Marietta R John-White, Edmund Proper, Frank Muscara, Franz E Babl, Vicki A Anderson, Catherine L Wilson, Meredith L Borland, Bruce J Tonge, Kylie M Gray, Glenn A Melvin, Amit Kochar, Rohan Borschmann, Richard Haslam, Emma J Tavender, Michael S Gordon, Stuart R Dalziel, Karen Smith, Simon S Craig
{"title":"儿童和青少年急诊科心理健康报告的研究主题和关键数据点：一项全国德尔菲研究。","authors":"Marietta R John-White, Edmund Proper, Frank Muscara, Franz E Babl, Vicki A Anderson, Catherine L Wilson, Meredith L Borland, Bruce J Tonge, Kylie M Gray, Glenn A Melvin, Amit Kochar, Rohan Borschmann, Richard Haslam, Emma J Tavender, Michael S Gordon, Stuart R Dalziel, Karen Smith, Simon S Craig","doi":"10.1111/acem.15056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to identify a prioritized list of research themes and key data points (baseline data and research outcomes) for future studies regarding child and adolescent emergency department (ED) mental health presentations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective survey-based Delphi process was undertaken in Australia within the Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network. Hospital-based and community-based clinicians, researchers, police, ambulance paramedics, pediatric patients, and their carers were recruited to generate research themes and key data points for future pediatric ED mental health research. Responses were collated and analyzed by a steering group consisting of pediatric mental health, medical, and research/academic experts. Participants then prioritized the items through three survey rounds using a 9-point Likert-type scale to generate a final prioritized list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>184 participants (36 patients/carers and 148 clinicians/researchers) were recruited and generated 267 items for initial prioritization; 23 completed all survey rounds. The surveys identified a consensus of 71 items: 35 research themes and 36 key data points (11 baseline data points and 25 research outcomes) for future research. The top-rated research themes included patient/staff safety within the ED, the efficacy of dedicated mental health spaces, and the importance of patient follow-up. Important baseline data points included risk factors for mental health presentations and history of child abuse and/or family violence. Top-rated research outcomes included the occurrence of severe behavioral disturbance in the ED, the use of parenteral sedation, and ED re-presentation and/or suicide attempt postdischarge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Delphi process identified a prioritized list of research themes and key data points that will inform future research on child and adolescent mental health-related ED presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research themes and key data points for child and adolescent emergency department mental health presentations: A national Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Marietta R John-White, Edmund Proper, Frank Muscara, Franz E Babl, Vicki A Anderson, Catherine L Wilson, Meredith L Borland, Bruce J Tonge, Kylie M Gray, Glenn A Melvin, Amit Kochar, Rohan Borschmann, Richard Haslam, Emma J Tavender, Michael S Gordon, Stuart R Dalziel, Karen Smith, Simon S Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.15056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to identify a prioritized list of research themes and key data points (baseline data and research outcomes) for future studies regarding child and adolescent emergency department (ED) mental health presentations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective survey-based Delphi process was undertaken in Australia within the Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network. Hospital-based and community-based clinicians, researchers, police, ambulance paramedics, pediatric patients, and their carers were recruited to generate research themes and key data points for future pediatric ED mental health research. Responses were collated and analyzed by a steering group consisting of pediatric mental health, medical, and research/academic experts. Participants then prioritized the items through three survey rounds using a 9-point Likert-type scale to generate a final prioritized list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>184 participants (36 patients/carers and 148 clinicians/researchers) were recruited and generated 267 items for initial prioritization; 23 completed all survey rounds. The surveys identified a consensus of 71 items: 35 research themes and 36 key data points (11 baseline data points and 25 research outcomes) for future research. The top-rated research themes included patient/staff safety within the ED, the efficacy of dedicated mental health spaces, and the importance of patient follow-up. Important baseline data points included risk factors for mental health presentations and history of child abuse and/or family violence. Top-rated research outcomes included the occurrence of severe behavioral disturbance in the ED, the use of parenteral sedation, and ED re-presentation and/or suicide attempt postdischarge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Delphi process identified a prioritized list of research themes and key data points that will inform future research on child and adolescent mental health-related ED presentations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research themes and key data points for child and adolescent emergency department mental health presentations: A national Delphi study.
Objective: The objective was to identify a prioritized list of research themes and key data points (baseline data and research outcomes) for future studies regarding child and adolescent emergency department (ED) mental health presentations.
Methods: A prospective survey-based Delphi process was undertaken in Australia within the Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network. Hospital-based and community-based clinicians, researchers, police, ambulance paramedics, pediatric patients, and their carers were recruited to generate research themes and key data points for future pediatric ED mental health research. Responses were collated and analyzed by a steering group consisting of pediatric mental health, medical, and research/academic experts. Participants then prioritized the items through three survey rounds using a 9-point Likert-type scale to generate a final prioritized list.
Results: 184 participants (36 patients/carers and 148 clinicians/researchers) were recruited and generated 267 items for initial prioritization; 23 completed all survey rounds. The surveys identified a consensus of 71 items: 35 research themes and 36 key data points (11 baseline data points and 25 research outcomes) for future research. The top-rated research themes included patient/staff safety within the ED, the efficacy of dedicated mental health spaces, and the importance of patient follow-up. Important baseline data points included risk factors for mental health presentations and history of child abuse and/or family violence. Top-rated research outcomes included the occurrence of severe behavioral disturbance in the ED, the use of parenteral sedation, and ED re-presentation and/or suicide attempt postdischarge.
Conclusions: The Delphi process identified a prioritized list of research themes and key data points that will inform future research on child and adolescent mental health-related ED presentations.
期刊介绍：
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
