低t2和高t2哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠的临床特征:来自COREA队列的发现

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Ji-Su Shim, Seo-Young Kim, Sae-Hoon Kim, Taehoon Lee, An-Soo Jang, Chan Sun Park, Jae-Woo Jung, Jae-Woo Kwon, Mi-Yeong Kim, Sun-Young Yoon, Jaechun Lee, Jeong-Hee Choi, Yoo Seob Shin, Hee-Kyoo Kim, Sujeong Kim, Joo-Hee Kim, Suh-Young Lee, Young-Hee Nam, Sang-Hoon Kim, So-Young Park, Byung-Keun Kim, Sang-Ha Kim, Hye-Kyung Park, Hyun Jung Jin, Sung-Ryeol Kim, Ho Joo Yoon, Han Ki Park, Young-Joo Cho, Min-Hye Kim, Tae-Bum Kim
{"title":"低t2和高t2哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠的临床特征:来自COREA队列的发现","authors":"Ji-Su Shim, Seo-Young Kim, Sae-Hoon Kim, Taehoon Lee, An-Soo Jang, Chan Sun Park, Jae-Woo Jung, Jae-Woo Kwon, Mi-Yeong Kim, Sun-Young Yoon, Jaechun Lee, Jeong-Hee Choi, Yoo Seob Shin, Hee-Kyoo Kim, Sujeong Kim, Joo-Hee Kim, Suh-Young Lee, Young-Hee Nam, Sang-Hoon Kim, So-Young Park, Byung-Keun Kim, Sang-Ha Kim, Hye-Kyung Park, Hyun Jung Jin, Sung-Ryeol Kim, Ho Joo Yoon, Han Ki Park, Young-Joo Cho, Min-Hye Kim, Tae-Bum Kim","doi":"10.4168/aair.2024.16.6.601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the emerging biologics, biomarkers and treatment options for asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) are still limited, requiring further research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 378 ACO patients from a multicenter real-world asthma cohort in Korea and compared the clinical characteristics, lung function, and exacerbation between type 2 (T2)-high and T2-low groups. We used the following comparisons: 1) low vs. high immunoglobulin E (IgE) group (≥ 100 IU/mL), 2) non-atopy vs. atopy group (sensitized to aeroallergen), 3) low vs. high blood eosinophil group (≥ 150/µL), and 4) low vs. high sputum eosinophil group (≥ 2%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high sputum eosinophil ACO group (n = 37) showed significantly lower pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (45.7% ± 15.8% <i>vs</i>. 55.9% ± 16.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.016; 1.3 ± 0.6 L <i>vs</i>. 1.6 ± 0.5 L, <i>P</i> = 0.013 for pre-BD FEV1; 0.53 ± 0.1 <i>vs</i>. 0.59 ± 0.1, P = 0.018 for post-BD FEV1/FVC) than the low sputum eosinophil ACO group (n = 25). When examining changes in lung function at the 3-month follow-up, there were significant decreases in FEV1 in the high IgE ACO group (n = 104; -11.4% ± 16.7% <i>vs</i>. -4.4% ± 9.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.023) and ΔFEV1/FVC in the high sputum eosinophil ACO group (-0.049 ± 0.063 <i>vs</i>. -0.004 ± 0.064, <i>P</i> = 0.049) than in the low IgE ACO group (n = 44) and in the low sputum eosinophil ACO group, respectively. The risk of asthma exacerbation was significantly higher in the atopic ACO group (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-17.4; <i>P</i> = 0.049) in the adjusted model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since ACOs with T2-high profiles may have lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations, T2-high specific therapies, such as biologics, should be actively considered in T2-high ACO patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"16 6","pages":"601-612"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics of T2-Low and T2-High Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap: Findings From COREA Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Su Shim, Seo-Young Kim, Sae-Hoon Kim, Taehoon Lee, An-Soo Jang, Chan Sun Park, Jae-Woo Jung, Jae-Woo Kwon, Mi-Yeong Kim, Sun-Young Yoon, Jaechun Lee, Jeong-Hee Choi, Yoo Seob Shin, Hee-Kyoo Kim, Sujeong Kim, Joo-Hee Kim, Suh-Young Lee, Young-Hee Nam, Sang-Hoon Kim, So-Young Park, Byung-Keun Kim, Sang-Ha Kim, Hye-Kyung Park, Hyun Jung Jin, Sung-Ryeol Kim, Ho Joo Yoon, Han Ki Park, Young-Joo Cho, Min-Hye Kim, Tae-Bum Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4168/aair.2024.16.6.601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the emerging biologics, biomarkers and treatment options for asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) are still limited, requiring further research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 378 ACO patients from a multicenter real-world asthma cohort in Korea and compared the clinical characteristics, lung function, and exacerbation between type 2 (T2)-high and T2-low groups. We used the following comparisons: 1) low vs. high immunoglobulin E (IgE) group (≥ 100 IU/mL), 2) non-atopy vs. atopy group (sensitized to aeroallergen), 3) low vs. high blood eosinophil group (≥ 150/µL), and 4) low vs. high sputum eosinophil group (≥ 2%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high sputum eosinophil ACO group (n = 37) showed significantly lower pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (45.7% ± 15.8% <i>vs</i>. 55.9% ± 16.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.016; 1.3 ± 0.6 L <i>vs</i>. 1.6 ± 0.5 L, <i>P</i> = 0.013 for pre-BD FEV1; 0.53 ± 0.1 <i>vs</i>. 0.59 ± 0.1, P = 0.018 for post-BD FEV1/FVC) than the low sputum eosinophil ACO group (n = 25). When examining changes in lung function at the 3-month follow-up, there were significant decreases in FEV1 in the high IgE ACO group (n = 104; -11.4% ± 16.7% <i>vs</i>. -4.4% ± 9.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.023) and ΔFEV1/FVC in the high sputum eosinophil ACO group (-0.049 ± 0.063 <i>vs</i>. -0.004 ± 0.064, <i>P</i> = 0.049) than in the low IgE ACO group (n = 44) and in the low sputum eosinophil ACO group, respectively. The risk of asthma exacerbation was significantly higher in the atopic ACO group (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-17.4; <i>P</i> = 0.049) in the adjusted model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since ACOs with T2-high profiles may have lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations, T2-high specific therapies, such as biologics, should be actively considered in T2-high ACO patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"601-612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621477/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.6.601\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.6.601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管出现了新的生物制剂,但哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)重叠(ACO)的生物标志物和治疗选择仍然有限,需要进一步研究。方法:我们从韩国的一个多中心真实哮喘队列中招募了378例ACO患者,比较了2型(T2)高组和T2低组的临床特征、肺功能和加重情况。我们采用以下比较:1)免疫球蛋白E (IgE)低与高组(≥100 IU/mL), 2)非特应性组与特应性组(对空气过敏原敏感),3)血嗜酸性粒细胞低与高组(≥150/µL), 4)痰嗜酸性粒细胞低与高组(≥2%)。结果:高痰酸性粒细胞ACO组(n = 37)使用支气管扩张剂(BD)前后1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和FEV1/用力肺活量(FVC)显著降低(45.7%±15.8%∶55.9%±16.2%,P = 0.016;术前FEV1为1.3±0.6 L vs. 1.6±0.5 L, P = 0.013;术后FEV1/FVC(0.53±0.1比0.59±0.1,P = 0.018)高于低痰嗜酸性粒细胞ACO组(n = 25)。随访3个月检查肺功能变化时,高IgE ACO组FEV1显著降低(n = 104;高痰嗜酸性粒细胞ACO组(-11.4%±16.7% vs -4.4%±9.2%,P = 0.023)和ΔFEV1/FVC分别高于低IgE ACO组(n = 44)和低痰嗜酸性粒细胞ACO组(-0.049±0.063 vs -0.004±0.064,P = 0.049)。异位性ACO组哮喘加重风险显著增高(优势比4.2;95%置信区间1.0-17.4;P = 0.049)。结论:由于t2高的ACOs可能具有较低的肺功能和更频繁的加重,因此在t2高的ACO患者中应积极考虑t2高特异性治疗,如生物制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Characteristics of T2-Low and T2-High Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap: Findings From COREA Cohort.

Purpose: Despite the emerging biologics, biomarkers and treatment options for asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) are still limited, requiring further research.

Methods: We enrolled 378 ACO patients from a multicenter real-world asthma cohort in Korea and compared the clinical characteristics, lung function, and exacerbation between type 2 (T2)-high and T2-low groups. We used the following comparisons: 1) low vs. high immunoglobulin E (IgE) group (≥ 100 IU/mL), 2) non-atopy vs. atopy group (sensitized to aeroallergen), 3) low vs. high blood eosinophil group (≥ 150/µL), and 4) low vs. high sputum eosinophil group (≥ 2%).

Results: The high sputum eosinophil ACO group (n = 37) showed significantly lower pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (45.7% ± 15.8% vs. 55.9% ± 16.2%, P = 0.016; 1.3 ± 0.6 L vs. 1.6 ± 0.5 L, P = 0.013 for pre-BD FEV1; 0.53 ± 0.1 vs. 0.59 ± 0.1, P = 0.018 for post-BD FEV1/FVC) than the low sputum eosinophil ACO group (n = 25). When examining changes in lung function at the 3-month follow-up, there were significant decreases in FEV1 in the high IgE ACO group (n = 104; -11.4% ± 16.7% vs. -4.4% ± 9.2%, P = 0.023) and ΔFEV1/FVC in the high sputum eosinophil ACO group (-0.049 ± 0.063 vs. -0.004 ± 0.064, P = 0.049) than in the low IgE ACO group (n = 44) and in the low sputum eosinophil ACO group, respectively. The risk of asthma exacerbation was significantly higher in the atopic ACO group (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-17.4; P = 0.049) in the adjusted model.

Conclusions: Since ACOs with T2-high profiles may have lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations, T2-high specific therapies, such as biologics, should be actively considered in T2-high ACO patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信