粪便菌群移植对散发性肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Renyi Feng, Qingyong Zhu, Ao Wang, Hanzhen Wang, Jiuqi Wang, Pei Chen, Rui Zhang, Dongxiao Liang, Junfang Teng, Mingming Ma, Xuebing Ding, Xuejing Wang
{"title":"粪便菌群移植对散发性肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Renyi Feng, Qingyong Zhu, Ao Wang, Hanzhen Wang, Jiuqi Wang, Pei Chen, Rui Zhang, Dongxiao Liang, Junfang Teng, Mingming Ma, Xuebing Ding, Xuejing Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03781-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder marked by the progressive loss of motor neurons. Recent insights into ALS pathogenesis underscore the pivotal role of the gut microbiome, prompting an investigation into the potential therapeutic impact of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on sporadic ALS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial, the study enrolled 27 participants from October 2022 to April 2023. The participants were followed up for 6 months from February 2023 to October 2023, during in-person visits at baseline, week 15, week 23, and week 35. The participants, evenly randomized, received either healthy donor FMT (FMT, n = 14) or a mixture of 0.9% saline and food coloring (E150c) as sham transplantation (placebo, n = 13). The primary outcome measured the change in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score from baseline to week 35. Secondary outcomes included changes in gastrointestinal and respiratory functions, muscle strength, autonomic function, cognition, quality of life, intestinal microbiome composition, and plasm neurofilament light chain protein (NFL). Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 randomized patients (47% women; mean age, 67.2 years), 24 participants completed the entire study. Notably, ALSFRS-R score changes exhibited no significant differences between FMT (6.1 [SD, 3.11]) and placebo (6.41[SD, 2.73]) groups from baseline to week 35. Secondary efficacy outcomes, encompassing respiratory function, muscle strength, autonomic function, cognition, quality of life, and plasm NFL, showed no significant differences. Nevertheless, the FMT group exhibited improvements in constipation, depression, and anxiety symptoms. FMT induced a shift in gut microbiome community composition, marked by increased abundance of Bifidobacterium, which persisted until week 15 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.28; p = 0.01). Gastrointestinal adverse events were the primary manifestations of FMT-related side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this clinical trial involving 27 sporadic ALS patients, FMT did not significantly slow the decline in ALSFRS-R score. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of FMT in sporadic ALS patients and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR 2200064504.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"566"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Renyi Feng, Qingyong Zhu, Ao Wang, Hanzhen Wang, Jiuqi Wang, Pei Chen, Rui Zhang, Dongxiao Liang, Junfang Teng, Mingming Ma, Xuebing Ding, Xuejing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-024-03781-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder marked by the progressive loss of motor neurons. Recent insights into ALS pathogenesis underscore the pivotal role of the gut microbiome, prompting an investigation into the potential therapeutic impact of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on sporadic ALS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial, the study enrolled 27 participants from October 2022 to April 2023. The participants were followed up for 6 months from February 2023 to October 2023, during in-person visits at baseline, week 15, week 23, and week 35. The participants, evenly randomized, received either healthy donor FMT (FMT, n = 14) or a mixture of 0.9% saline and food coloring (E150c) as sham transplantation (placebo, n = 13). The primary outcome measured the change in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score from baseline to week 35. Secondary outcomes included changes in gastrointestinal and respiratory functions, muscle strength, autonomic function, cognition, quality of life, intestinal microbiome composition, and plasm neurofilament light chain protein (NFL). Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 randomized patients (47% women; mean age, 67.2 years), 24 participants completed the entire study. Notably, ALSFRS-R score changes exhibited no significant differences between FMT (6.1 [SD, 3.11]) and placebo (6.41[SD, 2.73]) groups from baseline to week 35. Secondary efficacy outcomes, encompassing respiratory function, muscle strength, autonomic function, cognition, quality of life, and plasm NFL, showed no significant differences. Nevertheless, the FMT group exhibited improvements in constipation, depression, and anxiety symptoms. FMT induced a shift in gut microbiome community composition, marked by increased abundance of Bifidobacterium, which persisted until week 15 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.28; p = 0.01). Gastrointestinal adverse events were the primary manifestations of FMT-related side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this clinical trial involving 27 sporadic ALS patients, FMT did not significantly slow the decline in ALSFRS-R score. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of FMT in sporadic ALS patients and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR 2200064504.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03781-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03781-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种以运动神经元进行性丧失为特征的破坏性神经退行性疾病。最近对ALS发病机制的深入研究强调了肠道微生物群的关键作用,促使人们对粪便微生物群移植(FMT)对散发性ALS患者的潜在治疗影响进行了研究。方法:该研究采用双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、随机临床试验,于2022年10月至2023年4月招募了27名参与者。从2023年2月到2023年10月,参与者在基线、第15周、第23周和第35周进行了6个月的随访。参与者,均匀随机,接受健康供体FMT (FMT, n = 14)或0.9%生理盐水和食用色素(E150c)的混合物作为假移植(安慰剂,n = 13)。主要终点测量ALS功能评定量表-修订版(ALSFRS-R)总分从基线到第35周的变化。次要结局包括胃肠道和呼吸功能、肌肉力量、自主神经功能、认知、生活质量、肠道微生物组组成和质神经丝轻链蛋白(NFL)的变化。在意向治疗人群中评估了疗效和安全性结果。结果:共有27例随机患者(女性47%;平均年龄67.2岁,24名参与者完成了整个研究。值得注意的是,从基线到第35周,FMT组(6.1 [SD, 3.11])和安慰剂组(6.41[SD, 2.73])的ALSFRS-R评分变化无显著差异。次要疗效指标,包括呼吸功能、肌肉力量、自主神经功能、认知、生活质量和血浆NFL,没有显着差异。然而,FMT组在便秘、抑郁和焦虑症状方面表现出改善。FMT诱导了肠道微生物群落组成的变化,以双歧杆菌丰度的增加为标志,这种变化持续到第15周(95% CI, 0.04至0.28;p = 0.01)。胃肠道不良事件是fmt相关副作用的主要表现。结论:在这项涉及27例散发性ALS患者的临床试验中,FMT并没有显著减缓ALSFRS-R评分的下降。需要更大规模的多中心试验来证实FMT对散发性ALS患者的疗效,并探索其潜在的生物学机制。试验注册:中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR 2200064504。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder marked by the progressive loss of motor neurons. Recent insights into ALS pathogenesis underscore the pivotal role of the gut microbiome, prompting an investigation into the potential therapeutic impact of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on sporadic ALS patients.

Methods: Conducted as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial, the study enrolled 27 participants from October 2022 to April 2023. The participants were followed up for 6 months from February 2023 to October 2023, during in-person visits at baseline, week 15, week 23, and week 35. The participants, evenly randomized, received either healthy donor FMT (FMT, n = 14) or a mixture of 0.9% saline and food coloring (E150c) as sham transplantation (placebo, n = 13). The primary outcome measured the change in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score from baseline to week 35. Secondary outcomes included changes in gastrointestinal and respiratory functions, muscle strength, autonomic function, cognition, quality of life, intestinal microbiome composition, and plasm neurofilament light chain protein (NFL). Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population.

Results: A total of 27 randomized patients (47% women; mean age, 67.2 years), 24 participants completed the entire study. Notably, ALSFRS-R score changes exhibited no significant differences between FMT (6.1 [SD, 3.11]) and placebo (6.41[SD, 2.73]) groups from baseline to week 35. Secondary efficacy outcomes, encompassing respiratory function, muscle strength, autonomic function, cognition, quality of life, and plasm NFL, showed no significant differences. Nevertheless, the FMT group exhibited improvements in constipation, depression, and anxiety symptoms. FMT induced a shift in gut microbiome community composition, marked by increased abundance of Bifidobacterium, which persisted until week 15 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.28; p = 0.01). Gastrointestinal adverse events were the primary manifestations of FMT-related side effects.

Conclusions: In this clinical trial involving 27 sporadic ALS patients, FMT did not significantly slow the decline in ALSFRS-R score. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of FMT in sporadic ALS patients and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR 2200064504.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信