南卡罗来纳西北部溪流中与家禽养殖场和牧场覆盖有关的粪便指示细菌丰度和大肠杆菌多样性

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Virginia H. Britt, Min-Ken Liao, Gregory P. Lewis
{"title":"南卡罗来纳西北部溪流中与家禽养殖场和牧场覆盖有关的粪便指示细菌丰度和大肠杆菌多样性","authors":"Virginia H. Britt,&nbsp;Min-Ken Liao,&nbsp;Gregory P. Lewis","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Livestock can contribute fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to waterbodies. However, few studies have examined the relationship between watershed land use or land cover involving livestock production and the genetic diversity of <i>Escherichia coli</i> in freshwater ecosystems. Our major goal was to determine if FIB abundance and <i>E. coli</i> phylogenetic group distributions in headwater streams are related to livestock production in rural watersheds in South Carolina. In both 2017 and 2018, grab samples were collected from streams at summer baseflow. In 2017, we collected samples from watersheds with or without poultry rearing facilities (PRFs). In 2018, we collected samples from streams draining watersheds with mixed forest and pasture cover and from streams in mostly forested watersheds. In both summers, we measured concentrations of total coliforms, <i>E. coli</i>, and <i>Enterococcus</i>. We also categorized <i>E. coli</i> isolates into one of four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D). Streams with PRFs in their watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of <i>Enterococcus</i> but not total coliforms or <i>E. coli</i> than streams in watersheds without PRFs. Also, B2 isolates were less frequent and B1 isolates were more frequent in watersheds with PRFs than in those without. Streams draining mixed forest/pasture watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of total coliforms and <i>E. coli</i> but not <i>Enterococcus</i>, as well as higher frequencies of B1 isolates, than streams in mostly forested watersheds. Overall, the most frequent <i>E. coli</i> phylogenetic groups in watersheds with animal production appeared consistent with the phylogenetic groups that are especially abundant in poultry or mammalian livestock feces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina\",\"authors\":\"Virginia H. Britt,&nbsp;Min-Ken Liao,&nbsp;Gregory P. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Livestock can contribute fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to waterbodies. However, few studies have examined the relationship between watershed land use or land cover involving livestock production and the genetic diversity of <i>Escherichia coli</i> in freshwater ecosystems. Our major goal was to determine if FIB abundance and <i>E. coli</i> phylogenetic group distributions in headwater streams are related to livestock production in rural watersheds in South Carolina. In both 2017 and 2018, grab samples were collected from streams at summer baseflow. In 2017, we collected samples from watersheds with or without poultry rearing facilities (PRFs). In 2018, we collected samples from streams draining watersheds with mixed forest and pasture cover and from streams in mostly forested watersheds. In both summers, we measured concentrations of total coliforms, <i>E. coli</i>, and <i>Enterococcus</i>. We also categorized <i>E. coli</i> isolates into one of four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D). Streams with PRFs in their watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of <i>Enterococcus</i> but not total coliforms or <i>E. coli</i> than streams in watersheds without PRFs. Also, B2 isolates were less frequent and B1 isolates were more frequent in watersheds with PRFs than in those without. Streams draining mixed forest/pasture watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of total coliforms and <i>E. coli</i> but not <i>Enterococcus</i>, as well as higher frequencies of B1 isolates, than streams in mostly forested watersheds. Overall, the most frequent <i>E. coli</i> phylogenetic groups in watersheds with animal production appeared consistent with the phylogenetic groups that are especially abundant in poultry or mammalian livestock feces.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牲畜可向水体贡献粪便指示菌(FIB)。然而,很少有研究审查涉及畜牧生产的流域土地利用或土地覆盖与淡水生态系统中大肠杆菌遗传多样性之间的关系。我们的主要目标是确定源溪流中FIB丰度和大肠杆菌系统发育群分布是否与南卡罗来纳州农村流域的畜牧业生产有关。在2017年和2018年,从夏季基流的溪流中收集了抓取样本。2017年,我们从有或没有家禽饲养设施(prf)的流域收集了样本。2018年,我们从森林和牧场混合覆盖的流域和大部分森林覆盖的流域的溪流中收集了样本。在这两个夏天,我们测量了总大肠菌群、大肠杆菌和肠球菌的浓度。我们还将大肠杆菌分离物分为4个系统发育类群(A、B1、B2、D)中的一个。与没有PRFs的流域相比,流域中有PRFs的河流中肠球菌的浓度明显更高,但大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的浓度不高。在有PRFs的流域,B2分离株的出现频率较低,B1分离株的出现频率高于无PRFs的流域。与大部分森林流域的河流相比,森林/牧场流域的河流中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的浓度显著高于森林流域,而肠球菌的浓度显著高于森林流域。总体而言,在有动物生产的流域中,最常见的大肠杆菌系统发生群似乎与家禽或哺乳动物粪便中特别丰富的系统发生群一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina

Livestock can contribute fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to waterbodies. However, few studies have examined the relationship between watershed land use or land cover involving livestock production and the genetic diversity of Escherichia coli in freshwater ecosystems. Our major goal was to determine if FIB abundance and E. coli phylogenetic group distributions in headwater streams are related to livestock production in rural watersheds in South Carolina. In both 2017 and 2018, grab samples were collected from streams at summer baseflow. In 2017, we collected samples from watersheds with or without poultry rearing facilities (PRFs). In 2018, we collected samples from streams draining watersheds with mixed forest and pasture cover and from streams in mostly forested watersheds. In both summers, we measured concentrations of total coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus. We also categorized E. coli isolates into one of four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D). Streams with PRFs in their watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of Enterococcus but not total coliforms or E. coli than streams in watersheds without PRFs. Also, B2 isolates were less frequent and B1 isolates were more frequent in watersheds with PRFs than in those without. Streams draining mixed forest/pasture watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of total coliforms and E. coli but not Enterococcus, as well as higher frequencies of B1 isolates, than streams in mostly forested watersheds. Overall, the most frequent E. coli phylogenetic groups in watersheds with animal production appeared consistent with the phylogenetic groups that are especially abundant in poultry or mammalian livestock feces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信