher level of shame correlate with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at baseline among individuals with knee OA? (2) Is a higher level of shame at baseline associated with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at 4-month and 12-month follow-up among individuals with knee OA? (3) Are sociodemographic characteristics correlated with levels of shame among individuals with knee OA?
Methods: Between June 2021 and February 2022, we screened 977 patients based on the inclusion criteria of (1) age 45 years or older, (2) independent in community mobility with or without walking aids, (3) proficient in English or Chinese language, and (4) met the clinical criteria for OA diagnosis outlined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Of these patients, 47% (460) were eligible and enrolled. A further 53% (517) were excluded for prespecified reasons. Of the 460 enrolled patients, 7% (30) dropped out before data collection began, and 46% (210) of patients did not complete the psychological questionnaires, leaving 48% (220) of patients for analysis. From this final sample, 25% (56) were lost to follow-up at 4 months, and an additional 7% (16) were lost by the 12-month follow-up, leaving 67% (148) of the original eligible group for analysis. All patients were recruited from the outpatient clinics of the orthopaedic and physiotherapy departments across two Singapore hospitals within the National Healthcare Group. The study population had a mean ± SD age of 64 ± 8 years, with 69% (152 of 220) women, and the mean ± SD duration of knee OA symptoms was 6 ± 6 years. Outcome measures used were the Chronic Illness-Related Shame Scale (CISS), the 12-item Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12), Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), the 8-item Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8), and the Brief Fear of Movement Scale (BFOM). The CISS is a validated tool specifically designed to measure feelings of shame (internal and external shame) in individuals living with chronic illness. The scale has been validated for use among patients with knee OA in Singapore. The functional outcome measure used was the Modified Barthel Index. Data on demographic characteristics were collected. Data were collected at baseline, 4-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses included the Spearman correlation, linear regression, and cluster analysis.
Results: At baseline, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between CISS scores and KOOS-12 and ASES-8 scores (Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from -0.46 to -0.36; all p values < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of shame were associated with slightly to moderately worse knee function and lower self-efficacy. There was a modest positive correlation between CISS scores and PHQ-4 and BFOM scores (the Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.43 to 0.46; all p values < 0.001), indicating that higher levels of shame were linked to more psychological distress and greater fear of movement. At the 4-month follow-up, a higher CISS score at baseline was associated with a decrease in KOOS-12 (adjusted coefficient -0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.40]; p < 0.001) and ASES-8 (adjusted coefficient -0.12 [95% CI -0.19 to -0.06]; p < 0.001) scores, indicating worsened knee function and reduced self-efficacy over time. Higher CISS scores at baseline were also associated with an increase in PHQ-4 (adjusted coefficient 0.23 [95% CI 0.14 to 0.31]; p < 0.001) and BFOM (adjusted coefficient 0.22 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.36]; p = 0.002) scores at the 4-month follow-up, reflecting greater psychological distress and greater fear of movement. At the 12-month follow-up, a higher CISS score at baseline was associated with a decrease in KOOS-12 (adjusted coefficient -0.72 [95% CI -1.25 to -0.19]; p = 0.008) and ASES-8 (adjusted coefficient -0.12 [95% CI -0.20 to -0.04]; p = 0.002) scores, indicating that those with higher initial levels of shame continued to experience poorer knee function and lower self-efficacy. Higher CISS scores at baseline were also associated with an increase in PHQ-4 (adjusted coefficient 0.13 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.21]; p = 0.004) as well as BFOM (adjusted coefficient 0.20 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.34]; p = 0.007) scores at the 12-month follow-up, indicating ongoing psychological distress and fear of movement. Cluster analysis found that unemployed older patients with lower CISS scores and BMI, as well as having unilateral arthritis and shorter duration of OA, were observed to have better knee function at 4 months (mean difference 7 [95% CI 1 to 12]; p = 0.02) and 12 months (mean difference 7 [95% CI 1 to 13]; p = 0.02) compared with the opposite. After controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and employment status, the regression analysis found that higher BMI was related to higher CISS scores (adjusted coefficient 0.21 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.34]; p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Chronic illness-related shame has a small to modest association with clinical and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with knee OA. Healthcare professionals should routinely incorporate psychosocial assessments to identify and manage shame early, potentially improving both clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Recognizing that higher BMI is linked to increased shame can specifically guide targeted emotional and psychosocial support. Additionally, integrating interventions such as acceptance and commitment therapy and peer support with traditional treatments could enhance adherence and overall patient outcomes, making comprehensive care more effective.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge.
CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.