一项评估群体药代动力学模型选择对新生儿万古霉素初始剂量建议影响的模拟研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mehdi El Hassani, Mathieu Blouin, Amélie Marsot
{"title":"一项评估群体药代动力学模型选择对新生儿万古霉素初始剂量建议影响的模拟研究。","authors":"Mehdi El Hassani, Mathieu Blouin, Amélie Marsot","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The accuracy of model-informed precision dosing largely depends on selecting the most appropriate population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model from many available options. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of optimal initial simulated doses among various vancomycin popPK models developed in neonates and to explore the role of predictive performance in explaining the variability in probability of target attainment (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A virtual neonatal patient population was created and 26 previously externally evaluated vancomycin popPK models were used to simulate 5 different dosing regimens. For each simulated scenario, the area under the concentration-time curve and PTA were calculated to assess the agreement on optimal initial doses across the 26 models. A multiple regression was performed to explore the impact of the models' predictive performance on PTA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For most models (15/26), there was an agreement on the optimal dosing regimen. The highest PTA being achieved by the model with the best a priori predictive performance. The multiple regression model significantly predicted mean ln-transformed PTA, with F(2, 23) = 5.406 and P = .010, yielding an adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of .21. PTA was significantly influenced by imprecision (P = .048) but not bias (P = .469).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our study demonstrated that, despite the variability in bias and imprecision, there was a consensus on the initial optimal doses for the majority of models; however, models with superior a priori predictive performance yielded higher PTA values. Bias and imprecision alone only seem to predict a small proportion of the variability in PTA, with imprecision having a more pronounced effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simulation study to assess the influence of population pharmacokinetic model selection on initial dosing recommendations of vancomycin in neonates.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi El Hassani, Mathieu Blouin, Amélie Marsot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The accuracy of model-informed precision dosing largely depends on selecting the most appropriate population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model from many available options. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of optimal initial simulated doses among various vancomycin popPK models developed in neonates and to explore the role of predictive performance in explaining the variability in probability of target attainment (PTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A virtual neonatal patient population was created and 26 previously externally evaluated vancomycin popPK models were used to simulate 5 different dosing regimens. For each simulated scenario, the area under the concentration-time curve and PTA were calculated to assess the agreement on optimal initial doses across the 26 models. A multiple regression was performed to explore the impact of the models' predictive performance on PTA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For most models (15/26), there was an agreement on the optimal dosing regimen. The highest PTA being achieved by the model with the best a priori predictive performance. The multiple regression model significantly predicted mean ln-transformed PTA, with F(2, 23) = 5.406 and P = .010, yielding an adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of .21. PTA was significantly influenced by imprecision (P = .048) but not bias (P = .469).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our study demonstrated that, despite the variability in bias and imprecision, there was a consensus on the initial optimal doses for the majority of models; however, models with superior a priori predictive performance yielded higher PTA values. Bias and imprecision alone only seem to predict a small proportion of the variability in PTA, with imprecision having a more pronounced effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:模型信息精确给药的准确性很大程度上取决于从许多可用的选择中选择最合适的群体药代动力学(popPK)模型。本研究旨在评估在新生儿中开发的各种万古霉素popPK模型中最佳初始模拟剂量的一致性,并探讨预测性能在解释目标实现概率(PTA)变异性中的作用。方法:创建虚拟新生儿患者群体,并使用26个先前外部评估的万古霉素popPK模型来模拟5种不同的给药方案。对于每个模拟情景,计算浓度-时间曲线下的面积和PTA,以评估26种模型对最佳初始剂量的一致性。采用多元回归方法探讨模型的预测性能对PTA的影响。结果:大多数模型(15/26)的最佳给药方案一致。该模型的PTA最高,先验预测性能最好。多元回归模型显著预测平均ln转换PTA, F(2,23) = 5.406, P = 0.010,调整后R2为0.21。不精确性对PTA有显著影响(P = 0.048),偏倚对PTA无显著影响(P = 0.469)。结论:总之,我们的研究表明,尽管存在偏差和不精确的可变性,但大多数模型的初始最佳剂量是一致的;然而,具有优越先验预测性能的模型产生更高的PTA值。单独的偏差和不精确似乎只能预测PTA变异性的一小部分,而不精确具有更明显的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simulation study to assess the influence of population pharmacokinetic model selection on initial dosing recommendations of vancomycin in neonates.

Aims: The accuracy of model-informed precision dosing largely depends on selecting the most appropriate population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model from many available options. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of optimal initial simulated doses among various vancomycin popPK models developed in neonates and to explore the role of predictive performance in explaining the variability in probability of target attainment (PTA).

Methods: A virtual neonatal patient population was created and 26 previously externally evaluated vancomycin popPK models were used to simulate 5 different dosing regimens. For each simulated scenario, the area under the concentration-time curve and PTA were calculated to assess the agreement on optimal initial doses across the 26 models. A multiple regression was performed to explore the impact of the models' predictive performance on PTA.

Results: For most models (15/26), there was an agreement on the optimal dosing regimen. The highest PTA being achieved by the model with the best a priori predictive performance. The multiple regression model significantly predicted mean ln-transformed PTA, with F(2, 23) = 5.406 and P = .010, yielding an adjusted R2 of .21. PTA was significantly influenced by imprecision (P = .048) but not bias (P = .469).

Conclusion: In conclusion, our study demonstrated that, despite the variability in bias and imprecision, there was a consensus on the initial optimal doses for the majority of models; however, models with superior a priori predictive performance yielded higher PTA values. Bias and imprecision alone only seem to predict a small proportion of the variability in PTA, with imprecision having a more pronounced effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信