在家自行收集药代动力学数据:1期开放标签可行性试验的设计和结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Arash Raoufinia, Susan E. Shoaf, Brian Rothman, Chelsea Ye, Chris Chung
{"title":"在家自行收集药代动力学数据:1期开放标签可行性试验的设计和结果。","authors":"Arash Raoufinia,&nbsp;Susan E. Shoaf,&nbsp;Brian Rothman,&nbsp;Chelsea Ye,&nbsp;Chris Chung","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies pose unique technical challenges. We present the design of a Phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence, PK trial that aimed to compare the timing accuracy of participant- versus staff-collected data, and we provide safety and tolerability outcomes for centanafadine treatment. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years received a single 100-mg centanafadine sustained-release tablet at Visits 1, 2, and 4. PK samples (venous sampling and blood microsampling) and safety assessments (12-lead electrocardiograms [ECGs] and vital signs) were collected by clinical site staff only at Visit 1. At Visit 2, site staff collected venous blood, and participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs under staff supervision. At Visit 4, participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs remotely. The absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times for PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs are reported descriptively. Of the 20 participants, at least 75% obtained blood microsamples within 10 minutes of the planned nominal time. Absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times of ECGs and vital signs were small. No adverse events were related to treatment. Overall, results support the feasibility of at-home collection of PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At-Home Self-Collection of Pharmacokinetic Data: Design and Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Feasibility Trial\",\"authors\":\"Arash Raoufinia,&nbsp;Susan E. Shoaf,&nbsp;Brian Rothman,&nbsp;Chelsea Ye,&nbsp;Chris Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies pose unique technical challenges. We present the design of a Phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence, PK trial that aimed to compare the timing accuracy of participant- versus staff-collected data, and we provide safety and tolerability outcomes for centanafadine treatment. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years received a single 100-mg centanafadine sustained-release tablet at Visits 1, 2, and 4. PK samples (venous sampling and blood microsampling) and safety assessments (12-lead electrocardiograms [ECGs] and vital signs) were collected by clinical site staff only at Visit 1. At Visit 2, site staff collected venous blood, and participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs under staff supervision. At Visit 4, participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs remotely. The absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times for PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs are reported descriptively. Of the 20 participants, at least 75% obtained blood microsamples within 10 minutes of the planned nominal time. Absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times of ECGs and vital signs were small. No adverse events were related to treatment. Overall, results support the feasibility of at-home collection of PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"11-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1495\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1495\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药代动力学(PK)研究提出了独特的技术挑战。我们设计了一项1期、开放标签、固定序列、PK试验,旨在比较参与者和工作人员收集数据的时间准确性,并提供了西他那定治疗的安全性和耐受性结果。年龄在18-55岁的健康成年人在就诊1、2和4次时服用单片100毫克的centanafadine缓释片。PK样本(静脉采样和血液显微采样)和安全性评估(12导联心电图和生命体征)仅在就诊1时由临床现场工作人员收集。来访2时,现场工作人员采集静脉血,参与者在工作人员监护下采集血液显微标本、6导联心电图及生命体征。在第4次就诊时,参与者获得了血液显微样本、6导联心电图和远程生命体征。实际和计划的收集时间之间的绝对差异的PK样品,心电图和生命体征的描述性报告。在20名参与者中,至少75%的人在计划的名义时间的10分钟内获得了血液显微样本。心电图和生命体征的实际收集时间与计划收集时间的绝对差异很小。无与治疗相关的不良事件。总体而言,结果支持在家采集PK样本、心电图和生命体征的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
At-Home Self-Collection of Pharmacokinetic Data: Design and Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Feasibility Trial

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies pose unique technical challenges. We present the design of a Phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence, PK trial that aimed to compare the timing accuracy of participant- versus staff-collected data, and we provide safety and tolerability outcomes for centanafadine treatment. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years received a single 100-mg centanafadine sustained-release tablet at Visits 1, 2, and 4. PK samples (venous sampling and blood microsampling) and safety assessments (12-lead electrocardiograms [ECGs] and vital signs) were collected by clinical site staff only at Visit 1. At Visit 2, site staff collected venous blood, and participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs under staff supervision. At Visit 4, participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs remotely. The absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times for PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs are reported descriptively. Of the 20 participants, at least 75% obtained blood microsamples within 10 minutes of the planned nominal time. Absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times of ECGs and vital signs were small. No adverse events were related to treatment. Overall, results support the feasibility of at-home collection of PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信