2010年更新(标准操作程序):2024年英国胃肠学会炎症性肠病结肠直肠监测指南方案。

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Morris Gordon, Gaurav Bhaskar Nigam, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Ibrahim Al Bakir, Adrian C Bateman, Shahida Din, Sunil Dolwani, Anjan Dhar, O D Faiz, Bu Hayee, Chris Healey, Christopher Andrew Lamb, Simon Leedham, Misha Kabir, Marietta Iacucci, Ailsa Hart, A John Morris, Marco Novelli, Tim Raine, Matt Rutter, Neil A Shepherd, Venkataraman Subramanian, Nigel J Trudgill, Maggie Vance, Ana Wilson, Lydia White, Ruth Wakeman, James E East
{"title":"2010年更新(标准操作程序):2024年英国胃肠学会炎症性肠病结肠直肠监测指南方案。","authors":"Morris Gordon, Gaurav Bhaskar Nigam, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Ibrahim Al Bakir, Adrian C Bateman, Shahida Din, Sunil Dolwani, Anjan Dhar, O D Faiz, Bu Hayee, Chris Healey, Christopher Andrew Lamb, Simon Leedham, Misha Kabir, Marietta Iacucci, Ailsa Hart, A John Morris, Marco Novelli, Tim Raine, Matt Rutter, Neil A Shepherd, Venkataraman Subramanian, Nigel J Trudgill, Maggie Vance, Ana Wilson, Lydia White, Ruth Wakeman, James E East","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The evolving landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) necessitates refining colonoscopic surveillance guidelines. This study outlines methodology adopted by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guideline Development Group (GDG) for updating IBD colorectal surveillance guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The 'Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) approach, as outlined in the GRADE handbook, was employed. Thematic questions were formulated using either the 'patient, intervention, comparison and outcome' format or the 'current state of knowledge, area of interest, potential impact and suggestions from experts in the field' format. The evidence review process included systematic reviews assessed using appropriate appraisal tools. An extensive list of potential outcomes was compiled from literature and expert consultations and then ranked by GDG members. The top outcomes were identified for evidence synthesis in three key areas: utility of surveillance in IBD, quality of bowel preparation and use of advanced imaging techniques in colonoscopy for IBD. Risk thresholding exercises determined specific risk levels for different surveillance strategies and intervals. This approach enabled the GDG to establish precise thresholds for interventions based on relative and absolute risk assessments, directly informing the stratification of surveillance recommendations. Significance of effect sizes (small, moderate, large) will guide the final GRADE assessment of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval is not applicable. By integrating clinical expertise, patient experiences and innovative methodologies like risk thresholding, we aim to deliver actionable recommendations for IBD colorectal surveillance. This protocol, complementing the main guidelines, offers GDGs, clinical trialists and practitioners a framework to inform future research and enhance patient care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update from 2010 (standard operating procedure): protocol for the 2024 British Society of Gastroenterology Guidelines on colorectal surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.\",\"authors\":\"Morris Gordon, Gaurav Bhaskar Nigam, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Ibrahim Al Bakir, Adrian C Bateman, Shahida Din, Sunil Dolwani, Anjan Dhar, O D Faiz, Bu Hayee, Chris Healey, Christopher Andrew Lamb, Simon Leedham, Misha Kabir, Marietta Iacucci, Ailsa Hart, A John Morris, Marco Novelli, Tim Raine, Matt Rutter, Neil A Shepherd, Venkataraman Subramanian, Nigel J Trudgill, Maggie Vance, Ana Wilson, Lydia White, Ruth Wakeman, James E East\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The evolving landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) necessitates refining colonoscopic surveillance guidelines. This study outlines methodology adopted by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guideline Development Group (GDG) for updating IBD colorectal surveillance guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The 'Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) approach, as outlined in the GRADE handbook, was employed. Thematic questions were formulated using either the 'patient, intervention, comparison and outcome' format or the 'current state of knowledge, area of interest, potential impact and suggestions from experts in the field' format. The evidence review process included systematic reviews assessed using appropriate appraisal tools. An extensive list of potential outcomes was compiled from literature and expert consultations and then ranked by GDG members. The top outcomes were identified for evidence synthesis in three key areas: utility of surveillance in IBD, quality of bowel preparation and use of advanced imaging techniques in colonoscopy for IBD. Risk thresholding exercises determined specific risk levels for different surveillance strategies and intervals. This approach enabled the GDG to establish precise thresholds for interventions based on relative and absolute risk assessments, directly informing the stratification of surveillance recommendations. Significance of effect sizes (small, moderate, large) will guide the final GRADE assessment of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval is not applicable. By integrating clinical expertise, patient experiences and innovative methodologies like risk thresholding, we aim to deliver actionable recommendations for IBD colorectal surveillance. This protocol, complementing the main guidelines, offers GDGs, clinical trialists and practitioners a framework to inform future research and enhance patient care and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:炎症性肠病(IBD)的发展需要完善结肠镜监测指南。本研究概述了英国胃肠病学会(BSG)指南制定小组(GDG)更新IBD结肠直肠监测指南所采用的方法。方法和分析:采用GRADE手册中概述的“建议、评估、发展和评估分级”(GRADE)方法。主题问题采用“耐心、干预、比较和结果”格式或“目前的知识状况、感兴趣的领域、潜在影响和该领域专家的建议”格式编制。证据审查过程包括使用适当的评价工具进行的系统评价。根据文献和专家咨询汇编了一份广泛的潜在结果清单,然后由GDG成员进行排名。在三个关键领域确定了证据合成的最佳结果:IBD监测的效用,肠道准备的质量和IBD结肠镜检查中先进成像技术的使用。风险阈值练习确定了不同监测策略和间隔的具体风险水平。这种方法使GDG能够根据相对和绝对风险评估确定干预措施的精确阈值,直接为监测建议的分层提供信息。效应大小(小、中、大)的显著性将指导证据的最终GRADE评估。伦理与传播:伦理审批不适用。通过整合临床专业知识、患者经验和风险阈值等创新方法,我们的目标是为IBD结肠直肠监测提供可操作的建议。该方案补充了主要指南,为GDGs、临床试验人员和从业人员提供了一个框架,为未来的研究提供信息,并加强患者护理和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Update from 2010 (standard operating procedure): protocol for the 2024 British Society of Gastroenterology Guidelines on colorectal surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.

Introduction: The evolving landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) necessitates refining colonoscopic surveillance guidelines. This study outlines methodology adopted by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guideline Development Group (GDG) for updating IBD colorectal surveillance guidelines.

Methods and analysis: The 'Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) approach, as outlined in the GRADE handbook, was employed. Thematic questions were formulated using either the 'patient, intervention, comparison and outcome' format or the 'current state of knowledge, area of interest, potential impact and suggestions from experts in the field' format. The evidence review process included systematic reviews assessed using appropriate appraisal tools. An extensive list of potential outcomes was compiled from literature and expert consultations and then ranked by GDG members. The top outcomes were identified for evidence synthesis in three key areas: utility of surveillance in IBD, quality of bowel preparation and use of advanced imaging techniques in colonoscopy for IBD. Risk thresholding exercises determined specific risk levels for different surveillance strategies and intervals. This approach enabled the GDG to establish precise thresholds for interventions based on relative and absolute risk assessments, directly informing the stratification of surveillance recommendations. Significance of effect sizes (small, moderate, large) will guide the final GRADE assessment of the evidence.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not applicable. By integrating clinical expertise, patient experiences and innovative methodologies like risk thresholding, we aim to deliver actionable recommendations for IBD colorectal surveillance. This protocol, complementing the main guidelines, offers GDGs, clinical trialists and practitioners a framework to inform future research and enhance patient care and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信