在实验室条件下饲养的华盛顿州西部两种野生枝海纲物种——四角独角龙(Alona quadrangularis)和大菱鲆(Scapholeberis mucronata)的比较人口学研究

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Melissa K. Driessnack, Jenifer McIntyre, John D. Stark
{"title":"在实验室条件下饲养的华盛顿州西部两种野生枝海纲物种——四角独角龙(Alona quadrangularis)和大菱鲆(Scapholeberis mucronata)的比较人口学研究","authors":"Melissa K. Driessnack,&nbsp;Jenifer McIntyre,&nbsp;John D. Stark","doi":"10.1111/ivb.12448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Populations of two cladoceran species, <i>Alona quadrangularis</i> and <i>Scapholeberis mucronata</i>, were collected from a pond in Puyallup, Washington, and reared under controlled laboratory conditions. Life tables were developed for each species under the same environmental conditions and feeding regimen to develop basic demographic data. We also compared the major demographic parameters of these two wild species with those of several cladoceran species that are commonly used in laboratory research, <i>Daphnia pulex</i>, <i>D. magna</i>, and <i>Ceriodaphnia dubia</i>. Compared to <i>A. quadrangularis</i>, <i>S. mucronata</i> had a much higher net reproductive rate (<i>R</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>), a longer generation time (<i>T</i>), but a similar intrinsic rate of increase (<i>r</i><sub><i>m</i></sub>), similar finite rate of increase, similar doubling time (<i>DT</i>), and a lower birth rate (<i>b</i>). Both wild species had lower <i>R</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>, shorter <i>T</i>, and higher <i>b</i> than in <i>D. pulex</i>, <i>D. magna</i>, and <i>C. dubia</i>. Results of this study showed that demographic rates differed between <i>A. quadrangularis</i> and <i>S. mucronata</i>, and differed from those reported for the other three laboratory species. These results suggest that data developed for commonly used cladoceran species in the laboratory should not be used to make generalizations about effects on wild species.</p>","PeriodicalId":54923,"journal":{"name":"Invertebrate Biology","volume":"143 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ivb.12448","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative demography of two wild cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, collected in western Washington state and reared under laboratory conditions\",\"authors\":\"Melissa K. Driessnack,&nbsp;Jenifer McIntyre,&nbsp;John D. Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ivb.12448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Populations of two cladoceran species, <i>Alona quadrangularis</i> and <i>Scapholeberis mucronata</i>, were collected from a pond in Puyallup, Washington, and reared under controlled laboratory conditions. Life tables were developed for each species under the same environmental conditions and feeding regimen to develop basic demographic data. We also compared the major demographic parameters of these two wild species with those of several cladoceran species that are commonly used in laboratory research, <i>Daphnia pulex</i>, <i>D. magna</i>, and <i>Ceriodaphnia dubia</i>. Compared to <i>A. quadrangularis</i>, <i>S. mucronata</i> had a much higher net reproductive rate (<i>R</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>), a longer generation time (<i>T</i>), but a similar intrinsic rate of increase (<i>r</i><sub><i>m</i></sub>), similar finite rate of increase, similar doubling time (<i>DT</i>), and a lower birth rate (<i>b</i>). Both wild species had lower <i>R</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>, shorter <i>T</i>, and higher <i>b</i> than in <i>D. pulex</i>, <i>D. magna</i>, and <i>C. dubia</i>. Results of this study showed that demographic rates differed between <i>A. quadrangularis</i> and <i>S. mucronata</i>, and differed from those reported for the other three laboratory species. These results suggest that data developed for commonly used cladoceran species in the laboratory should not be used to make generalizations about effects on wild species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Invertebrate Biology\",\"volume\":\"143 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ivb.12448\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Invertebrate Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ivb.12448\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invertebrate Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ivb.12448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从美国华盛顿州Puyallup的一个池塘中采集了两种枝海纲物种——四棱海纲(Alona quadrangularis)和长柄海纲(Scapholeberis mucronata),并在实验室条件下进行了饲养。在相同的环境条件和喂养方式下,为每个物种制定了生命表,以获得基本的人口数据。我们还将这两种野生物种的主要人口统计学参数与实验室研究中常用的几种支海动物Daphnia pulex、d.m agna和Ceriodaphnia dubia进行了比较。与四角草相比,长角草的净繁殖率(R0)高得多,代时间(T)长得多,但内在增长率(rm)、有限增长率(rm)、加倍时间(DT)相似,而出生率(b)低得多。两种野生种的R0均低于D. pulex、D. magna和C. dubia, T短,b高。结果表明,四角沙蚕和毛棘沙蚕的人口统计率存在差异,且与其他3个实验种的人口统计率存在差异。这些结果表明,在实验室中为常用的枝海物种开发的数据不应用于对野生物种的影响进行概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative demography of two wild cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, collected in western Washington state and reared under laboratory conditions

Comparative demography of two wild cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, collected in western Washington state and reared under laboratory conditions

Populations of two cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, were collected from a pond in Puyallup, Washington, and reared under controlled laboratory conditions. Life tables were developed for each species under the same environmental conditions and feeding regimen to develop basic demographic data. We also compared the major demographic parameters of these two wild species with those of several cladoceran species that are commonly used in laboratory research, Daphnia pulex, D. magna, and Ceriodaphnia dubia. Compared to A. quadrangularis, S. mucronata had a much higher net reproductive rate (R0), a longer generation time (T), but a similar intrinsic rate of increase (rm), similar finite rate of increase, similar doubling time (DT), and a lower birth rate (b). Both wild species had lower R0, shorter T, and higher b than in D. pulex, D. magna, and C. dubia. Results of this study showed that demographic rates differed between A. quadrangularis and S. mucronata, and differed from those reported for the other three laboratory species. These results suggest that data developed for commonly used cladoceran species in the laboratory should not be used to make generalizations about effects on wild species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Invertebrate Biology
Invertebrate Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Invertebrate Biology presents fundamental advances in our understanding of the structure, function, ecology, and evolution of the invertebrates, which represent the vast majority of animal diversity. Though ultimately organismal in focus, the journal publishes manuscripts addressing phenomena at all levels of biological organization. Invertebrate Biology welcomes manuscripts addressing the biology of invertebrates from diverse perspectives, including those of: • genetics, cell, and molecular biology • morphology and biomechanics • reproduction and development • physiology and behavior • ecology • evolution and phylogenetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信