eDNA元条形码——西南印度洋留尼汪岛河口水生生物多样性监测的一种有前景的工具

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Lou-Anne Jannel, François Guilhaumon, Pierre Valade, Pascale Chabanet, Guillaume Borie, Henri Grondin, Philippe Jourand
{"title":"eDNA元条形码——西南印度洋留尼汪岛河口水生生物多样性监测的一种有前景的工具","authors":"Lou-Anne Jannel,&nbsp;François Guilhaumon,&nbsp;Pierre Valade,&nbsp;Pascale Chabanet,&nbsp;Guillaume Borie,&nbsp;Henri Grondin,&nbsp;Philippe Jourand","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reunion Island is in the South-West Indian Ocean (SWIO), where all freshwater fish species are diadromous. The ecological status assessments of freshwater in watersheds have revealed a continuing deterioration in these fish populations due to anthropic pressures. In this context, monitoring the fish's biological sustainability is crucial to ensure the health of these estuarine ecosystems. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional electrofishing monitoring (EF) with the environmental DNA metabarcoding tool to evaluate fish biodiversity in the estuaries. We measured the diversity and structure of the fish community in three estuaries with various geographical, hydrological, and anthropogenic conditions over different seasons. To this end, fish were captured by EF, and we then isolated DNA from the water samples to perform bioinformatic analyses derived from eDNA, using the 12S marker. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare the results of these two methods. For all watersheds combined, a comparison of the results for measuring fish richness showed that eDNA performed significantly better than EF. Indeed, the eDNA detected 31 species, whereas the EF detected only 12 species. For both methods, we observed significant differences in community structure between watersheds, with a significant nestedness phenomenon where the fish assemblage obtained from EF captures is a sub-assemblage of that obtained from eDNA. Moreover, compared to EF, eDNA enabled the detection of endemic to the Mascarene region species (e.g., <i>Cotylopus acutipinnis</i>), introduced exotic species (e.g., <i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>), and species difficult to capture and identify due to their juvenile life stage through EF (e.g., <i>Anguilla</i> sp.). Our data confirm the effectiveness of eDNA to detect fish species, both taxonomically and in terms of species richness and proves to be an effective tool for monitoring fish diversity of the islands of the SWIO.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"eDNA Metabarcoding, a Promising Tool for Monitoring Aquatic Biodiversity in the Estuaries of Reunion Island (South-West Indian Ocean)\",\"authors\":\"Lou-Anne Jannel,&nbsp;François Guilhaumon,&nbsp;Pierre Valade,&nbsp;Pascale Chabanet,&nbsp;Guillaume Borie,&nbsp;Henri Grondin,&nbsp;Philippe Jourand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reunion Island is in the South-West Indian Ocean (SWIO), where all freshwater fish species are diadromous. The ecological status assessments of freshwater in watersheds have revealed a continuing deterioration in these fish populations due to anthropic pressures. In this context, monitoring the fish's biological sustainability is crucial to ensure the health of these estuarine ecosystems. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional electrofishing monitoring (EF) with the environmental DNA metabarcoding tool to evaluate fish biodiversity in the estuaries. We measured the diversity and structure of the fish community in three estuaries with various geographical, hydrological, and anthropogenic conditions over different seasons. To this end, fish were captured by EF, and we then isolated DNA from the water samples to perform bioinformatic analyses derived from eDNA, using the 12S marker. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare the results of these two methods. For all watersheds combined, a comparison of the results for measuring fish richness showed that eDNA performed significantly better than EF. Indeed, the eDNA detected 31 species, whereas the EF detected only 12 species. For both methods, we observed significant differences in community structure between watersheds, with a significant nestedness phenomenon where the fish assemblage obtained from EF captures is a sub-assemblage of that obtained from eDNA. Moreover, compared to EF, eDNA enabled the detection of endemic to the Mascarene region species (e.g., <i>Cotylopus acutipinnis</i>), introduced exotic species (e.g., <i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>), and species difficult to capture and identify due to their juvenile life stage through EF (e.g., <i>Anguilla</i> sp.). Our data confirm the effectiveness of eDNA to detect fish species, both taxonomically and in terms of species richness and proves to be an effective tool for monitoring fish diversity of the islands of the SWIO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

留尼汪岛位于西南印度洋(SWIO),那里所有的淡水鱼都是双雌的。对流域淡水生态状况的评估表明,由于人为压力,这些鱼类种群持续恶化。在这种情况下,监测鱼类的生物可持续性对于确保这些河口生态系统的健康至关重要。本研究的目的是比较传统电钓监测(EF)与环境DNA元条形码工具在河口鱼类生物多样性评价中的效果。我们测量了不同季节不同地理、水文和人为条件下三个河口鱼类群落的多样性和结构。为此,我们用EF捕获鱼,然后从水样中分离DNA,使用12S标记进行来自eDNA的生物信息学分析。对两种方法的结果进行统计分析比较。对所有流域的鱼类丰富度测量结果的比较表明,eDNA的表现明显优于EF。事实上,eDNA检测到31个物种,而EF只检测到12个物种。对于这两种方法,我们观察到不同流域之间的群落结构存在显著差异,通过EF捕获获得的鱼类组合是通过eDNA获得的鱼类组合的子组合,存在显著的巢性现象。此外,与EF相比,eDNA能够通过EF检测到Mascarene地区特有的物种(如Cotylopus acutipinnis),引入的外来物种(如Oreochromis niloticus)以及由于其幼年生活阶段而难以捕获和鉴定的物种(如Anguilla sp.)。我们的数据证实了eDNA在分类和物种丰富度方面检测鱼类物种的有效性,并被证明是监测西南大西洋群岛鱼类多样性的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

eDNA Metabarcoding, a Promising Tool for Monitoring Aquatic Biodiversity in the Estuaries of Reunion Island (South-West Indian Ocean)

eDNA Metabarcoding, a Promising Tool for Monitoring Aquatic Biodiversity in the Estuaries of Reunion Island (South-West Indian Ocean)

Reunion Island is in the South-West Indian Ocean (SWIO), where all freshwater fish species are diadromous. The ecological status assessments of freshwater in watersheds have revealed a continuing deterioration in these fish populations due to anthropic pressures. In this context, monitoring the fish's biological sustainability is crucial to ensure the health of these estuarine ecosystems. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional electrofishing monitoring (EF) with the environmental DNA metabarcoding tool to evaluate fish biodiversity in the estuaries. We measured the diversity and structure of the fish community in three estuaries with various geographical, hydrological, and anthropogenic conditions over different seasons. To this end, fish were captured by EF, and we then isolated DNA from the water samples to perform bioinformatic analyses derived from eDNA, using the 12S marker. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare the results of these two methods. For all watersheds combined, a comparison of the results for measuring fish richness showed that eDNA performed significantly better than EF. Indeed, the eDNA detected 31 species, whereas the EF detected only 12 species. For both methods, we observed significant differences in community structure between watersheds, with a significant nestedness phenomenon where the fish assemblage obtained from EF captures is a sub-assemblage of that obtained from eDNA. Moreover, compared to EF, eDNA enabled the detection of endemic to the Mascarene region species (e.g., Cotylopus acutipinnis), introduced exotic species (e.g., Oreochromis niloticus), and species difficult to capture and identify due to their juvenile life stage through EF (e.g., Anguilla sp.). Our data confirm the effectiveness of eDNA to detect fish species, both taxonomically and in terms of species richness and proves to be an effective tool for monitoring fish diversity of the islands of the SWIO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信