糖尿病患者分娩期连续血糖监测值与新生儿低血糖的关系

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Michal Fishel Bartal, Sarah A Nazeer, Joycelyn Ashby Cornthwaite, Ghamar Bitar, Sean C Blackwell, Claudia Pedroza, Suneet P Chauhan, Antonio Saad, George Saade, Baha M Sibai
{"title":"糖尿病患者分娩期连续血糖监测值与新生儿低血糖的关系","authors":"Michal Fishel Bartal, Sarah A Nazeer, Joycelyn Ashby Cornthwaite, Ghamar Bitar, Sean C Blackwell, Claudia Pedroza, Suneet P Chauhan, Antonio Saad, George Saade, Baha M Sibai","doi":"10.1055/a-2494-2157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> We aimed to evaluate the relationship between intrapartum continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) in individuals with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> a multicenter prospective study (November 2021-December 2022) of laboring individuals with pregestational or gestational diabetes at ≥34 weeks. Cohorts had a blinded CGM placed from admission through delivery and were monitored with fingerstick (FS) according to usual care. The primary outcome was NH. Secondary neonatal outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay, need for intravenous (IV) glucose therapy, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress, or respiratory distress syndrome. Time in the target range (TIR; range 70-110 mg/dL) and time above the target range (TAR; >110 mg/dL) were expressed as a percentage of all CGM readings, and mean glucose was obtained. Youden index was used to choose the cut point for TAR and prediction of NH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 9,479 deliveries during the study period, 202 (2.1%) met the inclusion criteria, and 112 (56%) participants were enrolled (<i>n</i> = 7 did not have available CGM data). Of the study participants, 45 (40%) had pregestational diabetes, and 67 (60%) had gestational diabetes. The mean glucose in labor using a CGM was 102.6 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR]:89.9, 113.5 mg/dL), and the average percentage of TIR was 62.1% (IQR, 36.9, 85.6). CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH, with no differences in area under the curve (AUC) of mean glucose as a predictor (0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.23 vs. 0.53, 95% CI: 0.4-0.6, respectively). The best cut-off for the prediction of NH was a TAR of 61%, with 23% (<i>n</i> = 24) being above the threshold. The rate of NH for TAR >61% versus ≤61% was 45.8 versus 25.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Neonates born to individuals with TAR >61% were more likely to require continuous positive airway pressure after delivery and had a higher cord c-peptide level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In this prospective study of laboring individuals with diabetes, intrapartum CGM TAR was associated with a higher rate of NH.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· CGM use in labor is feasible with a complete glucose profile in the various stages of labor.. · Best cut-off for predicting NH was a time above range (≥110 mg/dl) of >61%.. · CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between Intrapartum Continuous Glucose Monitoring Values and Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Individuals with Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Michal Fishel Bartal, Sarah A Nazeer, Joycelyn Ashby Cornthwaite, Ghamar Bitar, Sean C Blackwell, Claudia Pedroza, Suneet P Chauhan, Antonio Saad, George Saade, Baha M Sibai\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2494-2157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> We aimed to evaluate the relationship between intrapartum continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) in individuals with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> a multicenter prospective study (November 2021-December 2022) of laboring individuals with pregestational or gestational diabetes at ≥34 weeks. Cohorts had a blinded CGM placed from admission through delivery and were monitored with fingerstick (FS) according to usual care. The primary outcome was NH. Secondary neonatal outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay, need for intravenous (IV) glucose therapy, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress, or respiratory distress syndrome. Time in the target range (TIR; range 70-110 mg/dL) and time above the target range (TAR; >110 mg/dL) were expressed as a percentage of all CGM readings, and mean glucose was obtained. Youden index was used to choose the cut point for TAR and prediction of NH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 9,479 deliveries during the study period, 202 (2.1%) met the inclusion criteria, and 112 (56%) participants were enrolled (<i>n</i> = 7 did not have available CGM data). Of the study participants, 45 (40%) had pregestational diabetes, and 67 (60%) had gestational diabetes. The mean glucose in labor using a CGM was 102.6 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR]:89.9, 113.5 mg/dL), and the average percentage of TIR was 62.1% (IQR, 36.9, 85.6). CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH, with no differences in area under the curve (AUC) of mean glucose as a predictor (0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.23 vs. 0.53, 95% CI: 0.4-0.6, respectively). The best cut-off for the prediction of NH was a TAR of 61%, with 23% (<i>n</i> = 24) being above the threshold. The rate of NH for TAR >61% versus ≤61% was 45.8 versus 25.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Neonates born to individuals with TAR >61% were more likely to require continuous positive airway pressure after delivery and had a higher cord c-peptide level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In this prospective study of laboring individuals with diabetes, intrapartum CGM TAR was associated with a higher rate of NH.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· CGM use in labor is feasible with a complete glucose profile in the various stages of labor.. · Best cut-off for predicting NH was a time above range (≥110 mg/dl) of >61%.. · CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2494-2157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2494-2157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨糖尿病患者产时连续血糖监测(CGM)与新生儿低血糖(NH)的关系。研究设计:一项多中心前瞻性研究(2021年11月- 2022年12月),研究对象为妊娠期或妊娠期糖尿病≥34周的产妇。队列从入院到分娩都采用盲法CGM,并根据常规护理用指棒(FS)进行监测。主要结局为NH。新生儿继发性结局包括新生儿重症监护病房住院时间、静脉(IV)葡萄糖治疗需求、高胆红素血症、呼吸窘迫或呼吸窘迫综合征。在目标范围内的时间(TIR;范围70-110 mg/dL),高于目标范围的时间(TAR;bbb10 110mg/dL)表示为所有CGM读数的%,并获得平均葡萄糖。采用约登指数选择TAR切点,预测NH。结果:在研究期间的9479例分娩中,202例(2.1%)符合纳入标准,112例(56%)参与者入组(n=7没有可用的CGM数据)。在研究参与者中,45人(40%)患有妊娠糖尿病,67人(60%)患有妊娠糖尿病。使用CGM产程时平均血糖为102.6 mg/dL (IQR为89.9,113.5 mg/dL),平均TIR %为62.1% (IQR为36.9,85.6)。CGM和FS是NH的较差预测因子,作为预测因子的平均葡萄糖AUC没有差异(分别为0.64,95% CI 0.48-0.23和0.53,95% CI 0.4-0.6)。预测NH的最佳截断值为TAR的61%,其中23% (n=24)高于阈值。TAR≥61%和≤61%患者的NH率分别为45.8%和25.9% (p=0.06)。TAR值为61%的新生儿在分娩后更可能需要CPAP,且脐带c肽水平较高。结论:在这项针对糖尿病患者的前瞻性研究中,产时CGM - TAR与新生儿低血糖的高发率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between Intrapartum Continuous Glucose Monitoring Values and Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Individuals with Diabetes.

Objective:  We aimed to evaluate the relationship between intrapartum continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) in individuals with diabetes.

Study design:  a multicenter prospective study (November 2021-December 2022) of laboring individuals with pregestational or gestational diabetes at ≥34 weeks. Cohorts had a blinded CGM placed from admission through delivery and were monitored with fingerstick (FS) according to usual care. The primary outcome was NH. Secondary neonatal outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay, need for intravenous (IV) glucose therapy, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress, or respiratory distress syndrome. Time in the target range (TIR; range 70-110 mg/dL) and time above the target range (TAR; >110 mg/dL) were expressed as a percentage of all CGM readings, and mean glucose was obtained. Youden index was used to choose the cut point for TAR and prediction of NH.

Results:  Of 9,479 deliveries during the study period, 202 (2.1%) met the inclusion criteria, and 112 (56%) participants were enrolled (n = 7 did not have available CGM data). Of the study participants, 45 (40%) had pregestational diabetes, and 67 (60%) had gestational diabetes. The mean glucose in labor using a CGM was 102.6 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR]:89.9, 113.5 mg/dL), and the average percentage of TIR was 62.1% (IQR, 36.9, 85.6). CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH, with no differences in area under the curve (AUC) of mean glucose as a predictor (0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.23 vs. 0.53, 95% CI: 0.4-0.6, respectively). The best cut-off for the prediction of NH was a TAR of 61%, with 23% (n = 24) being above the threshold. The rate of NH for TAR >61% versus ≤61% was 45.8 versus 25.9% (p = 0.06). Neonates born to individuals with TAR >61% were more likely to require continuous positive airway pressure after delivery and had a higher cord c-peptide level.

Conclusion:  In this prospective study of laboring individuals with diabetes, intrapartum CGM TAR was associated with a higher rate of NH.

Key points: · CGM use in labor is feasible with a complete glucose profile in the various stages of labor.. · Best cut-off for predicting NH was a time above range (≥110 mg/dl) of >61%.. · CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信