超出要求:一份新的患者随访报告

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jack A. Allan MD, MBA, Zachary Repanshek MD, Megan E. Healy MD, Michael DeAngelis MD, Wayne A. Satz MD, Jacob W. Ufberg MD, Kraftin E. Schreyer MD, MBA
{"title":"超出要求:一份新的患者随访报告","authors":"Jack A. Allan MD, MBA,&nbsp;Zachary Repanshek MD,&nbsp;Megan E. Healy MD,&nbsp;Michael DeAngelis MD,&nbsp;Wayne A. Satz MD,&nbsp;Jacob W. Ufberg MD,&nbsp;Kraftin E. Schreyer MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Residents are required to participate in practice-based learning and improvement. Most commonly, a resident-initiated patient follow-up log is used to meet the requirement. We sought to provide residents with follow-up information in an efficient, value-added manner via a patient follow-up report (PFUR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The PFUR is an automated monthly report sent to individual residents via email. It was generated from the electronic medical record and included five categories of cases: patients who were discharged and returned for admission within 72 h, diagnosis-based criteria, patients who expired during the hospital stay, patients who were admitted to or upgraded to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 h of admission, and patients independently flagged by the care team for follow-up. The PFURs were analyzed for 6 months after implementation for number and categorization of cases included as well as via survey of the residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In 6 months, 1078 patients, generating 1155 follow-ups, were included on the PFUR. ICU upgrades were the most represented category (41%), followed by diagnosis-based criteria (30%). Patients who were discharged and admitted within 72 h were least commonly represented on the PFUR (2%). Seventy-eight percent of residents felt that patient follow-ups were valuable to their education and 82% felt that the PFUR impacted the clinical care they provided. The PFUR was preferred by 90% of resident respondents and had an average value rating of 4.38 out of 5.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall numbers of patient follow-ups significantly increased after implementation of the PFUR. Certain categories were more represented overall and within each class, which has implications for future educational initiatives. After a pilot period, the novel PFUR appears to be more efficient, accessible, and highly valued than the log used previously. Programs looking to maximize the educational benefits of patient follow-ups may consider a similar initiative.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the requirement: A novel patient follow-up report\",\"authors\":\"Jack A. Allan MD, MBA,&nbsp;Zachary Repanshek MD,&nbsp;Megan E. Healy MD,&nbsp;Michael DeAngelis MD,&nbsp;Wayne A. Satz MD,&nbsp;Jacob W. Ufberg MD,&nbsp;Kraftin E. Schreyer MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.11042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Residents are required to participate in practice-based learning and improvement. Most commonly, a resident-initiated patient follow-up log is used to meet the requirement. We sought to provide residents with follow-up information in an efficient, value-added manner via a patient follow-up report (PFUR).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PFUR is an automated monthly report sent to individual residents via email. It was generated from the electronic medical record and included five categories of cases: patients who were discharged and returned for admission within 72 h, diagnosis-based criteria, patients who expired during the hospital stay, patients who were admitted to or upgraded to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 h of admission, and patients independently flagged by the care team for follow-up. The PFURs were analyzed for 6 months after implementation for number and categorization of cases included as well as via survey of the residents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In 6 months, 1078 patients, generating 1155 follow-ups, were included on the PFUR. ICU upgrades were the most represented category (41%), followed by diagnosis-based criteria (30%). Patients who were discharged and admitted within 72 h were least commonly represented on the PFUR (2%). Seventy-eight percent of residents felt that patient follow-ups were valuable to their education and 82% felt that the PFUR impacted the clinical care they provided. The PFUR was preferred by 90% of resident respondents and had an average value rating of 4.38 out of 5.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall numbers of patient follow-ups significantly increased after implementation of the PFUR. Certain categories were more represented overall and within each class, which has implications for future educational initiatives. After a pilot period, the novel PFUR appears to be more efficient, accessible, and highly valued than the log used previously. Programs looking to maximize the educational benefits of patient follow-ups may consider a similar initiative.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住院医师需要参与基于实践的学习和改进。最常见的是,住院医师发起的患者随访记录被用来满足要求。我们试图通过患者随访报告(PFUR)以一种高效、增值的方式为住院患者提供随访信息。方法PFUR是一种自动的月度报告,通过电子邮件发送给每个居民。它是从电子病历中生成的,包括五类病例:72小时内出院并返回入院的患者、基于诊断的标准、住院期间过期的患者、入院后24小时内入住或升级到重症监护病房(ICU)的患者,以及由护理团队独立标记为随访的患者。对实施后6个月的病例数和分类进行分析,并对居民进行调查。结果在6个月的时间里,共有1078例患者接受了PFUR治疗,随访1155例。ICU升级是最具代表性的类别(41%),其次是基于诊断的标准(30%)。出院并在72小时内入院的患者在PFUR上最不常见(2%)。78%的住院医生认为患者随访对他们的教育有价值,82%的住院医生认为PFUR影响了他们提供的临床护理。90%的居民受访者更喜欢PFUR,平均价值评分为4.38分(满分5分)。结论实施PFUR后,患者随访总人数显著增加。某些类别在整体上和每个班级中都有更多的代表,这对未来的教育活动有影响。经过一段时间的试验,新型的PFUR似乎比以前使用的日志更有效、更容易获取、更有价值。希望最大限度地提高患者随访教育效益的项目可以考虑采取类似的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the requirement: A novel patient follow-up report

Background

Residents are required to participate in practice-based learning and improvement. Most commonly, a resident-initiated patient follow-up log is used to meet the requirement. We sought to provide residents with follow-up information in an efficient, value-added manner via a patient follow-up report (PFUR).

Methods

The PFUR is an automated monthly report sent to individual residents via email. It was generated from the electronic medical record and included five categories of cases: patients who were discharged and returned for admission within 72 h, diagnosis-based criteria, patients who expired during the hospital stay, patients who were admitted to or upgraded to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 h of admission, and patients independently flagged by the care team for follow-up. The PFURs were analyzed for 6 months after implementation for number and categorization of cases included as well as via survey of the residents.

Results

In 6 months, 1078 patients, generating 1155 follow-ups, were included on the PFUR. ICU upgrades were the most represented category (41%), followed by diagnosis-based criteria (30%). Patients who were discharged and admitted within 72 h were least commonly represented on the PFUR (2%). Seventy-eight percent of residents felt that patient follow-ups were valuable to their education and 82% felt that the PFUR impacted the clinical care they provided. The PFUR was preferred by 90% of resident respondents and had an average value rating of 4.38 out of 5.

Conclusions

Overall numbers of patient follow-ups significantly increased after implementation of the PFUR. Certain categories were more represented overall and within each class, which has implications for future educational initiatives. After a pilot period, the novel PFUR appears to be more efficient, accessible, and highly valued than the log used previously. Programs looking to maximize the educational benefits of patient follow-ups may consider a similar initiative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信